3 10 110 https://nam.maydayrooms.org/files/original/49b4868bd4b54059c4b34aa701f2b119.pdf e4bdd86c327935e0e41d628f0ab18cdf Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Professional Issues Description An account of the resource A cohort of NAM members became engaged with the professional registration body, standing as elected councillors on the Architects Registration Council and its various committees. Hitherto entirely dominated by the RIBA bloc, the Council began to yield to a new dynamic through NAM's involvement, enabling fresh perspectives on such issues as mandatory fee scales, greater lay representation on the body, ethically-based standards of professional conduct, etc. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Practice Subject The topic of the resource Article by Ray Cecil on ARCUK's Standard of Conduct Description An account of the resource had a quiet chuckle this week when the annual report of ARCUK landed on my desk. You mav remember that a few years ago the great unwashed objected to ARCUK's slmsh adherence to the RIBA Code of Conduct and managed to obtain a new Standard of Conduct. Because it was deliberately written in the vaguest possible terms, the Standard can apparently be interpreted to mean just whatever anybody wants it to mean and in fact became a licence for those architects who do not belong to a professional institute to behave according to their own aberrant standards. It seems that ARCtJK's discipline committee has found itself at odds with the Council owing to what is termed •different perspectives' and has experienced difficulty in making charges of disgraceful conduqt stick. It is now proposing to rewrite the Appendix to the Standard and give better 'guidance' to the unattached on what constitutes 'disgraceful conduct', •and I can understand why this should be necessary. Still, it should not be a difficult task. How about attaching the RIBA Code? I am sure the Institute would not mind. Leaky umbrellas Do you have Professional Indemnity Cover? Of course you do — or at least you think you have. The trouble is that you will not really know until you have a claim and your insurers accept it. The mere fact that they have recorded a 'notification of circumstances' is no guarantee that if a claim actually arises they will not repudiate liability or even void your policy altogether. I wrote some while ago of the unfortunate case where an architect had eight years of previous policies voided because he had failed to notify a circumstance (which had not given rise to a claim) and was left without cover on a number of other matters which had been RIBAJOURNALAUC,UST1988 Practice Ray Cecil discusses ARCUK's Standard of Conduct, the advantages of RIBA insurance, site safety, and the dangers of the cult of personality. 'There is a real possibility that buildings will come to be judged not on their merits, but on the eminence of the name in the bottom right-hand corner.' two years, has so far an unblemished reputation in this respect. Furthermore, no insured member has yet to resort to the condition that allows the Institute to investigate and intercede in the event of a threatened repudiation. I am well aware of the criticism that the RIBA scheme is expensive, although investigation of individual complaints generally throws up some good reason for high premium quotes. But bad cover is probably worse than no cover at all. You would not buy an umbrella with holes in it and that is only to preserve the clothes you are wearing at the time. Your insurance covers everything you possess! Incidentally, another criticism of the RIBA scheme is that it is ceasing to issue free to all practitioners the publication Professional Liability. As I am involved, let me deal with that one. RIBAIR, the company set up and financed by the money arising from the RIBA scheme, exists to promote activities which will help to reduce the liability of architects generally. It is currently funding a whole range of activities which previously had to be funded from the derisory budget of the Practice Department. With the current cuts in expenditure necessitated by a severe attack of Hay fever at Portland Place that situation is likely to continue. But just remember that the money arises from the members of the RIBA Insurance scheme. Extras like Professional Liability and the advice booklets produced by RIBAIR are part of the benefits of the scheme. The information in them is generally available elsewhere, either in the Practice supplement (partly funded by RIBAIR), in these articles, or in books commercially available. And plans are now afoot to make the other RIBAIR publications available to non-members of the scheme, on subscription. However, the best answer, if 17 �James Stirling was 'by It's shortsighted to ignore protection Being sued for negligence brings the benefits of professional liability insurance into sharp focus. Suddenly, it becomes priceless. If you haven't got it, however, the consequences could be too dire to look upon. The chances of a claim against you are all too real. It doesn't take much—an error by a junior, a simple omission, an oversight caused by too tight a schedule— all may lead a client to sue. You need the expertise of Nelson Hurst & Marsh. As the leaders in professional indemnity insurances we know precisely what cover you need and we have unrivalled knowledge of the market So we know where to find the right cover at the most competitive price. Then. if the worst happens, our expert advice, assistance and protection go into action, through our Claims Handling Service and Client Services Division. Our support is there when you need it most. You can't avoid professional risk, but you can certainly minimise the consequences. For further information write or phone today. Professional Indemnity. More than ever a necessity: QAI-)Nelson Hurst & Marsh Ltd. 1 Seething Lanq London EC3N 4NH. Tel: 01-481 9090. 18 names that tell us nothing about the guiding lights or the actual building designers. 'Ihey prefer to view architecture as a collaborative effort and let their work speak for itself. A few months ago I wrote of the pressure that the RFAC was bringing on clients to commission one of the 'name' practices for important prowcts, and pointed out the dangers of that. The parallel is clear and there is a real possibility that buildings will come to be judged not on their merits. but on the eminence of the narne in the bottom right-hand corner. And that cannot be good for the practice of architecture, or for bringing through and encouraging new talent. The author writes thoj articlcs as an architect in practice. TIC does not hold himself out to be tin expert in law or insurancc. For advice on detailed or spec:fic matters readers are (Idt'isdfl to consult their own lawyers. Computerised Classicism We enjoyed Martin Pawley's sardonic comments (April. RIBA Joumal) on the impact of CAD on the typical architectural practice, but we would like to correct one statement on our National Gallery competition drawings: about 25 per cent of our submission consisted of CAD originals. Most noteworthy, perhaps. were the large-scale site plan and elevations of Trafalgar Square. These drawings were our first foray into CAD. For the first year, we used our system solely for design and presentation work. We found it particularly helpful in drawing the Classical orders. You need draw the Corinthian capital only once: then you can resize it and move it around wherever you want. About 50 per cent of our tender documents for the National Gallery, including all the elevations and plans, are CAD generated. The oppurtunity it gives to revise and update drawings quickly, co-ordinate other disciplines, and deal with complex geometries is invaluable. While CAD has not changed what we design, it allows us to refine and improve the design much further into the documentation process than was possible or practical in pre-CAD days. It gives us architects a very fast pencil. Steven IzenourofVenturi, Rauch and Scott Brown, Philadelphia, USA Royal Remarks Norman Tebbit's unsubtle attempt to silence the Prince of Wales reveals yet again the paranoia of this Government. I trust the Prince will not be intimidated. The message is now clear; the Church should restrict itself to the 'spiritual', Amnesty International to criticising RIBAJOURNALAUGUST 1988 .4 Letters The impact of CAD, Tebbit's comments on royal views, help for black students in South Africa, and the Welsh Access Committee. foreign governments, theCharles' remarks as Citizens' Advice Bureau should constructive, as do the more keep its thoughts to itself, andmature members of the the Royal family may wave from profession. Royal boxes and pose for press I am sorry to have strayed photographs.from the drawing board, Mr T. Prince Charles is said byGeorge Ferguson, Chairman of Tebbit to be virtually without aAcanthus, Bristol job and yet he has been more effective in alerting people to the South changes facing our environment African Debate and future than anyone. EvenI have read the report in your those architects who were firstNIarch 1988 edition of the insulted by his remarks aboutCouncil debate on South Africa. modern architecture nowI am in agreement with the appreciate the enormous benefit reported sentiments as of the increased public interestexpressed in the Council's in our art. We may not becondemnation, and would like to flattered, but broader andoffer some suggestions deeper debate can only improve regarding any proposed architectural design.assistance. Charles' concern for theI would be delighted to see environment, from the buildings some kind of help being around us to the ozone layerextended to black architectural above us, and the plight of thestudents in this country by the unemployed, is a natural andRIBA. There are already thoughtful concern that hasbursaries available for this nothing to do with party politics,purpose at our universities and but everything to do withtechikons and any addition to humanity and his desire not tothese funds would be most reign over a deeply damagedhelpful. kingdom within a seriouslyIncidentally, there is no bar threatened world. The Princessbased on race, colour or creed Royal is, no doubt, the next toto anyone wishing to study be ticked off for revealing herarchitecture in this country. The concern about the plight oflimiting factor at present is starving children.simply that other professions The fact that Tebbitare favoured by blacks in apparently sees these Royal preference to architecture. remarks as dangerousWe at the rockface really need opposition reveals a your help and encouragement. mindboggling level of insecurity Our own office is at present from a Government that has employing, encouraging and neutralised all effective political lending support to several opposition. A more mature students who have not had the Government would see Prince means, and yet wish to become architects. and it is our wish that they will be able achieve their goals. Finally, one how British architects react if architectural bodies South Africa were to debate possibility of supporting an training centre in a third country, considering that it was your Prime Minister who compared the ANC as being an organisation similar goals. J. W. H. Meiring, Cape Town Disabled Access The Access Committee Wales, a committee of the Wales Council for the Disabled, provides a national forum on access issues. Its membership includes representatives of disability organisations, councils, professional associations and the Wales councils for the deaf and provides guidance and advice on access matters to developers. We are currently monitoring the operation of Part M of the Building Regulations 'Access for Disabled People'. If any readers have experienced Part M could they details to the Access Wales Council for Caerbragdy Industrial Bedwas Road, Caerphilly, Mid Glamorgan CF8 3SL. Carol Thomas, Access Officer, Wales Council for the Disabled European Exchange I am looking for a British architect's family with daughters aged about 13 and 15 who would like to get in contact daughters. They are interested in having British pen friends and an exchange in 1989. We live near the Black Forest not far from Baden-Baden. RudolfJohannes Schott. Kåthe• Kollwitz-Strasse 14, 7505 Ettlingen 6 — Ettlingenueicr, West Gennany 19 Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource RIBAJ Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived JA Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 8.1988 https://nam.maydayrooms.org/files/original/3ff00e970159e7c40822b4c36e6ae7e7.pdf 44eb3716f3540650c6e1d2128557d446 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Professional Issues Description An account of the resource A cohort of NAM members became engaged with the professional registration body, standing as elected councillors on the Architects Registration Council and its various committees. Hitherto entirely dominated by the RIBA bloc, the Council began to yield to a new dynamic through NAM's involvement, enabling fresh perspectives on such issues as mandatory fee scales, greater lay representation on the body, ethically-based standards of professional conduct, etc. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Letter to JA with notes of meeting of ARCUK Registrar with Unattached Reps Subject The topic of the resource Letter to JA with notes of meeting of ARCUK Registrar with Unattached Reps (10 pp. total) Description An account of the resource F.A.O. John Allen Avanti Architects Ltd. 39/41 North Road LONDON N7 9DP 24 June 1988 Dear John Enclosed are notes from the last Unattached meeting prior to the ARCUK Council meeting and our meeting with the Registrar — dust to keep you up—to—date with what was discussed. Maybe we can start circulating minutes regularly if people think it's useful. I've also enclosed an extra copy of Torn Markus' draft policy document. If you have any comments, you can telephone Tom (horne tel. 041-339 2829) or Alistair (work tel. 031-668 2635) before the end of June — although please remember that this Is not intended as a final joint statement, and individuals are of course at liberty to change the wording and emphasis as they think fit in their 'letter to the local electorate'. Hope the enclosures are of Interest! Sheelagh McManus cont.../ UNATTACHED MEETING WITH REGISTRAR: 14 June 1988 PRESENT : K .Forder ; N.Arn01d, A.B1am1re, A.Ear1, M,Jenks, M.Ke11y, T ,Markus, S ,McManus, D.Petherick, D.Roberts, C.Shaw; ITEMS DISCUSSED: . Contacting the Electorate: The possibility of organising a mallout to all the Unattached was discussed. A full address list (straightforward computer printout) of the Unattached can be bought from ARCUK for E30 — can be organlsed on a regional basis or grouped In accordance with year of registration — or ARCUK can supply printed address labels at 2 pence each. Postage is the most expensive part. It would cost E 1257 to commission ARCUK to carry out a nationwide mailing to all Unattached (6700 architects) or E533.50 to mall all the Unattached In the London area only (1890 architects) proportionally better value for money!. Both include a E250 handling charge. Micheal Baird (ARCUK Admissions secretary) said he would check whether it was permissable under the Data Protection Act to supply the address list on disk. . Research Into the make—up of the Electorate: Various methods of surveying the Electorate to establish who they are and what their views are were discussed. It was felt that this might link In with the previously mooted possibility of applying for an ARCUK Research award to document the history and development of the Unattached. The registrar confirmed that there was no regulation to prevent a currently serving council member applying for such an award. The deadline for this years applications is the end of July. 3. Definition of 'Maintaining a Register' The need for ARCUK to compile statistics about registered architects was discussed (In relation to the previous Item). The registrar did not think that this was necessarily ARCUKs job. The 1931 Act simply requires that ARCUK "shall maintain a register of Architects". However, he also quoted Halls Laws of England which states that a Statutory Body is entitled to do anything which It considers "relevent" to its alms. Information relating to architects other than their name, address and date of Registration cannot be held on disk at present because this would mean that ARCUK would have e to register under the Data Protection Act. (At present ARCUK Is exempt). cont.../ / 4. Gentlemans Agreement As far as anyone knew the sub—committee which was supposed to have been set up to review the Gent lemans Agreement had not yet met. There was some doubt as to whether It had even been constituted. Any changes must be notified by October If they are to affect next years elections. It was generally considered that it would be unconstitutional to abolish the agreement completely since It is the only means at present of complying with Regulation . Statistics for membership of Constituent Bodies At our request, the Registrar provided current statistics on the no.s Isited for each of the constituent bodies and the Unattached (see attached sheet). It was confirmed that 'double-counting' does take place i.e. architects who are members of more than one Constituent Body count towards the number of seats that both those Bodies have on Council. (Therefore the total no.s listed for all the Constituent Bodies plus the Unattached do not add up to the total no of Registered Architects!) . Misuse of the letter 'A' Several individual cases have teen brought to the Regis trans attention recently where acronyms containing the letter 'A' meaning 'Architect' or 'Architects' are being used for business purposes by persons not on the register In fact in some cases by individuals who have been removed from the register for disgraceful conduct. The most .commonly occurring misuse involves members of the R IBA. (see attached copy of correspondence between the Registrar and RIBA). It would appear that there might be anything up to 1000 RIBA members practislng as architects who are not on the register. ARCUK is therefore intending to carry out a 'line by line' check of all RIBA members to single out offending Individuals, starting end of June, to be finished In time for the October count. � Meeting of the Unattached held 14 June 1988 (subsequent to meeting the Registrar) PRESENT: N.Arnold, A.B1amire, A.Ear1, M.Jenks, M.Ke11y, T .Markus, S.McManus, D.Petherick, D.Roberts, C Shaw; IT WAS AGREED ACTION BY: 1 . To investigate the feasibility of setting up a Company Limited by Guarantee to service the needs of the Unattached, with the elected Unattached Representatives on Council as the Board of Directors. Possible benfits might be: Free mallshot; Grant support; etc. D .ROBERTS 2. To check out the Intricacies of the Data Protection Act — Its implications for ARCUK and the Unattached. (Liaise with Micheal Baird on ARCUK staff). C.SHAW To look at the possibilities of the Unattached maintaining a current database of names and addresses. C.SHAW 3 . •That we should plan for maxirnurn publicity around the time of Unattached nominations and elections. A draft Joint policy document for the Unattached was tabled by T.Markus. (Copy enclosed for those not present at the meeting). Everyone present was generally in agreement with the maln points. The idea of holding an open meeting of the Unattached in Hull in November to debate this policy was proposed. It was agreed to first conduct a publicity campaign by letter and in the press to sound out support for such a meeting. It was agreed to purchase an address list from ARCUK organised by regions (donations of E3 each were pooled) and then divide it roughly equally amongst us. Each representative will be responsible for contacting a / IT WAS ALSO AGREED 4. To make an application for a research award to document the history of the Unattached and survey their current views. Mary Is leaving her current Job soon and was Interested in carrying out such a research project. M.KELLY T .MARKUS M.JENKS ALL NAMED PARTIES TO REPORT BACK TO NEXT MEETING ON. . . Tuesday 11 October 1988 at 2 pm at 73 Hallam Street. �0 q020 0(いト℃ ニ 亠い)を」:」. Nコ -亠W.」.3 00 0~い っ一0)ナ」 -亠 工 ヱ辷 W. IA 1.9,T」:一ぐこ:9 ト一ぐ一ニ N「一辷 �� KJF/CK 6 April 1988 Peter Sutton Egq Royal Institute of Br1t1Bh ArchitectB 66 Portland Place London WI Dear Peter As you know you and I and George McClellan have recently digcugged the case of Blacker who wag Btruck off the Register In 1985 and hag not applied for reinetatement. George tellB me that he applied to regume memberghlp of the RIBA, I think the next year, and thiB wag granted. This meang that he now holde RIBA membership when hig name 1B not on the Register. Thig 1B not' the first cage we have met of thig Bort (another cage I have come acroBB recently 1B Alan Victor Wall 1B who left the Register in 1977 and hag been an RIBA member, apparently, ever since ) . I am rather concerned about the law In thig matter. A pergon not an architect In th1B country unlegg h1B name appears on the Register. The RIBA 1B an aggoclatlon of architects (not architecte and otherg ) . There are Indlcatlong that there may be other pergong in RIBA membership who fall In thig sort of category and we shall have to take Btepg to ensure they are not included in congtltuent body countg. I am told that another possible gource of discrepancy the categoriBation of people working overseas. The law requireg that the Regigter conglBtB of a 11Bt of buglneBB addreggeg and that only those businegg addresseg within the United Kingdom may be used eor congtltuent body counts . learn that there 1B a number of RIBA memberg in regpect of whom you may have recorded home addreggeg within the United Kingdom whereag In fact their buglneBB addreggeg are overgeag. We must ensure that these are excluded. The present plan 1B that we are going to comence In May an operation {'cr a 1 ine by llne examination of the RIBA 11st. It may take Beveral weekB. I thought I would let you know thig now because you will doubtleBB either want to be present yourself or Bend gomeone from your office while the operation 1B going on. Perhapg you could let me know dates In May and June particularly which may be cnnvenient for you. Yours Blncerely ReglBtrar Royal Institute of British Architects 66 Portland Place London WIN 4AD e 01-580 5533 PGS/NB 14th April 1988 K J Forder Esq Architects Registration Council of the United Kingdom, 73 Hal lam Street, London WIN 6EE Dear Kenneth, Thank you for your letter of 6th April 1988. The RIBA elects or reinstates people to membership in accordance with its Charter and Byelaws . There is no requirement that a person s name must be on the Register of Architects or indeed remain on the Register but at the last count in October, there were 5108 members vhose names do not appear on the Register. The only requirement to take account of removal from the Register is if a Council Member or Honorary Officer is struck off in consequence of a criminal offence or professional misconduct. All members are required on election to sign a Declaration that will be governed and bound by the RIBA Charter and Byelaws and clearly any member whose name was not on the Register of Architects and who styled himself Chartered Architect or used the RIBA affix in relation to any trade or business would be acting illegally and would be in breach of Charter clause 4.6 and I can assure you that the RIBA seeks to enforce the Registration Act in this respect. With regard to the constituent body count, as you know every effort is made to keep the records of both ARCUK and the RIBA . in line. RIBA members who are not on the Register of Architects are not included in the RIBA count and account is taken of the address on file but of course it would be completely incorrect to say that our addresses remain in line as we have no statutory requirement to use the business address . However, the number of members involved would hardly be significant. With regard to your line by line examination of the RIBA list, clearly we would like to know how this is going to be carried out as the greatest problem is finding an up to date list. We would also require to know what alteration you are making so that our own records can be amended. I will be on leave from 25th May until 20th June. Would any advantage be served if Chris Lakin and I were to meet you to discuss this . Yours sincerely , P G Sutton EMBERSHIP ADMINISTRATION SECRETARY Fax: 01-255 1541 Telex: 24224 MONREFG quoting ref 2931 DISCUSSION NOTE FOR UNATTACHED COUNCIL L CRS ' 1 4 . 4 . 88 i . Campaiqn strateqv Obtai n awareness by unattached arch i tects by next el ecti on . Good publ i ci ty. Campai gn document - draft ready for October. Circul ate to press etc . Second , i nt•ensive , campaign , January 1989. Possi bl e regi onal meeti ngs? In School s? Rel ati on to Hul l meeti ng i n November? Circul ati on of statement to al l 6600+ unattached. Ca . f needed f or st ati oner y , postage etc . ARCIJK can supply printed l abel s. How to rai se money? Coul d one approach al l unattached for an annual donation of €1 . 00? 2. Campai qn content . Pi ck on one or two key i ssues and pl ug forceful l y. Uni fying theme - Parl i ament cl earl y i ntended , i n 1930s , to bri ng to bear on practi ce and educati on i nf l uences wider than merel y those of professi on . Communi ty at l arge . Nowadays woul d be cal l ed bui l di ng users and bui l di ng producers (see representati on from vari ous educati onal , publ i c and trade/ craft bodi es) . Means wideni ng cr i t i que of bui l di ng qual i ty to i ncl ude the i nterest of these , often ' di senfranchi sed , groups. Therefore focus i n campaign on two central objecti ves. 2. 1 Educati on Ful l support to current ' i n i ti at i ves for 50/50 partnership wi th RIBA i n Vi si ti ng Board. But , i n l onger term, develop towards taki ng f ul l charge of statutory educati onal functi on. In both short and l onger terms, i n any case , develop cri t i que and cri teri a for educati on whi ch ari ses from uni fyi ng theme above. I . e. bri ng to bear on formation of archi tects continuous i nf l uences from community. Beyond occasi onal communi ty archi tecture ' project . Teaching of soci al practi ce and soci al theory , es central as technology , management and aesthetic content of courses. Real i ssues i n every project. Identifyi ng conf l icts of i nterest i n al l bri efs. Becoming ski l l ed i n si te and product i on processes. Shi ft i n CPD so not just techni cal / l egal / management/ computing etc. but re-ori entation of atti tudes to practi ce. Practi ce Br i ng bear bui l di ng performance . i n interpretati on of The Standard of Conduc t . Invol ve non-archi tectural interests in arri vi ng at deci si ons. Open processes to publ i c vi ew. But more than broadening di scipl i nary procedures , which are desi gned to be reacti ve 1 to fai lures . Encourage performance-based not i on of qual i ty (techni cal 5 soci al and aestheti c) trough qui ciance , CF L), medi a mater i al . Work wi th user groups. He seen to be acti vel y promoti ng Par l i ament ' s intenti on E agai nst restri ci tve monopoly; wi dening cri teri a of judgment of archi tects ' competence; bui l di ngs as evi dence . . Research possi bi l i ty , Nobody knows anythi ng about unattached other than names -s such as age distributi on , sex , geographi cal di str i buti on , type of employment , reason for bei ng unattached , att i tudes to practi ce , education etc. , how d id they become unattached - from start , l ef t const i tutent body f etc . Coul d be found out by proper l y constructed survey and anal ysi s. Apply for an ARCIJK research award t G do thi s? Who shoul d appl i cant be? TAM Gl asgow B. 6. 8B Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource S McManus Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived JA Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 24.6.88 https://nam.maydayrooms.org/files/original/101c5aba006926f257c6f82d1dbe0449.pdf 633a897e5f3442d2fd73e4e7524356d4 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Professional Issues Description An account of the resource A cohort of NAM members became engaged with the professional registration body, standing as elected councillors on the Architects Registration Council and its various committees. Hitherto entirely dominated by the RIBA bloc, the Council began to yield to a new dynamic through NAM's involvement, enabling fresh perspectives on such issues as mandatory fee scales, greater lay representation on the body, ethically-based standards of professional conduct, etc. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource JA Letter to Registrar Subject The topic of the resource JA Letter to Registrar with comments on ARCUK's draft annual report for 1986-87 (3 pp total) Description An account of the resource Kenneth Forder, Esa The Registrar AcR.C.UaK: 73 Hall am Street London WIN 6EE Dear Kenneth Forder, Re: A. ReCaUnKc -- Annual In accordance with the requiret-aent, I append a few comments on the Draft Annual Report , in advance of Wednesday t s Council Meeting. I hope these are of a.ssistance in final ising the report. JOHN ALLAN _jonn Allan M.A (Edin Hons., DIP. Arch., MA. (Sheffield), Architect. Richard [Orton B A, B Arch , (Ncle)., RI B A., john Cooper B A. (Cantab.) DIP Arch , Architect Justin DeSyl!as M.Sc , (UCL), AA DIP , Architect, Geraldine CYRIordan B Arch (Dublin UCD) Architect A cc) operdttve Practtcc registered under tne industrial & Provident Societies Act 1965 Registration No 23270k VAT Registration No 350 6289 55 JOHN ALLAN Comments on Draft Annual Report. ARCUK 1986—87 12 . 2nd Para. Suggest "It should be known by all registered persons that they are legally required to keep ARCUK informed • etc. 17 . No Indication of result, or whether this is still awaited. 20. First sentence misleadingly negative In tone. I would prefer after " • • • Standard." something like "has superseded a set of purely formal rules with a system of qualitative criteria" Then after second sentence I would insert an additional sentence such as, "By contrast, application of the new Standard obliges those considering a case to examine the content of allegedly disgraceful conduct against the yardstick of Integrity as defined In the Standard and supported in Advice to Architects. Then 4th sentence would start "As a result of this replacement. . etc " Remainder of item 20. My personal view is that this account is slightly and unnecessarily biased towards the Discipline Committee, who — again in my personal opinion, and based only on the D.C. Chairman's 'visit' to Council — have still not really grasped the significance of the change and their increased obligations resulting from it. (I think I voiced such feelings at the time). The Impression given in this report, which may well be the true one, is that ARCUK f s disciplinary procedures are in a muddle. If so this is extremely serious and requires the most urgent attention, especially at a time when almost all 'Internal systems of disciplining — from the professions to the police force — are the subject of so much public misgiving. I hope this matter will be Item 1 on the P. P.C. 's agenda next session. Incidentally, I think it would be appropriate to make reference to the work already done in systematising ARCUK t s review of conduct and discipline — I mean the guidance paper "Procedure, Precedents and Policy", which was after all Intended to address exactly the questions discussed above. 27/28 - No mention of phasing out of ARCUK's recognition of overseas schools. I would be interested to know if any of those dealt with by the Reg. 27 Panel were applicants that would previously have been admitted via the t old ' route. 31 Last parae Economical with the truth? The E . E. C. Directive may well be more onerous than the current de facto procedure fo r recognition, but I am not convinced that the 1931 Act could be properly construed as requiring anything else but a 'direct involvement in the accreditation of qualifications. 33. No indication of the outcome — were the Board's conclusions too controversial to risk reporting, or too uninteresting to merit it? Appendix 4 Notes to Accounts - Item 11 . Any particular reason why unattached election was so much cheaper this year. (Presumably nothing to do with the fact I was not a candidate) .� Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource JA Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived JA Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 16.3.87 https://nam.maydayrooms.org/files/original/b9c8efb22694013f33b0b790acec8b37.pdf 6ea27b95abe8e426523a554c86e803b6 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Professional Issues Description An account of the resource A cohort of NAM members became engaged with the professional registration body, standing as elected councillors on the Architects Registration Council and its various committees. Hitherto entirely dominated by the RIBA bloc, the Council began to yield to a new dynamic through NAM's involvement, enabling fresh perspectives on such issues as mandatory fee scales, greater lay representation on the body, ethically-based standards of professional conduct, etc. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Papers for Fifty-fifth Annual Meeting of ARCUK Council Subject The topic of the resource Papers for Fifty-fifth Annual Meeting of ARCUK Council (28 pp total) Description An account of the resource 73 Hallam Street London WI N 6EE Tel: 01-580 5861 Registrar. Kenneth J. Forder M.A. 41/87 FIFTY-FIFTH ANNUAL MEETING 18 MARCH 1987 AT 66 PORTLAND PLACE LONDON WI Note: This meeting will start as soon as the 220th Ordinary Meeting has ended. (An ARCUK tree is attached for nev Members of the Council) A G E N D A Apologies for Absence 2, The Council 'To constitute the Council in accordance with the appointments listed as Annex A 3 . Appo intment of Chairman and Vice Chairman Board Committees and Panels etc. To constitute Board and Committees- — see lists attached as Annex B & C To authorize the present members of the Awards Panel and General Purposes Committee to the Board of Architectural Education to continue to serve in these capacities respectively. See lists attached as Annex B Pc 11 (c ) To authorize the present members of the Advisory Panel on Admission to the Register of Persons with Commonwealth or Foreign Qualif ications under Regulation 27 to continue to serve in this capaa it y pending the next meeting of the Board of Architectural Education and Admission Committee 5. Cont inuation in office of the Chairman of the Board and Committees until new appointments are Inade at the first meet ings in the new Session 6 . Dates of Meet ings To approve the provisional l ist Annex D Any Other Business Registrar: Kenneth J. Forder M.A. 43/87 COUNCIL MEMBERSHIP 1986/87 AND 1987/88 Members marked (R) are due to retire on 18 March 1988, those marked (A) are appointed on the same date. Nominating Authority Member(s) FRIAS, FRTPI, FCIOB MIA (R) Miss N D Beddington, MBE, RIBA, FSIA K S Bingham, RIBA N M Bri 11, MSC (London), Dip Arch (Leeds), RIBA R S Critchlow, Dip Arch (Sheffield), RIBA A Cunningham, B Arch (Ľpool), RIBA Mrs R Curry, Dip Arch (Sheffield), RIBA c W Daly, BSc (Hons) Arch, (Belfast), RIBA K Eastham, Dip Arch, Dip TP (Manchester), RIBA R Forsyth, B Arch (Strathclyde) , RIBA, FR IAS G Graham, CBE, MA, PPRIBA R M Greenwood, B Arch (Ľ pool), RIBA, MRTPI D J Gregory, RIBA A J Groves, RIBA P Ha 11, MA Dip Arch (Cantab), RIBA (R) Prof D J Hinton, AA Dip, RIBA A M Horsley, JP, Dip Arch (Leics), ACIArb, RIBA J M Hutchinson, AA Dip, RIBA M W Jeff el s, Dip Arch (Leeds), RIBA P E Jones, Dip TP (London), FRTPI, FRSA, RIBA J A Lane, Dip Arch, (Leics), PRIAS, RIBA (R) M D Lewis, RIBA Dr J Lowman, RIBA J S Mackie, Dip Arch (Sheffield), RIBA (R) Prof R K Macleod, B Arch (Brit Col), RIBA M S McNidder, Dip Arch, Dip TP, RIBA, FRTPI, FBIM M Metcalfe, RIBA 43/87/2 Nominating Authority Member(s) R Parnaby, BArch, MCD (L' pool) s MArch (Oregon), RIBA D A Penning, Dip Arch (The Polytechnic) RIBA Q Pickard, BA (Newcastle), RIBA P W G Powell, Dip Arch (PNL), Dip TP (Lond) , FRTPI, FCIArb, RIBA c W Quick, TD, Dip Arch (Wales) T H Sherlock, AA Dipl, RIBA R C Shrimp 1 in, MA, (Cantab) Dip Arch, R IBA, FRTPI, FCIARB T D Snow, BA, BArch, RIBA Prof J A Tarn, PhD (Cantab), B Arch (Dune 1m) RIBA A M Taylor, Dip Arch (Aberdeen), RIBA K H Taylor, M Sc. , Dip Arch (Birm), RIBA J C Viner, Dip Arch, Dip TP (Birm), MRTPI, RIBA D B Waterhouse, RIBA (R) c K Wearden, B Arch, Dip CD (L' pool) , RIBA (R) T W Wilkinson, Dip Arch (Manc) , RIBA c Williams, DA (Edin) , RIBA F S Wright, MBE, DA (Dundee), RIBA J Wyatt, MA (Cantab), RIBA D M Yorke, B Arch, BA (Hons Arch) (Manc) , RIBA 43/87/3 Nominating Authority Member(s) Ms N A Hughes, BSc (Wales), B Arch (Wales) Dr M Jenks, Dip Arch (Oxford) PhD Ms M E Kelly, BArch, Dip Arch (Hull) Prof A Lipman, B Arch (W' Wrand), MA, PhD Ms S M T McManus, BSc (Belfast), Dip Arch (Hull) Prof T A Markus, MA, M Arch (MIT) , FRSA T A Woolley, B Arch (Hons) (Edinburgh) Society of Engineers ( 1 ) � 43/87/5 BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL EDUCATION 1 - PROVISIONAL MEMBERSHIP 1987/88 (subject to election of the members nominated for that purpose) Statutory Nominations �The Department of Architecture University of Sheffield The Cambr idge University School of Architecture The Department of Architecture University of Nottingham The Department of Architecture Polytechnic of North London The School of Architecture Leicester Polytechnic The School of Architecture The Polytechnic of Central London The School of Architecture University of Newcastle upon Tyne Prof C A St. J Wilson, MA (Arch) (Cantab), Dip Arch (London), RIBA Prof C Riley, MCD, B Arch (L'pool), RIBA Prof T Matoff, RIBA Prof Ben Farmer, DA (Dundee), MA (Bristol), RIBA � Plymouth Polytechnic Prof A Gale Royal College of Art M Dytham Nominations under the Gentlemen' 8 Agreement �Nominationg for free election 16 vacancies: For biographical details see Document �Registrar: Kenneth J. Forder M.A. 43/87/12 1 - PROVISIONAL COFNITTEE MEMBERSHIP 1987/88 (subject to election of the members nominated for that purpose) ADMISSION CObff{1TTEE Statutory Nominations Nominations under the Gentlemen' 8 Agreement Nominations for free election: 3 vacancies For biographical details see document 43/97/22 11 - ADVISORY PANELS AWARDS PANEL Chairman and Vice—Chairman of the Board of Architectural Education (Composition due for review in May 1987) G Atkinson E Benroy Dr I Cooper A Cunningham M Darke D J Gregory M Jenks P Hobb8 Prof T Markus W Paine J Smith Mrs J Symons GPC to BAE Chairman and Vice—Chairman of the Board of Architectural Education (Composition due for review in May 1987) G R Adams B Beckett A Collier Cox C Dean J P Jacob A Lipman R W Paine �DISCIPLINE COIOf1TTEE Statutory Nominations Nominations for free election: 4 vacancies: FINANCE AND GENERAL PURPOSES C020f1TTEE Gentlemen's Agreement Nominations Nominations for free election: 6 vacanc : PROFESSIONAL PURPOSSES COhff1TTEE Gentleman's Agreement Nominations Nominations for free elect ion: 6 vacancies : �43/87/19 BIOGRAPHICAL DETAILS Board of Architectural Education Nominations for free election 43/87/20 William L Forsyth Alan J Groves Alan R Lipman A L Maddison Peter A P Melvin Ingrid M Morris Stanley G Oven John Pringle Kenneth H Taylor Patricia R Tindale Age 37. Unattached. Lecturer, Department of Civic Design, University of Liverpool. ARCUK Member of Council 1984—87, Professional Purposes Committee 1984-85. Chairman of ARCUK Council 1980—83. RIBA Councillor for 13 years. RIBA Vice—President 1974—76. Member of the BAE for 8 years. Leader of Common Market Liaison Group. Architects Directive Steering Group 1985—present date. Worked in Sheffield on housing re—development. County Architect for Cornwall. Age 61 . Unat tached Professor, the Welsh School of Architecture. Presently ARCUK Member of Council and Board of Architectural Education. Pa8t senior Lecturer and Course Tutor, N.E. L.P. School of Architecture. Past Chairman RIBA West Essex Branch. Have served on IAAS Council and Education and Examinations Board. Have represented IAAS on ARCUK Admissions Committee and Board of Education for some years. Founder Partner Melvin Langley & Mark. Eastern Region Member RIBA Council 1977/82. RIBA Vice—President for Promotion 1982/83. RIBA Vice—President for Education and Professional Development 1985 to date. Principal in Private Practice. Member of the AA. Previously ARCUK Council, PPC and Admissions Committee, Private Practice, Glasgow; R IAS Practice and Contracts Committees Scottish Building Contracts Committee; Arbitrations. Director in Private Practice. Member of the Architectural Association. A Principal in Private Practice. Member of ARCUK Council for some 7 years. Previously served as Chairman of Admissions Committee. Member of Regulation 27 Advisory Panel. Architect in Ministry of Education and Department of Environment until March 1986, when retired from position of Chief Architect. Nov consultant in private practice. 43/87/21 �43/87/22 Admission Committee Nominations for free election 43/87/23 Discipline Committee Nominations for free election James R A Blamire Michael D Broad Roger G Brown Anthony Hickman Neil M Jack Michael W Jeffe18 W J Lidbetter 40 years. Unattached. Self—employed architect with Arcade Architects in Edinburgh, working mainly on inner city housing. Previously a salaried architect in central and local government and in private practice both in Britain and the US. ARCUK Council 1982—87. Admissions Committee 1981--83 . Finance and General Purposes Committee 1983—85. New Architecture Movement 1981—82. Previously involved in various student, union and education cormnittees. 36 years. Unattached. Self—emp loyed partner of Mick Broad and Terry Hughes Architects in Edinburgh. Previously with Edinburgh District Council Housing Department and Sir Basil Spence Glover & Ferguson. Member of ARCUK Council 1981—87, also served on Professional Purposes Finance and General Purposes Committee and Admissions Conmittee. Member RIBA Council 1982-5. Member RIBA Professional Conduct Committee 1979—85, Chairman 1982—5. Member RIBA Code Policy Committee 1985—. Regional Architect NW Regional Health Authority 1975-87. Partner in private practice. Secretary—General of Franco British Union of Architects. Justice of the Peace. Architect in Private Practice. Convener R IAS Investigation Committee. Past Chairman, Scottish Branch, CIArb. Experienced arbiter and expert witness. Hoffman Wood Scholar 1953. Partner, Bass and Jeff e 18. Previously County Architect Cambr idgeshire RIBA and ARCUK Council member. Vice—President R IBA, 1985 - 1987. Thirty—six year 8 varied experience — Local Government, Ministry of Works, Chief Architect & Surveyor R.A.C.S. Ltd. (450 staff various disciplines). Private Practice and College Lec turer. Justice of the Peace (1967) supplemental list. Member of Admissions Committee, ARCUK ( some 15 years). Expert witness (liaising with Q. C' s). At present own practice as architect and surveyor. Richard K Eastham Michael W Jeffelg Sheelagh M T McManus John S Mackie Thomas A Markus David A Penning Peter W G Powell T Harley Sherlock Past North West Regional Chairman. Member of Planning Advisory Group, employed as an Architect/ Planner in Local Government Planning Department (A88i8tant County Planning Officer, Lancashire.) Hoffman Wood Scholar 1953. Partner, Bass and Jeffels previously County Architect, Cambr idgeshire. ARCUK Council lore Vice—Preg ident RIBA 1985-1987. Age 27. Unattached. Salaried architect with Matrix Feminist Design Co—operative, London. ARCUK Member of Council 1986—87, Admissions 1986-87. Partner in Practice of Hugh Wilson & Lewis Worms ley (Middlesbrough Office). Past Chairman RIBA Northern Region & Tees ide Branch. Chairman RIBA Housing Advisory Group. Age 58. Unattached. Professor Emeritus, Department of Building Science, University of Strathclyde. ARCUK Member of Council 1984—86, Board of Architectural Education 1986—87 and prev ious 1 y. Age 58. Member R IBA. Associate Regional Architect with National Westminster Bank. Committee member with Architects in Industry and Commerce. Member ARCUK Council 1977/86. Member of Finance and General Purposes 1979/86. Partner in Private Practice. Registered Architect and ARIBA 1951 . FRI BA 1968. Treasurer, Hertfordshire Association of Architects 1973—1980. Treasurer, Eastern Region RIBA 1979/84. Principal in private practice. Chairman London Region 1984—1986. Member RIBA Council 1981—1987. Member RIBA Finance Committee 1981—1987 . Adrian M Horsley Michael Jenks Mary E Kelly Quentin Pickard Roger C Shrimp lin Angus M Taylor David B Waterhouse David M Yorke Partner in Private Practice since 1978 — Gelder & Kitchen. Past President North Humber 8 ide Society of Architects. Past Chairman Yorkshire Region. Member of the RIBA Professional Conduct Conmittee. Justice of the Peace Associate of the Institute of Arbitrators, Age 41. Unattached. Research Fellow and Senior Lecturer, Oxford Polytechnic. ARCUK Member of Council 1984—87, Board of Architectural Education 1985-87. Age 29. Unat tached. Salaried architect with Bradford Technical Aid Service. ARCUK Member of Council 1986—87, Finance and General Purposes Conmittee 1986—87. Member, R IBA. On ARCUK Council and Professional Purposes Committee since 1985. Partner in private practice since 1978. Chairman (1984), Junior Liaison Organisation. Member of 'Aqua' Group. RIBA Contracts Conmittee. Member of ARCUK Council 1985—86. Past Chairman and Past Chairman and Past Secretary RIBA Bedfordshire Association of Architects. Past Member Eastern Region Council. Member RIBA Planning Advisory Group. Member of RIBA Overseas Affairs Committee and past member of European Liaison Group. Age 53. Principal Private Practice — 30 years. Member ARCUK Council, RIBA Council, RIAS Council. Past President Aberdeen Society of Architects and a Council member and member of its Practice Conmlittee. Age 65. Member R IBA. Retired from private practice. Past Chairman of ARCUK. Member P PC and Admissions Committee. Age 39. Salaried Architect in Local Government. ARCUK Council Member s ince 1979. Member of Professional Purposes Committee Since 1981. �Annex 204/06 ARCI[ITECTS REGISTRATIOII COUNCIL OF UNITED P roar raidi.le for 1907—1988 DAY COUliCIL/C'Oli111TTEE 1987� Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource ARCUK Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived JA Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 18.3.87 https://nam.maydayrooms.org/files/original/5adbd893578ad20a9fc1cf2712f307a0.pdf 65f3ac609b66505e0f9208471a7a46c6 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Professional Issues Description An account of the resource A cohort of NAM members became engaged with the professional registration body, standing as elected councillors on the Architects Registration Council and its various committees. Hitherto entirely dominated by the RIBA bloc, the Council began to yield to a new dynamic through NAM's involvement, enabling fresh perspectives on such issues as mandatory fee scales, greater lay representation on the body, ethically-based standards of professional conduct, etc. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Letter from John Allan to Building Design Subject The topic of the resource Letter from John Allan to Building Design "RIBA v ARCUK - Fighting a losing Battle" (2 pp.) Description An account of the resource Dear Slr, RIBA — v — ARCUK : Fight Ing a losing battle Recent reports of a new RIBA offensive on ARCUK should both dismay and alert those who have been working for its emancipation and reform over the last ten years. At the same time others unfamiliar with the ARCUK story should be aware that such hostility Is but the latest episode In the Institute's long and losing battle to retain surrepti— t Ious control of the Registration Council. In the mid 1970 v s when the elected representatives of Unattached Architects first engaged the problem, the Council's relationship to the RIBA could most charitably be described as one of abject thralldom. Whether through collective amnesia or pure ignorance, any Independent perception of ARCIJK's statutory responsibilities had simply ceased to exist. Thus our Initial interventions, however green, met with absurd over—reaction, dubious manipulation of procedures, or verbal thuggery In open council. Besides the serious abuse of power, some incidents took on a wholly comic alre 1 remember the moment of baffled outrage when I first contested (unsuc— cesfully of course) the post of chair at one of the committees , followed by reluctant rummaging through the stationery cupboard to see if ARCUK possessed such a thing as ballot papers. Whilst I never actually used the referee's whistle I used to carry into the Council chamber, It Is perhaps worth recording that by the late 1970's the Unattached were taking legal advice on obtaining a High Court injunction on ARCUk's operations — a course of action only terminated through lack of funds. Much has changed since those dark days, albeit at a painfully slow pace, partly through external pressures, and partly — I should like to think — as a result of the efforts of the Unattached (plus a few honourable mavericks too Intelligent to be taken in by the party line) . In responding to such issues as the Monopolies Commission Investigation, the new Standard of Conduct, the Esher Report and the E.E.C. Directive, ARCUK has begun to distinguish Its role from that of the professional associations. Moreover recently, under untypical— Iy non—partisan chairmanship, speakers of any viewpoint are assured of a fair hearing, thus bringing welcome diversity to both Council and BAE more respresentatlve of their respective membership • John Allan M.A. (Edin.), B.A. Hons., Dip. Arch., M.A. (Sheffield), Architect. Richard Barton B.A., B.Arch., (Ncle)., R.I.B.A., John Cooper B.A. (Cantab.) Dip. Arch., Architect. Justin DeSyllas M.Sc., (UCL), AA Dip., Architect, Geraldine O'Riordan B.Arch.(Dublin UCD) Architect. A Co-operative Practice registered under the Industrial & Provident Societies Act 1965 Registration No.23270R. It is both consistent with and central to this process of reform that ARCUK should seek to re—establish control of educational recognition, after the hijacking of this function by the RIBA In the mid 1960's. It Is indeed a statutory duty under the 1931 Act, and for the RIBA to disparage this as 'Interference' Is either disingenuous or merely ignorant. And If the Institute finds it objectionable that ARCIJK appoints Its own Education Officer or vets the new RIBA examination, it has only Itself to blame for the years of arrogant Intransigence that have now provoked such a resolute response. As for the unfortu— nate fall guys, my advice would be to Immediately become unattached, stand for election, and avail themselves of the advantages of democracy As I retire after ten years as an elected councillor, it Is rather a depressing prospect that valuable time and energy now seems likely to be wasted in fighting over old ground that has already been won, thereby diverting attention from new and more fruitful lines of progress. Yet RIBA blimps must realize that any attempts to return ARCUK to the old ways will be resisted — not only by the Unattached who now know the game, but by other interests In Council and BAE who have discovered that the RIBA is not a reliable ally In times of political pressure. The government appointees have likewise necessarily adopted a higher supervisory profile in view of ARCUK's enlarged E.E.C. duties, and even the press has a positive part to play in giving effective coverage to ARCUK t s affairs, including reportage of deliberate fouls. Instead of trying to tUTn the clock back, RIBA would—be saboteurs should overcome their fear of change, recognlse that the Institute's period of hegemony Is ending and seek a constructive contribution in ARCUK's overdue transition from wardship to adulthood. Yours faithfully, JOHN S ALLAN Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource JA Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived JA Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2.3.87 https://nam.maydayrooms.org/files/original/641d0ed1e1b3124a29551b8b4d642486.pdf f36a79876d8d8622ae209c1c11554e83 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Professional Issues Description An account of the resource A cohort of NAM members became engaged with the professional registration body, standing as elected councillors on the Architects Registration Council and its various committees. Hitherto entirely dominated by the RIBA bloc, the Council began to yield to a new dynamic through NAM's involvement, enabling fresh perspectives on such issues as mandatory fee scales, greater lay representation on the body, ethically-based standards of professional conduct, etc. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Notice and Nomination Form for Election of Members of Council Subject The topic of the resource Notice and Nomination Form for Election of Members of Council (2 pages) Description An account of the resource A Notice, Confidential Architects Registration Council of the United Kingdom Election of Members of the Council for the year ending in March, 1988, under Paragraph 1 (vii) of the First Schedule to the Architects (Registration) Act, 1931. This document is intended only for registered persons who are 'unattached Architects'; that is to say, those who on the 31st October 1986 were not 'architect members'of any of the following Constituent Bodies, or of their provincial associations: the Royal Institute of British Architects, the Incorporated Association of Arch itects and Surveyors, the Faculty of Architects and Surveyors, the Arch itecturai Association of London, and the Stamp Section of UCATT. (The term 'members' comprises Corporate Members (including Fellows, Associates and Licentiates). Students, honorary, corresponding, and retired members are not regarded as frnembers', and if their names are on the Register of Architects they are classified as 'unattached'.) The Regulations governing the Election are Nos. 43, 44 and 45 of the Council's Regulations. If this document is sent to you in error, please return it to the Registrar with particulars of your membership of the Constituent Body concerned. On the 31st October, 1986 there were 6390 'unattached' registered persons on the Voters' List, which' entitles the unattached Architects to elect 13 representatives on the Council for the year ending March, 1988 i.e. in the proportion of one for every 500, or fraction thereof. The following representatives were holding office on 31st October, 1986 and are willing to serve again if nominated and elected. meetings attended out of a possible You are invited to complete the enclosed nomination form, which, in order to be valid, must reach the Electoral Reform Society (who are acting for the Council in this matter) not later than the first day of January, 1987. No person is el igible as a candidate for election unless he is nominated by not less than six unattached Arch itects; a candidate may not nominate himself. (Regs. 44(b) and 45(3).) Nominations must be made on the official form enclosed with this notice. (Regs. 44(c) and 45(3).) An election by ballot will be held if the number of candidates nominated exceeds 13 but not otherwise. If an election by ballot is held, a voting paper will be sent in due course to every person on the voters' list who has not renounced his voting rights in accordance with Regulations 45(1 1). By order of the Council, Kenneth J. Forder, Registrar 73 Hallam Street, London, WI N 6EE November 1986 B Nomination Form.ConfidentiaI Architects Registration Council of the United Kingdom Election of Members of the Council for the year ending in March, 1988, under Paragraph 1 (vii) of the First Schedule to the Architects (Registration) Act, 1931. 'Unattached Architects' wishing to nominate registered persons as candidates for election as members of the Council for the year ending March, 1988, must complete this form and return it, together with the consent of each nominee (expressing his willingness, if elected, to serve), and a statement under the hand of each nominee (giving the following information in not more than 200 words: (i) age: (ii) date of admission to the Register of Architects; (iii) names of Architectural Constituent Bodies of which candidate is a member (if any); (iv) present professional post (e.g. partner, chief architect, salaried architect, including the name of the firm or employer) and previous professional experience; (v) committee experience (architectural or otherwise); and (vi) personal statement (if any), to reach the offices of the Electoral Reform Society not later than the first day of January, 1987. Any nomination form received after that date, or any nomination not made on this officia/ form, wi// be invalid. (Regs. 44(c) and 45(3).) Nominations I hereby nominate* the following registered persons as candidates for election as above stated, and attach hereto their respective written consents and statementst. (Full names of persons nominated must be given). Signature Serial Number Date *Not more than 13 may be nominated. t In the event of the same candidate being nominated by more than one person, it is not necessary for more than one written consent or statement to be forwarded in respect of that candidate. N.B. This nomination list will not be valid unless it is received at the Electoral Reform Society's offices not later than the first day of January, 1987. To:—- The Electoral Reform Society, 6 Chancel Street, London SEI OUU. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource ARCUK Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived JA Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource Undated https://nam.maydayrooms.org/files/original/408ff8a982fcfac5ba02a685cc4f6ffe.pdf 58213e41a51371619a4081a3a14db231 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Professional Issues Description An account of the resource A cohort of NAM members became engaged with the professional registration body, standing as elected councillors on the Architects Registration Council and its various committees. Hitherto entirely dominated by the RIBA bloc, the Council began to yield to a new dynamic through NAM's involvement, enabling fresh perspectives on such issues as mandatory fee scales, greater lay representation on the body, ethically-based standards of professional conduct, etc. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Note on membership of ARCUK advisory panels Subject The topic of the resource 2 page note on membership of ARCUK advisory panels Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource ARCUK Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived JA Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 5. 3. 87 https://nam.maydayrooms.org/files/original/4818128c3b7b8a9d706737880f38cc64.pdf 4f92ac88c303ff55c4502dcaf0b38620 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Professional Issues Description An account of the resource A cohort of NAM members became engaged with the professional registration body, standing as elected councillors on the Architects Registration Council and its various committees. Hitherto entirely dominated by the RIBA bloc, the Council began to yield to a new dynamic through NAM's involvement, enabling fresh perspectives on such issues as mandatory fee scales, greater lay representation on the body, ethically-based standards of professional conduct, etc. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Helping ARCUK reach maturity Subject The topic of the resource "Helping ARCUK reach maturity" Letter to Building Design from JA Description An account of the resource Letters elping Arcuk reach maturity sponding to such issues as the Monopolies Commission investigation, the new standard of conduct, the Esher Report and the EEC directive, Arcuk has begun to distinguish its role from that of the professional associations. Moreover recently, under untypically nonpartisan chairmanship, speakers of any viewpoint arc assured of a fair hearing, thus bringing welcome diversity to both council and the Board of Architectural Education and becoming more representative. It is both consistent with and central to this process of reform that Arcuk should seek to reestablish control of educational recognition, after the hijacking of this function by the RIBA in the mid-1960s. It is indeed a statutory duty under the 1931 Act, and for the RIBA to disparage this as "interference" is either disingenuous or merely ignorant. And if the institute finds it objectionable that Arcuk appoints its own education officer or vets the new RIBA examination, it has only itself to blame for the years of arrogant intransigence. As I retire after 10 years as an elected councillor, it is rather a depressing prospect that valuable timc and energy now seem likely to be wasted in fightin over old ground that has alreac% been won, thereby divertinc attention from new and more fruitful lines of progress. Yet RIBA blimps must realise that any attempts to return Arcuk to the old ways will be resisted — not only by the unattached who now know the game, but by other interests in council and BAE which have discovered that the RIBA is not a reliable ally in times of political pressure. Government appointees have likewise necessarily adopted a higher supervisory profile in view of Arcuk's enlarged EEC duties, and even the press has a positive part to play in giving effective coverage to Arcuk's affairs, including reportage of deliberate fouls. Instead of trying to turn the clock back, RIBA would-be saboteurs should overcome their fear of change, recognise that the institute's period of hegemony is ending and make a constructive contribution to Arcuk's overdue transition from wardship to adulthood. John Allan London N7 Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource JA Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived JA Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1987 https://nam.maydayrooms.org/files/original/477fb45ddfe2347747d46172e3b06f16.pdf 3fb6f383652a7d1bffe0d22372ddfd89 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Professional Issues Description An account of the resource A cohort of NAM members became engaged with the professional registration body, standing as elected councillors on the Architects Registration Council and its various committees. Hitherto entirely dominated by the RIBA bloc, the Council began to yield to a new dynamic through NAM's involvement, enabling fresh perspectives on such issues as mandatory fee scales, greater lay representation on the body, ethically-based standards of professional conduct, etc. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Who needs the RIBA? Subject The topic of the resource "Who needs the RIBA ?" Article by Patrick Harrison, RIBA Secretary + letter from Mike Jencks Description An account of the resource RIBA? PATRICK HARRISON. THE MAN BEHIND THE SCENES AT THE RIBA, REACTS TO DAVID ROEBUCK'S TALK. TRANSPOSED IN THE LAST ISSUE. WITHOUT REFERING DIRECTLY TO THE TEXT. HE GIVES US AN INSIGHT INTO HOW THE PROFESSION VIEWS ITSELF. statutory body ARCUK for tho democratically controlled RIBA. And tho RIBA is gonuinoly democratic. Its record in responding to tho public interest and changes in public nood is far in advance of most comparable professional institutions. Its Council, Presidency and policios can and do respond to tho vigorous shake thoy rocoivo from membors. It is governed not only by 'bosses' but by many distinguished and able members, a tot of them salaried architects, who have chosen a modest path. Its work is well researched and well prosentod. It is effective. If it bo argued that the RIBA doesn't always win it must be rorncmbered that tho battles in which it is engaged aro very long and difficult. that victory can seldom bo spectacular and is often best not celebrated too ostentatiously. The moral Novor lot it be forgotton that tho forces ranged against good architecturo and good architects are very powerful. Tho distrust and suspicion of tho creative artist in industry and politics. oro intense. A truly disinterested professional servico also gets in tho way of short-term economics and convenience. This accounts as much for government scrutiny of architects as any interest in the welfaro of tho consumer, Do not imagino that tho world will automatically accord on offectivo rolo to a deinstitutionalised orofnssion. It will most likely out-manoouvro and ignoro it! Subvorgion can bo fun, but at con In this siutuotion. the thesis goos on. many talented and socially responsible salaried orchitocts are compelled simply to operate the svstom and are prevented from helping thoso who need them most. Oavid Roebuck therefore proposed that architects should remain 'unattached' and use ARCIJK to dislodge the RIBA from its dominance and so allow a more through Royal Commissions. tho Monopolies and Mergers Commission and Office of Fair Trtiding, from time to time call professions to account. Somo members of the RIBA certainly forget that the principal object of the Charter of 1837 is the advancement of architecture. not of architects. It is also true that the professions and the communist block. is notalso be dangerous. Architecturo �Faculty of Architecture. Planning & Estate Management Faculty Short Course unit Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource P Harrison Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived JA Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1986 https://nam.maydayrooms.org/files/original/96449421faf7c88334223dfa209bc0ce.pdf 591121333cc25ff416a3d723e029bd48 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Professional Issues Description An account of the resource A cohort of NAM members became engaged with the professional registration body, standing as elected councillors on the Architects Registration Council and its various committees. Hitherto entirely dominated by the RIBA bloc, the Council began to yield to a new dynamic through NAM's involvement, enabling fresh perspectives on such issues as mandatory fee scales, greater lay representation on the body, ethically-based standards of professional conduct, etc. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Statutory Instrument re Architects' Qualifications Subject The topic of the resource Statutory Instrument re Architects' Qualifications (EEC Recognition Order) 1987 (18 pp.) Description An account of the resource The Queen's Present, Most Excellent Majesty in Council Her Majesty, in exercise of the powers conferred on Her by section 2(2) of the European Communities Act 1972 (a), is pleased, by and with the advice of Her Privy Council, to order, and it is herehy ordered, as follows:- Citation ana commencement Lie This order may be citeg as the Architects! Qualifications (EEC Recognition) Order 1987 and Shall come into Operation on 4th August 1987. DRAFT 5.12.86 1987 No.| ARCHITECTS ~) a<ameenaeR RecN eRpepeneeEeenva Interpretation STATUTORY InN STRUMENTS The Architects! Qualifications (EEC Recognition) Order 1987 Made Cee emetic iinses Laid before Parliament ....... Coming into Operation 4th August 1987 At the Court at Buckingham Palace, the day of 1987. 2. In this order - zB Q C Oo oO o Q k- n ct at my ct - cf if) a3 hy cy we ' ct (D (2) ui cf rea) J? =4j © mM | ct oo @ ye Q ct —_—_ t 2. ERR SERASASta oY "the Council" means the Architects Registration Council of the United Kingdom; "the discipline committee" means the discipline committee of 2 the Council;.,. Uh Bae aes "the Directive" means European Communities Council Directive No. 85/384/EE(Ca) on the mutual recognition of diplomas, certificates and other evidence of formal qualifications in architecture; Recognition of Furopean Community architectural qualifications 3. At the end of section 2 of the Act (Interpretation) there shall be inserted the following definitions - "national" in relation to a member State means the same as in the Community Treaties, but does not include a person who, by virtue of article 2 of Protocol No. 3 (Channel Islands and the Isle of Man) to the Treaty of Accession (b) is not to benefit from Community provisions relating to the free. movement of persons and services; "the register" means the register of architects maintained under the Act. "The expression "the Directive" means the European Communities Council Directive No. 85/384/EEC on the mutual recognition of diplomas, certificate and other evidence of formal qualifications in architecture, as amended by European Communities Council Directives Nos. 85/614/EEC and 86/17/EEC; The expression "competent authority" means an authority or body designated by a member State in accordance with the Directive; (a) O.0. No. L233, 21.8.85, p.15, as amended by Council Directive 85/614/EEC, 0.7. No. L376, 31.12.85, p.1 and supplemented by Counci Directive S6/LI/ESC, Owls NGs L327, 1.2.86, p.71l. (b) see Cmnd. 5179 - I, p.247. section - "Qualifications for registration 6A.-(1) Subject to the provisions in register architects: of section 1972, a person Act and any Order in Council of this made under 2(2) of the who is a national either - European Communities of a member Act A RURRRINESRIE TSOi ave BREDSARETRENETHeoOnbe PiesaTact FSS ATRL tp ngs dele) et 1 The expression "national" in relation to a member State means the same as in the ‘Community Treaties, but does not include a 2 person who, by virtue, of article 2 of Protocol No. 3 (Channel “Islands and Isle of Man) to the Treaty of Accession is not to benefit. from Community provisions Fer seing, £9: the free movement of persons. and services." 4. In section 5(2)(a) and section 5(3) of the Act, the words "section 6 of" shall be inserted after the word "under", 5. After section 6 of the Act (right to registration in the register of architects) there shall be inserted the following European Qualifica- tions State, and who satisfies the requirements as to qualifications set out in subsection (2), and as the case may be, the requirements as to practical training experience or profession experience set out in subsection (3), shall on application made to the Council in the prescribed manner and on payment of the (2) The requirements as to qualifications referred to in subsection (1) are that a person - prescribed fee, be entitled to be registered under this Act. (a) holds a qualification listed in (i) the Fourth Schedule to this Act (European Community qualifications in AYA apne .r aronivtecture); or ww (3) nh wad AMA tg IE TNC ae (a4) the Fifth Schedule to this Act (established a European. Community: rights), “where the course (of study ton’ has ree started: no (b) holds a certificate issued by a competent authority of a member State, in accordance with article 12 of the Directive; stating that he has been, no later than the date on which that member State implemented the Directive, authorisebdy that member State to use the title of architect, and that he has effectively carried out the activities of an architect for at least three consecutive years during the five years preceding the issue of such Certificate; or of his distinguished achievements in the subsection (1) are that - later than the beginning of the third academic year starting after 5th August 1985; or (Cc) holds a certificate issueg by a competent authority of a member State in accordance with article 5(1) of the Directive stating that he is, by reason field of architecture, entitled to use the title of architect. The requirements as to practical training experience or professional experience referred to in (a) in the case of a person holding a qualification listed in Part I of the Fourth Schedule or Part I of the a> bry rh 7 re: ing duly made vices « Directive, that, he has gained, at least: is in that member + supervision an architect in . two years practical training experience State under the of a person established that member State; as BhBSSAL + Schedule to this Act, that person shall hold a certificate issued by a competent authority of a member State stating, in. accordance with article 23 of the (b) in the case of a person holding a qualification listed in Part II of the Fourth Schedule or part II of the Fifth. Schedule to this Act that person shall hola a certificate issued by a competent authority in the Federal Republic of Germany stating, in accordance with article 4(1) of the Directive, that at least 4 years appropriate professional experience has been acquired in the Federal Republic of Germany. (4) Where a person holds a certificate issued by a competent authority of the Federal Republic of Germany stating that a qualification awarded to that person by an institution in the German Democratic Republic after 8th May 1945 is of equivalent effect to a qualification listed in the Fourth or the Fifth Schedule to this Act, that person shall, for the purposes of this Act, be deemed to hold a qualification listed in the Fourth or the Fifth Schedule, as the case may be, to this Act. (5) The Council shall ensure that the decision with respect to any application for registration under this section is made and communicated to the applicant within three months of an application (D Ol in the UK and 1Aba 6 ee SregemtQ $58 (6) If, pursuant to articles 17(4) or 18(2) of the Directive, the Council consult a member State in respect of an application under this: section, the period mentioned in paragraph (5) _ Shall, be. extended by |such period. as.May, elapse.” Peceen the ‘initial consultation and the receipt by the Gouncil of a final reply from that member state." 6. There shall be inserted after the Third Schedule to the Act the Schedules set out in the Schedule hereto. Effect of disqualification in another member State on registration’ 7. After section 7 of the Act (removal of name from register) there shall be inserted the following section - "7JA.- (1) A disqualifying decision in another member State in respect of a person is a decision made by a competent authority in that State, which - (a) is expressed to be made on the grounds that he has committed a criminal offence or has misconducted himself in a professional respect; (b) has in that State the effect either that he is no longer registered or otherwise officially recognised as an architect, or that he is prohibited from practising there. (2) The Council may reject an application by any person for registration under section 6A if they are satisfied that there is, at the date of his application, a disqualifying decision in another member State in force in respect of that person. BR IE SMBS and still is subject to that disqualifying decision, may remove Councilo,n being satisfied. thatthe person was at. that time; (5) If a person who is registered under section 6A becomes subject to a disqualifying decision in another member State expressed to be made on the grounds that he has misconducted himself in a professional respect, and if the discipline committee, after an inquiry in respect of that person, report to the Council that he has been guilty of conduct disgraceful to him in his Capacity as an architect, the Council may exercise their powers under section 7 (removal of name from register) accordingly. (6) Section 7 and regulations made under section 13 for the regulation of disciplinary Proceedings shall have effect, with any necessary modifications, in relation to any inquiries “, ° (3) If a person's name was entered on the register by virtue of section 6A at a time when there was a disqualifying decision | _in anothermember state in force in respect of that person, ands” if at that time the Council were unaware of that fact, the his name from the register, (4) Ifa person who is registered under section 6A becomes subject to a disqualifying decision in another member State expressed to be made on the grounds that he has committed a criminal offence, he shall be deemea to have committed that offence and the Council may exercise their powers under section 7 (removal of name from register) accordingly. made under this section. (7) If a person is refused registration or has his name removed from the register by the Council under this section then the Council shall, on request by that person, state in writing the grounds for the refusal or removal.! ~ fordee ~~. e hagedCAE Te yee baat ieee ae ose Resgesrie | Caee Ae Ifhecomplies’withthebsa realof.thisarticle, eRRET ek SRR ty Rights of architects established in other member States to provide services in the United Kingdom it. shall. be. ,pawtul for, a (Person. who is. a national of. any member .. State and is established. as an ‘architect ina ember State other _than the United Kingdom to provide services under a name or title containing the word architect" while visiting the United Kingdom without being registered under the Act. (2) Before providing any such services the person concerned shall supply to the Council - (b) a certificate (or certificates), issued by an authority or body designated by a member State in which he is established as competent for the purposes of article 22(3) of the Directive (provision of services), showing - (i) that he is lawfully pursuing activities in the field of architecture in a member State other than the United Kingdon, to recognise, and (a) a declaration in writing giving particulars of the services to be provided and the period or periods in which he expects to provide them; and (ii) that he holds qualifications in architecture which member States are required by the Directive (iii) that, in the case of a person holding qualifications listed in the Fourth Schedule or the Fifth Schedule to the Act, he has gained practical training experience or appropriate professional experience satisfying the requirements of section 6A(3) of the Act. Kingdom; or ~ ——=§ = aie Bs cup2. Kab aoe pew 2aA aA 2 BYS NOUBASaAE tae Ses -. No such certificate shall be supplied to the Council more than 12 months after the date on which it was issued. Where a person complies with the requirements of - the. Council. shall. enrol his. name, on the: list es of visiting EEC architects maintained for the purposes of this - “article for such period or periods as, having regard to the particulars given in,the declaration referred to in paragraph (2) (a) above, it considers appropriate. (4) The Council shall maintain, for the purposes of this article, in addition to the register, a list of the names of visiting EEC architects enrolled from time to time under this article, with their qualifications and the periods for which their respective enrolments are effective. The Council shall permit any person to inspect the list during normal working hours. (5) No fee shall be charged for enrolment under this article as a visiting EEC architect. (6) Paragraph (1) does not apply to a person, and that person shall not be enrolled as a visiting EEC architect, at a time when he is subject - (a) to a disqualifying decision in another member State; or (b) to a period of disqualification from registration imposed by the Council under section 7 of the Act. (7) Enrolment of a person as a visiting EEC architect shall cease and his name shall be removed from the list of visiting EEC architects if.- (a) he becomes established as an architect in the United Use of Academic title 10. A person who is - (a) registered under section 6A of the Act, or 10 1. (b) he renders services in the United Kingdom under. a name or title containing the, word "architect" otherwise “S. than’ in| accordance with a declaration made. ‘by him under . - paragraph (2) (a)i_ox Se he may no donese Pewearny pursue activities in. the field of architecture in the member State referred _ to in paragraph 2(b) (i). Disciplinary provisions affecting architects who provide services while visiing the United Kingdom 9. Section 7 of the Act and regulations made under section 13 of the Act for the regulation of disciplinary proceedings shall apply to a person who is or has been enrolled under article 8 as a visiting EEC architect as if that person had been registered under section 6 of the Act, and references to "a registered person", "the register" and "registration under the Act" shall be construed accordingly. (b) enrolled under article 8 as a visiting EEC architect; shall, when using his academic title or any abbreviations thereof, express such title or abbreviation in the language or one of the languages of the member State conferring the title, and shall follow the title or any abbreviation thereof with the name and location of the body conferring the title. se *wpouRTH SCHEDULE e | ; PARTI = 8Sis PART II Germany : new Schedules to be inserted in _the Act. ) = ce ‘ < I . 2 Pe oe ar ae 4 {Part I will contain a list of qualifications awarded by other member States, except those awarded following the three year courses of "Fachhochschulen" in the Federal Republic of Germany, which member States are required by article 2 of the Directive to recognise. That list is not yet available.] Diplomas awarded by the departments of architecture (Architektur/Hochbau) of "Fachhochschulen" where the course leading to the award of such Diploma is of three years duration. FIFTH SCHEDULE ESTABLISHED EUROPEAN COMMUNITY RIGHTS PART I Belgium - the diplomas awarded by the higher national schools of - the diplomas awarded by the higher provincial school of architecture of Hasselt (architect); - the diplomas awarded by the Royal Academies of Fine Arts (architecte-architect); SCHEDULE article 6 architecture or the higher national institutes of architecture (architecte-architect); architect); Denmark m= France ant mant amAs HARE TK J 3yn a - the Government architect's diploma = An oh + wan 7 wee =+ Or Education until _- 1OQn5 ao 19453, = ad + _ a sunsequentiy _- co © ~_ by the Ministry + of = awarded py tne Ministry Qu of architect (architecte-architect); - diplomas awarded by the Higher Schools of Civil Engineering (bygningskonstruktor, accompanied by a certificate from the competent authorities to the effect that the person concerne has passed a test of his formal qualifications in accordanc (D - the diplomas awarded by the 'ecoles Saint-Luc! (architecte- - university diplomas in civil engineering, accompanied by a trainee-ship certificate awarded by the association of architects entitling the holder to hold the professional title - the diplomas in architecture awarded by the central or State examining board for architecture (architecte-architect) ; - the civil engineering/architecture diplomas and architecture/engineering diplomas awarded by the faculties of applied sciences of the universities and by the Polytechnical Faculty of Mons (ingénieur-architecte, ingenieur-architect) ; - the diplomas awarded by the National Schools of Architecture in Copenhagen and Arhus (arkitekt); - the certificate of registration issued by the Board of Architects pursuant to Law No. 202 of May 28, 1975 (registreret arkitekt); with Article 13 of this Directive; () j-— ct Gc fp Ny mM i ia bt Fh cu t by m —~ 4 } ) ct ay i J J 4 ) Germany Greece : - the diplomas awarded by the 'Ecole spéciale d'architecture! (architecte DESA); - the diplomas awarded since 1955 by the department of architecture of the 'Ecole nationale supérieure des Arts et Industries de Strasbourg! (formerly the 'Ecole nationale d'ingénieurs de Strasbourg! (architecte ENSATIS) ; - the diplomas awarded by higher institutes of fine arts (Dipl.- Ing., Architekt (Hfbk)); - the diplomas awarded by the departments of architecture (Architektur/Hochbau) of "Technische Hochschulen', of technical universities, of universities and, in so far as these institutions have been merged into "Gesamthochschulen', of ‘Gesamthochschulen! (Dipl.-Ing, and any other title which may be laid down later for holders of these diplomas); - the diplomas (Prufungszeugnisse) awarded before January 1, 1973 by the departments of architecture of 'Ingenieuschulen! and of "Werkkunstschulen', accompanied by a certificate from the competent authorities to the effect that the person concerneg has passed a test of his formal qualifications in accordance with Article 13; of this Directive; POLYTECHNION of Athens, together with a certificate issued by - the engineering/architecture diplomas awarded by the METSOVION + anv} AaéMein Jrweahisn ney, aA: Varast arrayed nQ ue 43 ~ ~ne ENGINSering, arecnicecture divlomas aWaAraeQqa oy cwne Ireland - the degree of Bachelor of Architecture awarded by the National University of Ireland (B Arch. (NUI)) to architecture graduates - the engineering/civil engineering diplomas awarded by the METSOVION POLYTECHNION of Athens, together with a certificate issued by Greece's Technical Chamber conferring the right to pursue activities in the field of architecture; ~ the engineering/civil engineering diplomas awarded by the ARISTOTELION PANEPISTIMION of Thessaloniki, together with a certificate issued by Greece's Technical Chamber conferring the right to pursue acttivities in the field of architecture; - the engineering/civil engineering diplomas awardeg by the PANEPISTIMION THRAKIS, together with a certificate issued by Greece's Technical Chamber conferring the right to pursue activities in the field of architecture; - the engineering/civil engineering diplomas awarded by the PANEPISTIMION PATRON, together with a certificate issued by Greece's Technical Chamber conferring the right to pursue activities in the field of architecture; of of University College, Dublin; ~ the diploma of degree standard in architecture awarded by the College of Technology, Bolton Street, Dublin (Dipl. Arch.); - the Certificate of Associateship of the Royal Institute of Architects of Ireland (ARIAT); - the Certificate of Membership of the Royal Institute of oe KQ + ph. us Q) (eg tn O £ Ireland (MRIAT) ; Italy Netherlands (bouwkundig ingenieur); - the diplomas awarded until 1971 by the former architectural colleges (Hoger Bouwkunstonderricht) (architect HBO); - the diplomas awarded until 1970 by the former architectural colleges (Voortgezet Bouwkunstonderricht) (architect VBO); - ‘laurea in architettura! diplomas awarded by universities, polytechnic institutes and the higher institutes of architecture of Venice and Reggio Calabria, accompanies by the diploma entitling the holder to pursue independently the profession of architect, awarded by the Minister for Education after the candidate has passed, before a competent board, the State examination entitling him to pursue independently the profession of architect (dott. Architetto); - '‘laurea in ingegneria' diplomas in building construction ('sezione constenzione civile') awarded by universitiaensd polytechnic institutes, accompanied by the diploma entitling the holder to pursue independently a profession in the field of architecture, awarded by the Minister for Education after the candidate has passed, before a competent board, the State examination entitling him to pursue the profession independently (dott. Ing. Architetto or dott. Ing. in ingegneria civile); - the certificate stating that its holder has passed the degree examination in architecture awarded by the departments of architecture of the technical colleges of Delft or Eindhoven activities (architect); a a> fu ~ 10] - the diploma of the 'Stichting Insituut voor Architectuur' (Institute of Architectuur'! Foundation) (IVA) awarded on completion of a course organised by this foundation and extending over a minimum period of four years (architect), accompanied by a certificate from the competent authorities to the effect that the person concerned has passed a test of his formal qualifications in accordance with Article 13 of the Directive; - a certificate issued by the competent authorities to the effect that, before the date of entry into force of this Directive, the person concerned passed the degree examination of 'Kandidaat in de bouwkunde! organised by the technical colleges of Delft or Eindhoven and that, over a period of at least five years immediately prior to that date, he pursued architectural activities the nature and importance of which, in accordance with Netherlands requirements, guarantee that he is competent to pursue those activities (architect); - a certificate issued by the competent authorities only to ersons who have reached the age of 40 years before the date of entry into force of this Directive, certifying that, over a period of at least five years immediately prior to that date, the person concerned has pursued architectural activities the nature and importance of which, in accordance with Netherl ds requirements, guarantee that he is competent to pursue tho [the certificates referred to in the seventh and eighth indents need no longer be recognised as from the date of entry into force of laws and regulations in the Netherlands governing the taking up and pursuit of architectural activities under the professional title of architect, in so far as under such provisions those certificates do not authorise the taking up of such activities under that professional title?; Portugal ‘of Porto.! Science or by the universities, 17 - the Diploma "diploma do curso de arquitectura" awarded by the Higher Schools of Fine Arts of Lisbon and Porto, - the Diploma "diploma de licenciatura em arquitectura" awarded by the Higher School of Fine Arts of Lisbon, - the Diploma "carta de curso de licenciatura em arquitectura" awarded by the Technical University of Lisbon and the University - the university diploma in civil engineering awarded by the Higher Technical Institute of the Technical University of Lisbon (Licenciatura em engenharia cil), - the university diploma in civil engineering awarded by the Faculty of Engineering (Engenharia) of the University of Oporto (Licenciature em engenharia civil), - the university diploma in civil engineering awarded by the Faculty of Science and Technology of the University of Coimbra - the Diploma "diploma de curso especial de arquitectura" awarded by the Schools of Fine Arts of Lisbon and of Porto, - the Architects Diploma "diploma de arquitecto" awarded by the Schools of Fine Arts of Lisbon and of Porto. (Licenciatura em engenharia civil), - the university diploma in civil engineering (production) awarded by the University of Minho (Licenciatura em engenharia civl (producdo))', Spain - the official formal qualification of an architect (titulo oficial de arquitecto) awarded by the Minister of Education and Germany be laid down later for holders of these diplomas)." PART II - the diplomas awarded by the departments of architecture (Architektur/Hochbau) of 'Fachhochschulen' and, in so far as these institutions have been merged into "Gesamthochschulen', by the departments of architecture (Architektur/Hochbau) of 'Gesamthochschulen', accompanied, where the period of study is less than four years but at least three years, by a certificate attesting to a four-year period of professional experience in the Federal Republic of Germany issued by the professional body in accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Directive (Ingenieur grad. and any other title which may Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Gov.t Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived JA Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 5.12.86