16 10 310 https://nam.maydayrooms.org/files/original/dab62d4e1b9d1753d133befa3acfdafa.pdf 826de4510fd2f5a2a3b3798418a0ba6c Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Trade Unions and Architecture Description An account of the resource Themes included action on asbestos and Health &amp; Safety, and involvement with Direct Labour Organisations and Building Unions. Following comparative research of possible options, NAM encouraged unionisation of building design staffs within the private sector, negotiating the establishment of a dedicated section within TASS. Though recruitment was modest the campaign identified many of the issues around terms of employment and industrial relations that underpin the processes of architectural production. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource JLO Unionisation Conference Poster Subject The topic of the resource Poster for conference organized by the Junior Liaison Organization (a grouping of younger representatives of each of the building professions) Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource JLO Committee Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived John Murray Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2/11/77 https://nam.maydayrooms.org/files/original/c8f85d8be9d3340b2fac07d85f298e4f.pdf 2fcee7fff2866ed4c724fd285177fecb Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Miscellaneous Subject The topic of the resource Miscellaneous issues Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Various Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1976-1980 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource New Architecture Movement - How it all began Subject The topic of the resource A personal description by John Murray Description An account of the resource NEW ARCHITECTURE MOVEMENT HOW IT ALL BEGAN - A PERSONAL DESCRIPTION User involvement in Design As the project architect of the new Edgewick Primary School in Coventry, I was briefed by the City Education Client Officer, a helpful, experienced and committed client. But when I asked him how I should accommodate useful suggestions from the new Head Teacher about the design of her new school he said, “Just ignore her”. I decided instead to ignore him and went on to work closely with the Head teacher, staff and pupils in developing the design of a successful and well-regarded Primary School adjacent to the existing Victorian Primary School, situated near a large Courtaulds factory and not far from the centre of Coventry. For me this was proof that the users of a building must be fully involved if the design is to be successful. It was a very important lesson and my respect for the committed Head has stayed with me ever since. Now of course, consultation and participation are an integral part of the design process. But in 1968 they were not. (I discovered that in 2014 because of a shortfall in school places, Coventry City Council decided to double the number of pupils so both schools were demolished and replaced by a large PFI school) Working for Tenants and Residents In the early 1970s many architects while working in offices were also providing free design advice and alternative schemes to tenants and residents groups faced with unacceptable redevelopment proposals. This work was in stark contrast to how they were earning their living during the day, but it taught both sides the benefits of having a design service available to and accountable to the people who used buildings. I was working for tenants in Newham while during the day I worked for BDP. BDP incidentally was a very good firm whose idealistic founding partner Grenfell-Baines stated it should be multi- disciplinary and fully involve and reward its staff. (3Rs, Responsibility, Recognition and Reward) (These ideas subsequently influenced the NAM Public Design Group’s proposals). At that time, my wife Ursula was working in a Community Development Project in Canning Town. Through her I became involved with West Ham tenants. Most private firms were not so good as BDP for salaried staff, hence salaried architects desire for change. The RIBA was seen to be a mouthpiece for private Architectural Practice. These ideas became more widespread throughout the profession both amongst salaried architects and teachers in schools of architecture. At the same time, new young Labour councillors, who had emerged from tenants’ struggles, were beginning to be elected and this encouraged the development of NAM ideas in councils, for example Haringey. Architects Revolutionary Council (ARC) While working in BDP, we used to occasionally visit the AA in nearby Bedford Square at lunchtimes. There was also an AA Studio in Percy Street near the BDP office. There I met the tutor, Brian Anson and his students. Brian had established with his students the Architects Revolutionary Council (ARC). They talked to us about ARC’s proposal for a New Architecture Movement to develop ARC’s ideas and especially to take on the RIBA, ARC’s bête noir. They were trying to encourage sympathetic architects, teachers and students to attend an inaugural conference to establish the New Architecture Movement. After I talked to Brian about my interest in public design he asked me to make a presentation about a national design service at the proposed conference. In November 1975 an advert appeared in the architectural press inviting participants to attend the inaugural congress of a hitherto unheard of New Architecture Movement in the unlikely setting of Harrogate. The congress, organised by ARC after discussion with sympathetic architects, brought together a considerable number of like-minded salaried architects and students. NAM was born 1 The New Architecture Movement Harrogate is a very attractive and stylish former spa town in Yorkshire. No doubt ARC chose it for that reason. I presented a paper on a National Design Service to the Congress. Apart from meeting many like- minded architects, the main thing I remember about the congress is the debate about the proposed structure for the New Architecture Movement. NAM Structure ARC proposed that an elected Leader and committee should govern NAM. This resulted in an animated debate. The women at the meeting persuaded the men that the New Architecture Movement should be structured like the women’s movement; ie, groups of people interested in particular issues who would come together as necessary, not at the diktat of a higher body. In retrospect I think this was NAM’s great strength so we didn’t spend our time nit-picking as would inevitably have been the case if we had agreed to the centrally controlled body that ARC wanted. It was eventually agreed that NAM should be structured as local groups. There was also to be a liaison group, whose role was to coordinate the different campaign groups, deal with correspondence and arrange the next annual congress. Groups would report to each other through a magazine called SLATE. Liaison Group I was involved in the first London liaison group and in due course we got a grant from the Rowntree Foundation, which enabled us to set up an office in 9 Poland Street. During the first few months after Harrogate, we discussed how NAM should develop. We drafted NAM’s objectives (attached) and organised our first meeting in May 1977 in Covent Garden to encourage more salaried architects to join. Anne Karpf reported the event very favourably in Building Design. Groups The following campaign groups developed over time: • Alternative Practice • Education • Feminist Group • Professional Issues (A number of us were elected to ARCUK to represent ‘unattached’ architects) • Public Design Group • SLATE • Trade Unions and Architecture These groups, which were largely autonomous, worked across local groups to develop their ideas. They arranged their own conferences and reported through SLATE and annually to the NAM Congress. Although I was involved in the liaison group and other groups, my main interest was in developing the ideas for a National Design Service. This eventually became the Public Design Group. It included one of Brian Anson’s AA students and architects and students from Sheffield and Nottingham. So we did a lot of travelling, usually meeting in Sheffield. See separate report on how the Public Design Group evolved and how its ideas were eventually developed in Haringey. NAM’s ideas became more widespread throughout the profession both amongst salaried architects and teachers in schools of architecture. John Murray NAM Founder Member 31 August 2015 2 Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource JM Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived JM Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2015 https://nam.maydayrooms.org/files/original/8a4bdf73a4f4fc8aa8a65cc1aa6bc3ea.pdf 78c37d8392db6790d890f5a2c23eb975 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Professional Issues Description An account of the resource A cohort of NAM members became engaged with the professional registration body, standing as elected councillors on the Architects Registration Council and its various committees. Hitherto entirely dominated by the RIBA bloc, the Council began to yield to a new dynamic through NAM's involvement, enabling fresh perspectives on such issues as mandatory fee scales, greater lay representation on the body, ethically-based standards of professional conduct, etc. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Notes on Technical Competence Description An account of the resource ACTION Lee Ne eoaeArcsinARSCON Ca ee Er aa 2“ A We q7rG oh UWA DAG AD AK PED jKd, DANafnG9.T8 @VaR. Dey Aide G asw oy P.f,C. Gructa, ¢ K INGOT UENO | /1-O0An(a) F,WGN I> Meelys _ AicDd, OCM7O0KER //7H ©. a Nk, a. ~ortiu AGCunrA (a ave lng . (7-94-78) EeRR hrRAR KALK REGhte, i Sf on Yes U.K. EOr-28 CoG, 2) Hy ARCLK ¢ Or Rey oto — i Gf (CGronw, COGnn a) 3) BA Ainncber :; NZ AM. Gpash fo MOLE Gte Go Vascina, fo Pr2rsek Sar cs ereeat’ & Kscof Tm,|aOtte,AkAneBuGA 7b.allCuteQu Avthonta, . \ZM, Afro @ 7x ergQannodesCOfeACGOUNOENDjmWreralCAQLgoZ [oa ae ne sz i oz AY Aterd. .A- AxperCaahHoax NAM Boke GS45 GS mam 9 R@SsI Se) CZSs) OR KAX Carte (Qs Gumanrctset) WO, jews Wh Arcot \o pix a a*& ComdevQouce eee VL Gprea ‘ Q04q GaawOnVobLReee to rial 24 Qn RA wRADE ADVERIN NO, A.b, Q npdevt Q@ aceabeSEES: of Copa Qwe c& ALCOL oN Avo ae s . Yes, 4 & @ Arete fm Prapaauns O.Arwtm ou —~ BPE (ey) Aut — BM please 72 oO ss. Horta xkecAw a tl BES CONE PripOsohd oO Plewas& SCiuekGACo jSf~HLCervoProms yd NQunrckKaeMure who)on AA.,oee(Ochs Grediver. yPervibl,wicholeCOANg KARE os oper. ux£ Ans. Jt) (Griloce he Arcdstectvee ol 4Q, te Ru IGA GARG) eas tomers LQ RA, or QAlRrQhin wCrrns OL sr. ot OF eee Onc Certy 7 af ARUK Ry.Tee &ProuseG.CesUae Se Arel2 Ge TQ Quan Korvnolonn g Ce AQm, 2 SAMaits AOC. Gn, olsCut peeswsol VAgrn/l Olas €s inns JforrrsOrektok & Ort 8, fa tacks- Le,(ee CO. AhsTARToene aeeaae EeBR he “telrolaal vOcdurt YF :|Porton peansiess o alerr.Durch Prof. rani, TH, fo One Aer KonR G Whiner Quo BRa2KUnkeSAYpiso€GockCoenon,UL4A7E Tel W&& sast hy 16. Refeorng (Accent — “4- & sok & iu, Q4wWe ; aay V4A7E Gnortr AR LK Corer! oe 7M. f NAIAK & RARER obew Oskar AU Geir Pree An OFRusf Cowie A423.b:5 Qruk Alef. AR pose Padtn OA a Bus 3toteat Coven Mbeya OCs tok re > UAH Q. AS CrwvGaork Geek. He Abe ASA ale Que eS P&snsq wo AObkeh Vora ackass 2/64 : 6King AGlx & Cri A& Gre 2) Care, Q LCom, 7) & Ryne LO asw ALK OH Hy GGA o~ : getNUnn Omer Wo 10]Pg Mrs Oy&Gintoneohntefo,oyAPr bk k a7) ECA CASULA SD) lo. Tai oe Caw Got thy Crrnte AtnolOnen ~ REET GOGCOS NEA Cepy AH Wrovenie PainGneie (AGS BapOrewkl lO. \A& ADVERIAS 30 | 4 M-'— br em PPC, er AGenwea Gola Cn Aeneas ONC ee Peleg AwunYtaeSe rte.NOs. Kae the Anoudtis. ? Lecel 4uAws, | LQu8 Occ”RatAS.proxiesla&pee boRiBAOrchKarbsae fo,Kotter COGS NU Grae raGtlee =BMD Ue NOs Agar . >i —IL LNYAINEAD!, FM. GGinro eters, Qee BxGf, horns, ooUbon Ante Kure be (ChOntQu Pox CSA. )LQ oA © bits WEI hr SAE fe HsYok SSemOURS @ourm, Kasele byl Coct<Qdc Ay oH ARC umn dG Aust Lon clang Pegi 7s “Cha! ov Dow, dig POACIC. GusGs ae CP. QAcG OQ yp han, Korshk LUorn, CAGsnLOWS Oca.” La SiG /6oxo an Qoasvas Eo) CSFa OSOo CoC CREO Re AN SPamvele (Ake broke) Bea Giro tpeol AL GP - Wr%2 OK. T Akar Zoo ,Aowikinr Zyl, 4h,Vue Jude & ALEDR 20.4FAL.Achar, [Wxsalanhole|sBD Ae Qemobs.Gu etohn. AbebriGh nbrolneher, ry ainlahive GA. cepe agen cemane Gone G2 Also AQ A Contry A.M. (3. Para & Exe Anernee). J vet7e§ Senet. Io Kodi kon A On Ph. 7 /@ / a Fed. Vili FinsS RomARNE. J SA. Sy. | z./n ‘Ab. Creweee Ca ACs Enka C.J/NEV USeeue econ O ses GAS So) ‘oce&PQ ae ho-ceUntkaclsA ey ANrepmtreutea ¢aAPate oy)—4urk ne 5 b3IDAK slprtel GR 2olac, 2 en Gra : Gs 4o a Caen [Ar por Jog PholrGsr. Kn &, fe CLO Cundhi cp 7© ex eee &, Qr& @ Axe 6A ;noe & J :AL} oa Le ae f~ Ki sao KyiA DOppO21 ZFe,+ Adz PQ.AR aT 2 LQunn AGok 2tpuring pee Ki, | tc/Au Amase ie. NA. Aeesdlove| tux fe . TA. Csyfrrid Acgicbalck wmt Qu Phy am OOnttactsdA Archtach fe Ay.A. MW, AQ Seok AL. |e dare tes Hib 10, Ayp0O0th wAQnl, redoly s Z Ko Gsieae ibe ar iS. Arkek Hoiol Geetk | Reh See @ be Verde fr (& Ase&Se CmGar2ckae foreworekosQ.banrGeesPCOS.ProofinoV0CatemQue Adc & ae Mek ofc a fo. NoQwAar ARan OC), Cott / (iAyD S AD GenieSoe Cae Enka /.oe USFinsO RnRBeAS ATaSe (3. frea 3 ExAnme). yUMP7S Senet. a 3¢./ YrerturgBoOvelnsambSafernice64E~ Woe eee eS fevkr.Ad ‘ogo& QSL Wwe 6A- Ova ey Untiaclsr 6 Mplatith a5 AEP ERY —hak ine|astaueshortedGeMleuoOnOntos“G4Lea enta Corl Arefar erg Pho(2bs. ku, fr Coane 1# AL enw SeCe fe Pasze Uf ? Jew AC.&,Are@AseeBAE wnhok=> Asac&HEARS « (o ~ AloQmArs Aarne gatoree KyMae7intsces (KIA DLPO2A WAGEACG LQunnAGolk20gusringOWPEs HG, refau Ama Hae fe . , [EES TING ATLNG Lhtesd lovk . wae Os Ant AAU Ao‘al pmAbe Qu. ESS Qu On. Ottachsd ArchiGch fr NAM. HAOncolSook 1 Kare ts HibK 10, Ay0rmth OOK r2Goly [im wpetyel I bee A Gstux Suk, (IS. ARerK LOA Geok | Ruisonac Seat oa Ase &pre Cu loreck) Hand} Gook . eee aM. fore work osQa ban Gees PCOSG . Presprtve VvFa femur (S (i NCAR CRON Ce loz rate Pratt cle Aye bhn See {Sm. (RING EO ees &S bom ut) Dorcluclack Nbawtol 42 su freporas p-RepsVolechimrt.2c.See ; Detx. rae Ol, SaO) fe Reps eae oe g yeas (e Rapwe ee ordJ)eg asas 2.5 heCeol se ve Zre ith. G@iGQuecunlascsPhar rouMestoeeratoALAN Groups — & Weltrrelt, WO VE , Bp: wiere Clickee (olaesoeNOR euAG oe Ae eoes asw “2GA—E(StnOlu Oe Bae LH Ovo, Gus Ser lQ ter UP AR CLL AinQuer 7M, portal Paden, Qs (Pron |a . ) AypWawrcla As 9 Ober Rr bo. br. hog Cus i) Ae Or Pu GP (Shi Heese Peel (yateary Ptopgerbak bAESClon we wu Aa, Ee Oe aco Qi bO ju) Aneto. ple r at wx, Kat Re clef 98 hic ile GG fe. & Cbroppedk grow AD. AL. | « /CR bo QU u) BAE ‘ (EB Napa Coe Urol Wl. ole,ene strOnn a aus (/ Or —fren (GER . heeee (fev 2 “LOQune Gioia own Aw(00Ge Orla an paneQg ay l= ei ay ce> Nahls wbFuck GB4&sQreOpsCuK e Gon Liv & prin (!) | &( my) Ad Susrgeutael e < OnSOl:Eg CworOeCeOrgLrg ee Wl pyasa EWG), OLE Un Ky, nee EyProclucg Regime A075. Llpbn,POCA vic) TM opined t&QUe a Tee Gee pees GPA a a on : ; VPAxorJQAe+“4Ste&Je hyLt—G hp Ghre chal P N ac RiAr PSHE LOunk, WAGES yap vii Wea lodewOweGOK a ye Ryprs pt Cambes Bolircokhsi bX hee MO Queca east 4 Russ Te bon ne Lol, i505 06)ech Arpdr chotrerncnOt a Ge, "l, Cit) AL IGO a Rae ks.[o,eo (hn Ft /1,Abas) —Asxolecl . Botere Yor Cre. fron M05—95 Pee1960 — e te, of[e6r bs0, 7g done Ocdsi (4x54)xamrfespt-b CoriicGeeh tee tAEece AL,FBpO-2ttyterrympforteCS,g AD, onl Pop site L4 oes \ZAY, co. RemanBe —Sau yoy trcfisus ofl YA Acker JM. otc. Aktu< Bo 4 -/ Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource JM Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived John Murray Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource October 1978 https://nam.maydayrooms.org/files/original/d6aa81f51c8f6bfe73d15c29d6553166.pdf f4c92e84142809e5c2d55881ed77b90d Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Professional Issues Description An account of the resource A cohort of NAM members became engaged with the professional registration body, standing as elected councillors on the Architects Registration Council and its various committees. Hitherto entirely dominated by the RIBA bloc, the Council began to yield to a new dynamic through NAM's involvement, enabling fresh perspectives on such issues as mandatory fee scales, greater lay representation on the body, ethically-based standards of professional conduct, etc. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Correspondence, etc re …Unattached Representation; also notes on meeting with OFT on Monopolies Report Description An account of the resource To Un attacteool Peps . Deav J tndine a eoty of bly sot f Fadiv te MeCUK CGwumllies ¢ There ee be a mol Thee ygay)ara lat Your | L ( Unattached Mepiecetitnes at lardan /|eeu /4-Mare, “ACU , 73 ttallan, Sheot mele Gai TheCailepsathcouldawlPeantink ak CnC aangp ‘ fue Ssa ical ae e bySCAG To UnattachedPepe- 5 Uilbr Anewt Z1 feb 7% Deav The Cucldf eps ash coulda we Pe ieed an DY qa a change, feay (ee ort Ez h slATE a cise % Jo enclme a copy of elles sont fe Farciv te ACU Cums, € gee oll hoa oad Ths yganard last Unattached ey)at oeWS(oe lApe SeanaeeMine“ateAiea. Kennett\.) FevelovC4/ hegjohan/ Arecvild 73 balla Sheet lrdo~ Wl. “4A. 5 hulfor Aven lnotix WG a O ie Deny Mul Frvett|y Ro: Atecuk Grwwillus 1970-FO. ‘Gpoillemers Agreemont? JFtansconstleMlpuceietadliiénofteUnabtchedt people dinky te Gentlernans Aypeomendt tour 4 Achiecine, opts OSniatlee Etucahiar >Cee Alar upman , SC Susan dackon Eatisrod Walbey, branes and GoutrekPeopeses Qrumileo? (Marian fetrots lan Tod. ProfessianakMgaeComvullee > (delbnMan a| Bch ise ShowtAtho&bafeSpee mae] KounalhOFaceyExy/HA 5MilbrAwe Ay2cUK werefallanr Stet lado wi. Dory KV Foveboy, Pe! ¥RCUK Commitims 1979-¥o. Candidaltz, de Fro Eloctian| oe SSfe to beard d Archulicluyal Eetucakinr, lan Coopey 4 Flot 1072) Vanes Las David Robson Bio Aawatcsne Oneega Robert Malte Thavas Leallor, SO ern cow \lelin Alay Thauas LJrolloy Puspeaeo Quwilla Bur Tec lan Tod Peta)Cupmere lan Ted lanTsd [arnTod lantel lan Tee 40 Professianack[LespereoQuamillae Reboort Malte eae eefee Grdproud Candidcles fv Fee Ehootinn (cort.) é 5:0 Diciblinn Conmultia Michagk Broad €| forsco, \ln Hane Gp attached tubuseniedines) Wounalad \ohn Adan Seco dod Yelm are ; Pra ee ee a ee Oo" Nee Ye Wine SMl Ave, NC 19.29 7.2 Ls Rpt preparabylastuserUnattocladKops, Ue Offore ee ge eotal the Mtn ile Sf Sas SdRoeland ao‘tadNecewedGur + Theewuttole onTres lo oe ap tears a ees aul be Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource JM Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived John Murray Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource Feb 1979 Subject The topic of the resource Correspondence, etc re …Unattached Representation; also notes on meeting with OFT on Monopolies Report https://nam.maydayrooms.org/files/original/eac17e4ca20e1816cb43043eb550cc1c.pdf a27e3fda5dc604f90ca31bdc1a149b36 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Professional Issues Description An account of the resource A cohort of NAM members became engaged with the professional registration body, standing as elected councillors on the Architects Registration Council and its various committees. Hitherto entirely dominated by the RIBA bloc, the Council began to yield to a new dynamic through NAM's involvement, enabling fresh perspectives on such issues as mandatory fee scales, greater lay representation on the body, ethically-based standards of professional conduct, etc. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Letter to Guardian re operation of ARCUK Description An account of the resource =z /4.2 Gare (aan //7 Farriagdér Loal Lendon ECIL BER By Lareoce Road % London (V9. g AngursT TRC. — .Ree Jo The Guardar ame Wiis Ie Ans arfhicle ax ery archilecTs place po ree preHe Crrinrert cal, a Step herr Games writes of yafegvar/s unposed SevregqislereeeVigeCEC Kayafithefle7]BunArch Achatiets.” Saree (73/ whew Farbeewen© 2 perses oa Ayclitets Posiatratee ee Gees (CEG (eel, Wahea,fEAS(Oe: iesprefeesSr een ‘aeenvftae iv ShatYtarArcch.fectsRegistrationWietotFLYe Kensefoon, {PLAGEY by ARCUAkK fas feen 4 4 Polen “LoCease Sa fegeeel Ea eealee ;kegstrFinn astheARG? ait ieeebershue of 4h. eIBA IS A recon séef Lea architect(Justasbewonorlaclcepdtpsnbershep of thea RAC, whatever 7s presemect men , GS G plshb & ye elyivagCE eae Ba C/A ee e ;subshadVe gees oeEe Ayitp numberof UR, antilects a1e cheosirg rot fo be rembces g te Kea tileon Thaes, Fhereare coh registered Mier esol Sf RIEA rere as artilects wrthARCHUK. Arhanes PMOL teatpresenT Yirbiell. LEE puppet itr ‘Gouncul packed «th 2) ped,CaAfellowTheR/LA“Loe, Cvternthat hag Us eos EEaBote peWe.xr Pafh eeeClaiioeLe ArchTeefeJoxrns/:AO of een RIGA meusbecs Prevsht Bal carbo! ARO by he.VeBAN Corea) se an Ye ream of interes tS of Ta pub le. /fore over , By. Though t aa gra lfrca ho aaa itself “ (jibe hue io Ay, fre Bro Wr Da vi Heyheu/ Roberz Me VieeTM Toho Nv (aSects) Was Peavs CVveiw a Phe best te,(OresTs of Ska Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource JM et. al Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived John Murray Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource August 1980 Subject The topic of the resource Letter to Guardian re operation of ARCUK https://nam.maydayrooms.org/files/original/01342c65bc4fdfd57d04236b52fa682f.pdf 1a29d2cf2baaef18e8e8ba1ca14f765c Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Introduction and Origins Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Letter to John Allan confirming part repayment of loaned funds Subject The topic of the resource Letter to John Allan confirming part repayment of loaned funds Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource John Allan Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived John Allan https://nam.maydayrooms.org/files/original/b8c38f1588ff20ff43d5dc9a68cbdaee.pdf d8c2b750b11d70a9c5c1227dd3ee6c49 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Miscellaneous Subject The topic of the resource Miscellaneous issues Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Various Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1976-1980 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource NAM Subject The topic of the resource 4 page historical intro to NAM Description An account of the resource INL99dSH3d “TWOIYOLSIH < a HISTORICAL PERSPEC?IVE Hawser Trunnion the selected history of modern architecture from which NAN draws its conclusions for action can be told as a ghost story. That is to say, it is the tale of how a once lively modernism lost its social radicalism, became comfortable then senile, and finally died — but only to transform itself into a ghost which continues to haunt us the more effectively for this deceptive transformation. Like most good stories, there are several versions with significant differences that shed more light on the narrators than on the story itself. The most recent official version was told by ‘he Architectural Review, that ageing glossy now totally debauched by its own rhetoric, in its Preview Issue of January 1976. The punch-line came first : "that Modern Architecture as one has been experiencing it has gone into hiding. Gone (well, nearly gone) are those massive rectilinear packages; the towers, the slabs and (since Burolandschaft) the too big urban footstools. Gone (or nearly gone) are those self-assertive, diagramatic buildings which made a point of having nothing to do with the neighbours. Gone is the Will to assert, the will to shock." That the wills to assert or shock have gone is debatable. That the buildings referred to have "gone" should presumably be taken to mean the new commissions for such buildings, not the buildings themselves. But the most disagreeable aspect of the article is the mixture of wise complac— ency and indulgent penitence. Unfortunately we find our version of the story rather more worrying. It has indeed taken almost exactly twenty-five years for the impetus behind the first Modern Movement in this country to be exhausted. The Festival of Britain and European Architectural Heritage Year, 1951 to 1975, might be taken as the official milestones at the inauguration and closure of the period respectively. We appear to stand now at the beginning of a new phase in which the criteria of 'relevant' action will be determined as much by the understanding of this legacy as by our particular political standpoint. he effects of the process of radicalization induced by war could be seen in "The past is not for living in; it is a well of conclusions from which we draw in order to act. " (John Berger) ae 1945 in the arrival of the first modern Socialist Government, with its far-reaching social reforms on the domestic scale, and in our modified nation status in INAVO and the realization that we were no longer an imperial power. In matters of environment the New Towns Movement, the Town & Country Planning Act 1947 etc were the first expression of a new vision and confidence that had already permeated other sectors of society, including for example the health services. One recalls the bright-eyed article by the Smithsons in which they referred to themselves as "The 1947 Generation" denouncing the bygone equipment of the pre-modern architect, the screw pen, the classical grammar, in favour of their own new weapons, the development plan and the C.P.0. The South Bank Exhibition and the associated housing schemes for Lansbury, East London epitomised the mixture of exhuberance and ‘committed concern' while showing that modern architecture was not simply a flat roof or a commer window but a comprehensive urban language. The underlaying ideas, had of course been worked out long before, in Germany, France, Holland, Sweden and most completely in Russia. In this country, typically slow on the uptake,it was codified visually in the 1938 Exhibition of MARS group, which itself derived its premises from the parent CIAM movement in Europe. The spirit in which modem architecture was first embraced by a radical few in this country is best captured by Max Fry's own description of himself, as a young man of 30. architecture decisively. Then the second thing was added to me when I fell in love with a house by Miss van der Rohe, his Turgendhat Haus, in the Taunus Mountains. I fell in love with this building, which is to say that I gave my heart to it and it entered into my emotional recesses and filled them to overflowing. "When I first came in contact with new architecture in Germany I was struck by two things; the first, this version of a grandly proportioned urbanism taking in everything: dwellings, roads, factories, markets, down to the small paraphernalia at the closest personal context. Here is an architecture, I said to myself, capable of everything. Here is a true resolution, the end of discord. This is it, I wasayept with a fervour that was the reflection of a release of creative energy which was to spread from Europe to every part of the world and change the character of For me at that time it was as though, my mind cleared, rinsed and invigorated by the noble rationality of the Bauhaus, the breadth and grandeur of the proposition that it and the Modem Movement represented to me, suddenly my heart was taken, by one work, not essentially different, but of a quality of which I had not imagined the movement as yet capable.” traveller put the vision more bluntly. The sincerity is exemplary; the combination of rationality and passion the best modern architecture can offer but it now seems incomplete. Wells Coates, Fry's contemporary and fellow "As creative architects, we are concerned with a future which must be planned, rather than a past which mst be patched up". from the thirties But the climate of 1945 was different{both in degree and in kind. The post-war era for the first time saw the alliance of the ‘new wisdom' hitherto the preoccupation of dissaffected intellectuals and enlightened bourgeous patrons, with all the executive force of government and the major institutions. At the very moment that the pioneers' thesis appeared to be vindicated, so the process of institu%tionalizing its assumptions began in its adoption by a new establishment due to become infinitely more sophisticated and bureaucratic than any hitherto. Naturally it was intelligent enough to absorb the precepts and personalities that would otherwise have been dynamite, and throughout the 50's the professions of architecture and planning were happy to be included in the monolithic drive for reconstruction. (For 20 years it has been considered an unjustified luxury to conceive of L.A. housing as anything but a numbers problen.) The antithesis,which was bound to arise in conflict with this centralist orthodoxy, appeared early in the 1960's in phenomena ranging from the satire movement, to student protest; that is at about the time when on the threefold premise of cheap energy, expansionist economics and enlightened paternalism, "progressive! architects and planners (now comfortably established in government institutions and well-connected practices) were ready for the big boom. The extent of development, publicly or privately sponsored during the 1960's is unlikely to be equalled during the lifetime of any reader over 20,and the housing, new towns, universities, transport infrastructure etc. -- —6f this period will somehow or other have to do for the majority of us and our children till the latter are middle-aged. The future which Wells Coates generally wanted to plan is now the past that we will have to patch up. But for the architectural profession, the boundaries of their sphere of action were still essentially the same. Even Leslie Martin, one of the most advanced thinkers of the movement, took stock of the situation in the mid 60's like this:- Referring to the 20's, 30's he wrote in 1966 "However complicated the historical situation may have been, three powerful lines of thought appeared. The first came from the passionately held belief that there had to be some complete and systematic re-examination of human needs and that as a result of this, not only the form of buildings, but the total environment would be changed. The second line of thought interlocking with this was simply that change in the form of buildings or environment would only be achieved completely through the full use of modern technology. These 2 ideas produced a third, which wasthat each architectural problem should be constantly re-assessed and thought out afresh". Martin went on to diagnose the failure of modern architecture in the neglect by architects to attend to the 3rd item. But he himself was neglecting another factor infinitely more important, because while concentrating on changes in form and technique he quite ignored the question of changes in patronage - the underlaying governing function which determines the very boundaries of change of the other two. It's the same blind spot as Fry and Coates, but after 30 years of social change - how much less forgiveable! Max Beerbohm had called the 20th Century the "century of the common man", but in architecture and planning, after now more than 50years of modernism, he is still assumed to be less qualified than remote architects and planners to know whats best for hin. Meanwhile arteries were hardening. In 1970 the D.O.E. -a concept that would have seemed revolutionary 25 years earlier - established itself in the now familiar faulty towers, sited tastefully separate from Whitehall, and expressing so precisely its bland combination of technocracy and officialdom, to preside over a process that was already in decline. What could follow now? Obvious with hindsight: a simple coronary case with complications. We ran out of fuel —- petro-chemical, financial and most important social. For by now the assumed popular consent on which all this development had been based was solidly organised into community groups, environmentarists, conservation lobbies, spaceship earth economists,etc of increasing expertise. It began to seem once more that the people with the power were less intelligent than the people without it. The complications? Almost as fast as the development boom fever was dying in the establishment the antibodies were being absorbed. Participation, piecemeal planning, rehab and recyling have been hastily substituted in the official policies of national and local authorities and the professional institutions such that the concepts of 'Commmity Architecture’ and ‘Neighbourhood Participation’ are already barnacled with bogus concern and trendy humbug, without mich noticeable advantage to the intended beneficiaries. The courtesy with which Nicholas Harbraken was received at a County Hall lecture, when his whole theme was disposing of the very basis on which the Department operated, was quite astonishing. Thus the wise Authority rejects not with brick wall but with cotton wool. Sociologists call it "Rejection by partial incorporation", and the British Establishment is uniquely gifted at it. Not only is there nothing you can complain about - there's plenty you must be grateful for. Yhus the ;host was born The current climate is pluralistic and diverse to the extent that, given the right form of words, everyone can apparently claim to be progressive - the D.0.E, R.I.B.A, most L.A.'s, the R.T.P.I. etc etc - concealing the fact that major ideological change is occurring with little or no commensurate redistribution of power. Environmental matters continue to be determined on the basis of power, not of need, and the status quo is effectively maintained. It is this situation that N.A.M. was formed to study and to penetrate. So much for what amounts to our context in the outside world. Meanwhile, what of our context in the profession? In the same period under review the profession has transformed itself from a craft-orientated elite of aesthetic gourmets supported by forelock -— tugging draughtsmen, predomminatly private, into an amy of professionals dependent on a very different calibre of recruit - a university educated, mainly middle-class mass of aspiring principals whose habit of identifying with employers has blurred their vision of the political reality both within their offices and within the RIBA as a whole. Salaried architects -— the vast majority of the profession - who may be hopeful of more direct and satisfying relatiaships with the users of their products, in view of the changing climate, have little to be optimistic about. Their governing body, the R.I.B.A. in no way representative of their concerns, continues to be dominated by the assumptions of private principals and no other organisation save ARC and ourselves shows any sign of challenging it. Such a state of affairs, when 80% of a profession is misrepresentated by default (or not at all) would be at best unsatisfactory, except that the current economic depression has begun to show that more immediate aspects of employment may be none too cosy either. Government cuts and the Middle East Klondike can only temporarily disguise the fact that large sections of society who can avail themselves easily of the services of doctors and lawyers have no access to architects except through surrogate clients whose patronage they can in no way initiate. It is out of this ghostly atmosphere of reality and appearances, wisdom and duplicity that N.A.M. developed and it is mainly from this section of the profession that its current membership is drawn. At the deliberately unlikely venue of Harrogate, rather less than a hundred people met for a weekend in November 1975 at the invitation of the small group named ARC (Architect's Revolutionary Council) which had already for a couple of years been preoccupied with such questions. The outcome was the nucleus of a New Architecture Movement which has since distinguished its own identity from that of ARC and at the same time consolidated its membership and its aims. Of the latter more will be said later, but beforehand the two essential characteristics of the movement that Harrogate established require explanation. First its attitude: it was felt that this mst be positive and constructive, no matter whether this involved more work. Nevertheless we must beware of getting bogged down in research. We would guess that it's all on the shelves of College libraries already. What we need are the people who wrote it. The second feature is our structure. If there is a single obvious lesson in the past period it is that the more general the precept the more diverse mist be its application. The structure is therefore federal, national. Our object is to seek strength in numbers such that any individuals or groupings that share the basic aims contribute to the consensus for action. Apart from rudimentary liason processes, therefore the resulting character of the movement is its diversity and its localised basis. A centralised power elite dictating policy seemed both alien and unworkable. The N.A.M. is a microcosm of the social structure it foresees revolutionizing architectural patronage. establish a group of your own. lies in the actions of many. and are putting a more sociable face on them". ie Individuals and local groups spread throughout the country make up the Movement —- all of equal status in so far as they can develop their own programmes in support of the generally agreed aims - any material produced therefore is signed for example "N.A.M., Edinburgh Group", or "N.A.M. North London Group". The essential function of making a sustaining contacts, together with arranging national congresses is carried out by a small Liason Group - which at present happens to be situated in London. This function could of course be transferred to any group who wished to take over it. If you wish to join, the contact list will probably already contain the names of individuals or groups in the area and you can join their meetings or alternatively Ideally a network of groups will develop, covering the entire country, with overseas contacts also, each one working on @ number of topics, local campaigns etc which it would present at national congress for review. The Congress would also of course be the place for overall aims and strategy to be reviewed. The key to this decentralised structure is that of local antonomy. If a particular topic or local issue is your interest then you pursue it. We are not a movement with presidents or celebrities and its strength lies not in the words of a few. Its strength and tweedledee of form and technique - competence and the Anyway we started telling a ghost story, and want now to tell how it ends. Well,for the A.R. it ends about here, because Modern Architecture they tell us has gone into hiding. Actually they were more honest than they intended when they added: "This disappearance is not caused by any great change in the accommodation asked for: clients are still calling for immodest cubes of space and be given this city bursting character. But, by and large architects are displaying them differently Well what a surprise. Plus ca change. Still the old tweedledum lies in the actions of many. and are putting a more sociable face on them". fs Individuals and local groups spread throughout the country make up the Movement - all of equal status in so far as they. can develop their own programmes in support of the generally agreed aims - any material produced therefore is signed for example "N.A.M., Edinburgh Group", or "N.A.M. North London Group". The essential function of making 2 sustaining contacts, together with arranging national congresses is carried out by a small Liason Group - which at present happens to be situated in London. This function could of course be transferred to any group who wished to take over it. If you wish to join, the contact list will probably already contain the names of individuals or groups in the area and you can join their meetings or alternatively establish a group of your own. Ideally a network of groups will develop, covering the entire country, with overseas contacts also, each one working on a number of topics, local campaigns etc which it would present at national congress for review. The Congress would also of course be the place for overall aims and strategy to be reviewed. and tweedledee of form and technique - competence and the The key to this decentralised structure is that of local antonomy. If a particular topic or local issue is your interest then you pursue it. We are not a movement with presidents or celebrities and its strength lies not in the words of a few. Its strength Anyway we started telling a ghost story, and want now to tell how it ends. Well, for the A.R. it ends about here, because Modern Architecture they tell us has gone into hiding. Actually they were more honest than they intended when they added: "This disappearance is not caused by any great change in the accommodation asked for: clients are still calling for immodest cubes of space and be given this city bursting character. But, by and large architects are displaying them differently Well what a surprise. Plus ca change. Still the old tweedledum the whole chain. in the course of our work. design guide. We leave you to guess whether this preservation of the status quo is because the RIBA is too preoccupied with bread and butter issues, or because it knows all too well which The - questionis now not whether the politics of the profession matters or not, but whether anything else does. A profession which once came near the brink of radical change - donned a mask instead and now its face has grown to fit it. side its bread is buttered on. But behind the new sociable face practising its "social art" the architect with integrity (a word mach in the news on which we had something to say to Monopolies Commission) knows quite well that his formal windmill-tilting and technical guesswork hardly touch the real forces and desires of the people or groups that literally form the life blood of the environment. The radical question is not "what forms? or "which techniques" but "who are my patrons? for it is this link which draws up Without seeking to answer it, modern architecture can well stay in hiding, while its ghost roams far and wide; all the more sinister for its new disguise. It visits most of us daily Now NAM must measure its strength; dispose of this ghost of modern architecture, and build a social reality in its place. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource John Allan Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived John Allan Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource Undated https://nam.maydayrooms.org/files/original/a6f2c2dcc82dc0c2fc7e64d1f5d8f39d.pdf a5f5fb8c74a068efcfb377a14e20771b Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Miscellaneous Subject The topic of the resource Miscellaneous issues Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Various Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1976-1980 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource NAM Subject The topic of the resource Historical resume of context for NAM's origins (9 pp typescript) Description An account of the resource 1. BACKGROUR D ° i” Aus? ARCRITACTURS FOVaN a It has taken almost exactly twenty-five years for the impetus behind the first iodern jovement in this country to be exhausted. oe. festival of Britain 1951 and ia | taken as the official milestones at the inauguration and ‘closure ef the period respectively. | | ‘e seem to stand new at she beginning cf a new ‘phase in which ‘the criteria of 'relevant' action will be determined. asmuchbytheunderstandingofeurlegacyasourone political standpoint. The effects of the process xf radicalization induced by war cxuld be seen in the arrival of the first modern Socialist Gsvernment with bia: Gea nbagin ters social referms on the dnmestic scale, and in cur modified nation status in ‘ate and the realization that we were n> longer an imperial power. | | ke In matters oa envirennent the New Toms Hevenent, the Town & a Planning Act 1947 ete. were the first expression of a new vision and csenfidence that had already permeated other sectcrs of svciety, including for example the health services. The South Bank Uxhibitien and the Associated Housing schemes in Lansbury, Mast London epitomised the slicetae of exuberance and ‘committed concerm' while sheving het sigdee, atoll estan was ss x not simply a flat roof ora corner window, but a comprehensive urban language. The underlying ideas, had of course been werked out long befere : it was *cedified visually in the 1939 Exhibition %::2a of the Mars Group, which itself derived its premises ~ from the parent CIAM movement in Europe. But theclimate of 1945 was different both in.degree and in kind. .The post-war an... for the first time saw the alliance of the ‘new wisdom', hithertu preoccupatiun of dissatisfied intellectuals and enlightened bourgeois patrons, withall the executive farce. of government and the major ieeiatlehe At the very iahient that the pioneer's thesis appeartsedbe vindicated, a the process ef institutionalizirg its assumptions began in its adeptien by a new establishment due ta become infinitely more sophisticated and bureaucratic than any hitherte. Naturally it was intelligent enough to absorb | the prece is and, perssnalities that would otherwise have been dynamite, and throughout the '50's the professianosf architecture and planning were happy to be included in the monolithic drive for reconstruction. : he anti-thesis which was bound to crise in conflict with : this centralist orthodoxy sppeared early in the 1960's in phenomens, ranging -from the satire movenent, to student protest, ‘y that is at about the time when enthe threefold premise of cheap energy, expansionist ecenomics and enlightened paternalism, | "progressive"architects and planners (now comfortably established in government: institutioR® and well-connected practices) were ready for the big boom. The extent of development, publicly or privatelys sponsored during thel960's, is unlikely td we equalled during the lifetime ef anyone reaching this - and the nGgeibe: new towns, universities, tansport infrastructure dai, ot this period will somehow have to do for the majcrity of us and our children till the latter are middle-aged. e But atteries were hardening . In 1970 the DOE - a concept that would have seemed revolutionary 25 years earlier - established itself in the now familiar faulty towers, sited carefully separate from Wai tehall , and expressing so precisely its blant combination of - technogracyand officialdom, to provide over a process that was already _in decline. . . | ‘What would happen now? Obvious with hindsight : c simple coronary case with onmplications. We ran out of fuel - petro- chemical, financial, and most important social. For by new the assumed popular consent on which all. this developmentha.d been based was solidly organised into community groups, environmentalists, conservation lobbies, spaceship earth economists, tec of. increasing : expertise. It began to seem once more tat the people with the i power were less intelligent than the people without it. The complications? Almost as fast as the devel~pment boom fever was dying in-the establishment the antinodies were being absorbed. Particpation, piecemeal planning,rehab and recycling have been hastily substituted in the official policies of national and local authorities and the professional institutilns such that concepts of ‘community Architecture’ and Neighbourhood Participation! are already bandied with bogus concern and trendy ‘humbug, without much noticeabte advantage to the intended beneficiaries. The cur rent climate is pluralistic and diverse to the extent that, given the rifgt form of words, everyone can apparently | claim to be progressive - the 193, RIBA, most L.A.'s, the RTPIetc, etc - concealing the fact that major idealogical change is occurring with little or no commensurate redistribtuiion of power. Environmental matters continue to be detemminedon the basis >f power, not of need, and the status quo is effectieety maintained. It is this situation that NAM was formed to study and pehetrate. So much for what mounts to the context in the -utside world. Meanwhile, what eftia’ contest in the profession? In the same perind the profession has transformed iteself from a craft-orientated elite of aesthetic gastronomes supported by forelock tugging- draughtsmen, into and army of professionals dpeendant on a very. different calibre of re cruit, a university educated, m:inly middle class mass of aspiring principals whose habit of .identifying with employers has blurred their vision of the pelitical reality within their offices and throughout the RIBA., ~~ (Contecsseces Salafied architects, more direct and satisfying relationships with the users of their products, have little to be optimistic about because of the economic crisis, The professions governing body, RIBA, is dominated by the interests of private practice and salaried architects have to realise that the NAM is the only effective voice challenging the Private Practice Principal's Party, 66 Portland Place. Such a state of affairs, the majority of the profession, who may hope for profession is misrepresented by default (or not'at at the best of times, between principals use of architects only existed by surrogate clients and a remote. beaurocratic offices. , , now that the crisis and assitants, established and still at college The Middle Hast Klondike can only briefly disguise daily more apparent. the fact that wheras. the publiss access to lawyers and doctours was relatively easy, until the goverment cuts reduce this too,. the. publics when 80% of. a all) would be absurd bites. home the contrdictions Ae grow ‘It is out of this uneasy climate of reality and alussion, wisdom and displicity that N.A.M. developed. At the unlikely venue of Harrogate a gathering of under a hundred people meet for a weekend in November. 75, at the invitation of a small group called ARC.. ARC had been preoccupied with such questions for a couple of years, . The outcome was the nucleus of a New Architecture Movement which has since distinguished its own identity from that of. ARC and at the ‘same time consolidated its aims and membership. More on aims later.. The two essentail characteristics of the Movement that Harrogate established ares- a. It must have a constructive attitude founded on strong annalysis. Yet another vocal articulation scemed unnecessary and abortive. b. That its structure should be both federal and national, allowing the individual personal involvement and avenues of action. Apart from a rudimentary’ Liason process the character of the movement is its diversity and localised basis. A centralised. power elite was seen as alien and unconstructive. : Individuals and local groups spread’ throughout the country make up the movement, ‘all aré of an equal status and are free to develop their own programmeisn support of the generally agreed aims. Any material produced is signed, Bdinburgh NAM Group, or NAM Cardif Group. The purpose of the small, at present London based, Liason Group is to maintain and develop contacts and to set up the next National Congress. If you are thinking of joiningw.e hope that our contact list has a member close by you, if not then we would be delighted if you initiated your own NAM Group. Speakers and information can be sent to youe In time a network of groups should develop to cover the country, each one working out its own ideas wcther localised or more universal. The Congress will be one way of communicating between groups and for working out overall aims and strategies, The key to this decentralised structure is that of individual comnitmant and local autonomy. ‘We are not a movement with presidents or celebrities, its strength lies-in the involvement of you, and «the help we can all give ‘each other. , . NEW ARCHITECTURE MOVEMENT 1. BACKGROUND 9 Ithastakenalmostexactlyined yearsforthe impetus behind the first iodern Fovenent in this country to be exhausted, The festival of Britain 1952 and HAHY 1975 might hhe_ taken as theofficial nilestones at “ee inaireeepbolm ana closure. ef the period respectively. Weseemfostandnewsithepees ofanewphase_ in which the criteria of ‘relevant' action will be determined as much by the. understanding of aim legacy as our-current political standpoint. | | The —— of the pesedas of radicalization induced by war could be seen in the arrival of the first modern Socialist ote tent ait its far-reaching social reforms on the dninestic: scale, and sn cur modified nation status in ate and the realization that we were n> longer an ‘imperial power. be InmatterscfaeecontheNewTownsMovement, the Town & Country Planning Act 1947 etc., were ‘the first expressioonf a new cision and esnfidence that had already permeated other sectcrs of i including for example the health services.. The South Bank fixchibition and the Associated Housing schemes in Langbury, ast London epitomised: the meine of exuberance and ‘committed concern! medie- Showin that modern architecture was notsimplyaflatroofaksewindow,butacomprehensive— urbanlanguage.The neideas,hadofcoursebeened out long befare : it was “cadified visually im the 1938 Exhibition of the Mars Group, which ‘itself derived its, premises ftom the osuede CIAM movement in Barope. was different both in degree and in kind. But theclimate of 1945 The post-war era. fdr the first time "new wisdom', hithertu preoccupation andenlightenedbourgeoispatrons,withallee of government and the major institutions. At the very msment that the pioneer's thesis appeared t» be vindicated, so the process ef institutionalizing its assumptions began in its adoptiobny a new establishment due-ta become iyPind pels more sophisticated and bUreaucratic than any hitherte. flaturally it was intelligent: enough to eavserb . the prece s and personalities that would otherwise have heen dynamite, and. tipoustont fai '50's the professions of architecture and Se aneae were happy to be included in the monolithic drive for reconstruction. The anti-thesis which was bound to crise in conflict with. this centralist orthodoxy appearcd eaxly in the 1960's; in phenomens, ranging from the satire movement, to student protest, that is at about the time when enthe threefold premise of cheap energy, expansionist economics and enlightened paternalisn, "progressive"architects and planners (now comfortably established in government institutioK§ and well-connected practices) were ready for the big boom. The extent of development, publicly or privatelys sponscred during thel960's, is unlikely tv be equalled during the lifetime of anyone reaching this - and the housing, new towns, universities, tansport infrastructure ete., of this period will somehow have to do for the majcrity of us and our children till the latter are middle-aged. saw the alliance of the of dissatisfied intellectuals Salatied architects; the majority of the professionw,ho may hope for more direct and satisfying relationships with the users of their products, have little to be optimistic about because of the economic crisis, The professions governing body, RIBA, is dominated by the interests of private practice-and salaried architects have to realise that the NAM is the only effective voice ’challenging the Private Practice Principal's Party, 66 Portland Place. Such a state of affairs, when.80% of a profession is misrepresented by default (or not at all)- would be absurd at the best of times, now that the crisis bites home the contrdictions- between principals and assitants, established and still at college grow daily more apparent.. The Middle Hast Klondike can only briefly disguise the fact that wheras the publies access to lawyers and doctours was relatively easy, until the goverment cuts reduce this too, the publics use of architects only existed by surrogate clients and a remote beaurocratic offices. , A It is out of this uneasy climate of reality and alussion, wisdom and displicity that N.A.M. developed. At the unlikely venue of Harrogate a gathering of under a hundred people meet for a weekend in November, 155 at the invitatioonf a small group called ARC. ARC had been preoccupied with such questions for a couple of years, The outcome was the nucleus of a New Architecture Movement which has Since distinguished its own identity from that of ARC and at the same time consolidated its aims and membership. More on aims later. ‘The two essentail characteristics of the Movement that Harrogate established are3- a. .It must have a constructive attitude founded on strong annelysis. Yet another vocal articulation scemed unnecessary and abortive, b, That its structure should be both federal and national, allowing the individual personal involvement and avenues of action, Apart from a rudimentary liason process the character of the movement is its diversity and localised’ basis,. A centralised power elite was seen as alien and unconstructive. se Individuals and local groups spread throughout the country make up the movement, all are of an equal status and are free +6 develop their own programmes’in support of the generally agreed aims. Any material produced is signed, Edinburgh NAM Group, or NAM Cardif Group. The purpose of the small,’ at present London based, Liason Group is to maintain and’ develop contacts and to set up the next National Congress, If you are thinking of joining we hope that our contact list hag a member close by you, “if not’ then we would be delighted if you initiated your ‘own: NAM Group. Speakers and informaticoann be sent to yous In time a network of groups should develop to cover the country, -each one working out its own ideas wether localised or more universal. The Congress will be one way of communicating between groups and for working out overall aims and strategies, The key to this decentralised structure igs that of individual commitmant and local autonomy. We are not a movement with presidents or celebrities, its strength lies in the involvement of you, and the help we can all five each other, But atteries were hardening . In 1970 the DOE - a concept that would have seemed revolutionary 25 years earlier - established itself in the now familiar faulty towers, sited carefully separate from Yaitehall , and expressing so precisely its blan® combination of techroeracyand officialdom, to provide over a process that was already in decline. What would happen now? Obvious with hindsight :-c simple. coronary case with complicationsW.e ran out of Padl-Spesies chemical, financial, and most important social, ‘For by new the assumed popular consent on which all this development had been based was solidly organised into community groups, environmentalists, conservation lobbies, spaceship earth economists , the of increasing expertise. It began to seem once more that the people with the power were ‘less intelligent than the people without it. ‘Tne complications? Almost as fast as the develapment boom fever was dying in the establishment the antihodies were being . absorbed, Particpation, piecemeal planning,rehab and recycling have been hastily substituted in the official policies of national and local authorities -and the professional institutilns such that concepts of 'odthimind ty Architecture! and Neighbourhood Participation! are almeaee bandied with bogus concern an? trendy humbug, without much noticeabje advantage to the intended beneficiaries. . The cur rent climate is pluralistic and diverse to the extent that, given the riGet form of words, everyone. can apparently claim to be progressive - the DOE, RIBA, most L.A.'s, the RTPlLetc, ete —- concealing the fact that major idealogical change is occurring with little or no commensurate redistribtuiion of power. ea matters ccntinue to be détexminedon the basis -f power, not. of need, and the status quo is effectieéLy maintained. It is this© situation that NAM was formed to study and pehetrate. So much for what amounts to the context in the ~utside world. Meanwhile, what ofour ccntext in the profession? In the same — | pericd the professicn has transformed iteself from a sine esomicatated elite of aesthetic gastronomes supported by forelock tugging draughtsmen, into. and a of professicnals dpeendant on a , different calibre of--re. cruit, a university educated, m: nly middle class mass of aspiring principals whose habit of identifying with employers hag blurred their vision of the pelitical reality within their offices and throughout the RIBA. Contessscces As a creative activity architecture, supposedly represents values that exist beyond mére building. -All creative activities experience, to some degree or another three converging forces, the force of the imagination, the power of technics and the exercise of patronage, All three interact through design and their resolution is the creation of forms. In the -sence of patronaze technics ind imagination have no context and thus no substance or meaning. For a Schubert or a Gaugin such constraints as imposed by patronage were minimal for they were in effect their own patrons dirécting their creative energies towards their own needs and conditions. But in architecture his is by no means so easy, for it is a rare occurrence for the architect to aCe asLene own patron, except say, when he builds his own house, = ran, | Ofallthe’arts,then,dirt teeis‘particularly:depengenton oehas patronage., for without patronage: theré is no building and without want For the alternative’ cectthologists thee is: bub one fate, the ‘eventual take over by the owners of production who will. appropriate. their creations to furt her ‘their ownends. Those inventions: ‘that, shave a potentialforgeneratingprofitandmaintainingtheiSiSquowill be exploited; thése that do not will be thrown away::.For<:the conceptualis ti there is only.the world of fantasy anddreams,. Like _ the 'trip' cone too many it will end in trauma and despair, their self inflated bubble will burst,for it has little content and no. Substance. The New Architecture Movement offers a third alternative to this impasse, It is devising a strategy that attacks the heart of the dilemna, the principles of patronage. The notion of patronage encompasses variety of associations but their common reference voint is to an unequal relaticnship between benefactor and benificecry. The ben&ficery of course is the architect. How do we define patronage in our context patronage is the means by which the building needs of individuals and their institutions are determindd. ‘ie realise thet under any social system there will alvays be more users than patrons but we do not see this process of assessing building needs as an independent variable to the design problem. It is intrinsic to the forms that we will create. This is a »rincivle of our movement. We cannot wait for the real patrons to stand up. “Ye must go to them, but this will only be achieved by removing the obstales in our own institutions, ‘irchitecture', it is suggested is the social art. buildingarchitectture:eetne:realmsofgraphicsand.-sculpture. For those whose art i8’less,dependent on external patronage for their ~ well being there has been the opportunity to Tiberate themselves from stereo-typed convention, but, in. architecture we'have.been trapped, "ach move into a mew mode of work is frustrated.‘ Those whohave . “© °+4 attempted to escape ‘by side stepping the issue altogether have fled ‘to the world of ‘alterna vtive technology! or to the ‘vorld of the: ‘conceptualists'. beunb bso Certainly the creation of saci itsolenee is a prerequisite for civilisation. Undeniably, it effects everyone's aspect of peoples lives. And yet we have situations where architecture, which is about living, is practised by a group of nveople, architects, who have erected barriers around themselves. Our conclusions can only be thatthe barriers have been erected because either the practitioners are incapableo’f practising architecture or unnecessary, or their masters, the patrons, misuse their practice. Thus it is our belief that the institutions of architecture operate not only to the detrimmt of the non patrons but to architects themselves. ae a i NAM identifies these institutions as the way architects are organised, their education and their methods of oractice. ach in turn reinforce and sustain the present system of patronage and moreover because the architect is the beneficery in an unequal relationship, they were intended to do so, If we accept that patronage is ultimately exercised for its own benevolence whether for prestige, profit or povrer and if it is the means of assessing the building needs of society than there is a prima facie case of ‘aiding and abetting'. NAM intends to ex2mine each institution in turn. NAM will demonstrate the vay in which thése institutions act-for patronage by isolatinz the practice of architecture from its context. The RIBA claims to speak. for architects as if they were one voice, Assension and arguement is confined to the closed doors of Portland Place. It thefefore snuffs out any attempt to undermine a system of patronave at which it is the beneficery. Through education it produces students who aquiesce to the status quo because the nature of their training has concealed from then the true nature of their work, The organisation of practice is so structured that oo is only able to: function in the context of the existing patrons S65! ‘ 2. ROCA.1 Similarly Housing associations, fousing netion Areas and (IAs are controlled by professionals at the expense purport to serve, In the long term, impotent, for it is through real participation where the bases for decisions are exposed to all, that the orofessional will foster his own development. of the residents whom they this can only render the professional , Private praapiece is accounta iis only. to the minority who weild power. ive. that small: group we have identifie@ as patcons. “here is no effective means of control by those who are affectedb’y the buildings thus produced and there is little public awareness of the profits yielded by ‘the fee scale. ithin offices, a minority of employer architects exercise hierar-— chical control, due as “much to their orn inclination as to their respon= Sibilities under Partnership Lars _ wheir employees, lured by the carrot of eventual advancement = if+they find favour ~ are suspicious compet i~ tive and divided. Such a system Will, in the long. term collapse for . Lt is not sufficiently flexible. to respond to the hang ing pattern of patronage the dominance of the public client and the incrreasing social economic and environmental ayureness expréssed by the public at large uhether in conservation issues or politicshl: stances. N.a.ti. therefore proposes a whole range of reforms vithin practice, from ensuring that.- private offices are subject to a form of local accountability, to office structures based on the principles of co-ownership. Salaried architects should be given a real opportunity to organise and join unions for without such strength thoy are at the mercy of the mar'cet. Mor the public sector architect there looms a different series of frustrations, Local Authority architects work in large centralised rigid organisations which, while professing to serve he public, in reality serve md are acountable only to co.mittee chairmen, Direct contact between users and architects is at least discouraged or forbidden, whe monolithic. internal. hicrachy fosters the promotion ethos. Success isto move out of ‘architecture into management, Rarely: does the Chief Architects’ heavy responsibility for huge expenditure to one client create an office spirit any more inspired thai ell- organised defensiveness. “hy: is this so? Host:public architects have arm bclief in the justice of their cause. any have gone to good nublic offices to escavethe ~ partner breathing down their nec. Might it be that the system has been so devised to tolerate the mediocre. or that it is so fail-safe that no practitioner is that importent? It is clear that as bureaucracies develop, the definition of roles becomes increasingly.restrictive. ‘ihe public architect is insulated from the very problems which a#e the substance of building needsj and the exercise of his imagination and still becomes irrelevant whe New architecture liovement believes that the tide which is continually eroding the basis ofthe architect's work can only be turned by surplanting the local authority service by a National Design Service based on de-- centralised local authority design teams and offering a freely availa>le service to groups and individuals in local -reas, Jhese teams would be organised in such a vay that not ohly would they to help articulate the needs of residents but -also implement them, such an intimate’ relationship vould automatically introduce a means of accountaability. Thisisnotavaguenotionofcontrolor ee butaparticipatory process by which the skills of archit cots do not hide behind a. bushel but are exposed to the commonsense of the layman. she setting up of small scale loc lly based projects should be seen in the context of a national o:xperiment. Architectural education is.dominated and controlled by the RIBA through the Board of Mducation, yet it is,society which foots the bill without any means of control, or rather it has vested its. control in the hands of architects. his has encourageda.n introverted mentality, “i,A.ti.- hasbeendisappointed,butinretrospectnotsurpris«ie:dthefailure of architectural students to respond to the -uestions that N.A.i. ete have posed. The fostering of architectural studies in .a world of unreality, whether in the worst oxcesses of archigoonism or technical‘+ fetishes, is producing a nei generation of draving-board fodder or drop OUTS. o ofpe: cy ho fe yD NAM. intends to set up astudy group to examine the .cuestion of education but itis clear that central to our attitude is to arrange a marriage between schools and their communities. .Schools considerable resources which. could be used community. In general, we should be aiming syllabus in order to enable each school to respond to varying local con- ditions and opportunitics. — *here can be few doubts as to our attitude to the way the. profession is at present organised and controlled.- Eighty per cent of architects wrote off the BIDA years ago. Yet, though it no longer has any moaning for: most architects, its pover is immense and. Council is controlled by the same faces year after year. NW.A.H. secks to establish principles of practice outside the RIBA in architects such a way that’ are not cosettcd in their own front room but are exposed to the street. whese new. principles of practice will range fron of Architecture have for the. benefit of the for more autonomy in ; asetofethics,perhapsin.theformofanoath,modelrulesonprocedur,eto the abolishinogf mandatory fee scale, so that.a range of architectural services is more widely available. :Control of -the activitics of the — profession should be returned .to.where, it was originally invested, namely- parliament. Asthey. stand, the Registration Acts arc. administered by ri ARCUK ‘wiich is mercly afront organisation of :the RISA. WAM. is not a debating society. Its present emphasis on analysis and theory is a prelude,to a programue of action... “hat action .is. aimed zat breaking down the barriers between society and architects, Links will be forged with the local communities where we live through trade unions, tenants associations, local amonity groups and local councillors. “ler: shall work to raise she expectations of the service provided by practices and public offices, On a broader scale, our intention is to co-operate with other progressive gsroups. by lobbying politicians wo-hope to achieve changes in the Registration Acts. ; Our programme is not reformist for all our actions are to be judged-in the light of our desire to seek fundamental changes in the exercise of patronage. In practising community architecture our philosophy is not to offer andy to innocent children hut to demonstrate the failure of established institutions to respond to the people’ needs. By this means people themselves will seck their own solutions; and for architects there is the reward of their oim fulfillment. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource John Allan Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived John Allan Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource Undated https://nam.maydayrooms.org/files/original/3b18aea6997e95880b04a060f7015bdb.pdf 65c5027547ed7536253a763dc695e997 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Trade Unions and Architecture Description An account of the resource Themes included action on asbestos and Health &amp; Safety, and involvement with Direct Labour Organisations and Building Unions. Following comparative research of possible options, NAM encouraged unionisation of building design staffs within the private sector, negotiating the establishment of a dedicated section within TASS. Though recruitment was modest the campaign identified many of the issues around terms of employment and industrial relations that underpin the processes of architectural production. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Letter to Adam Purser Subject The topic of the resource 5 pp. Description An account of the resource Le he ANT AoAn- Co.OuenreQton a C2: Po Det TO prtey© OETeOrN SOO aa wQCralol ObQbme&Cote. Caha cor Ololak. Ke bewbe, te ee ASR laser fos Fo Omurn8 © yoR “KE yo Pr psxQk EQx. beck . ous On Gerrtioenral, V 2 Zane eee ee Mone @Qrxo KCK wana, toh Arve, Ns fo ow > ' ‘Lo _L -fp snen. ee hxorben. Cosas, Sov</ Gro. a ay Pav One R&Sa) Ay WHE, @ Pissoike oksren , CRA An Pt SL a KoneaGp 2)PAOpennyHe,obGat—Cano olbx ~~ &% CEA /LAC, heeCathet’ AK cron Psy AD AQ Vg —/ On.Koobth 2LnbkKeAny& lcaOopAasnnOste GC, & A, Ato 4A MAM && Locke GuecizQhen term , Quel fo Cudaties the. Carbs Sty One my 7 Awe RnOG3D Ss LYAf —fisk EQ eae bt 49 @ oft buss 2 wh of SG 67Lae Kh): Ah, SK. &. D2, a yen Kaen, 2 €Q.0 «st 42. Qe att ey ee AQk QssQin He ee alsasi es Lr2of ro AX, Q Ch bboy Cs oh Lo Cite BAG, C3 be OcSt,~~epee FH A H3D. Giory Shs AL CSL Kfrsrol- M4 yp OOLh ° ARK i awe ARnL£0GQ@ wv Moet J&G e£,@/. -+eme melrol Jae E2SkLo SfQrour SrAwA Qi Aa wr fe AK c _ :SL A so PFRPQLCS, © Of Wee isiPeCle. "oh HeeOhetc@ pow a Se WUC alewdsust, breve & OO Kn.. CL —) WHAmns Pour en romsnrthalQes Sa rrakwrtolr. Qt “cul, nS tKAnnr ‘Oo SS i “Mike OAL ASL QQ an Clee a, if) — G/ OL. LZ 7 Csiro — Qed, DR NAW werk. Ae Som Lone2 : Hy f Qhoi Cato Gre inte Ah AB ORStor. \P2Q Qe A — Cine. Gi , Qruook wed/ . . eae GrekPNA Fon nut Atae QO JP tnolefect Lb oO. Ka ko Be Jon Cn Kine? © Pubber/cshibsnbat NT Hon DORR YS yes Lo oe, 452 LOw 68% é¢QV .ey Aesoo,Chora&ULorCrrakaeALARA QRrUunrG 1 ZL. Wak - SToil oye HK HPAI ihe ole he Qk AQne Mem Von SD rb Qtr e eSleClrAA—~ en apron O€e, “yy Ue ae aleGateQO,f Hse Go Sean Or Sheh” Gum & LyQe wit ALAA dserwlol Z£OnW]0 S20. Ook AlOce | eo LrQIK Too. a ye ae Qh ConesGye bo Conn tste CAL GlOoroO TO a ian th, Obi Quercsw Ott thy &re@Qol LiUlanon —BaAY Jj~ < QL Puma ds Lo Aunsturca th» Av Qn 6& 5) er Adaw /o A ED) 5 fee Zeer poe oie, Sm Hes. Cay 1G RAWA roe —_———. (ostuis, P erie Kass) tea. f% “ark hak 25, oe) S Pr Gf LO Arr Qrerbecd 9 eyAcE YP24ny® & QkSKK Hr Que :oe a . a gn Bop, Ark Ole O20 2 orrh Cri “EOEHG) 69aOel Mes CenfERALO 2, H QvAGke Ze har DP Cau, UwhinPema Sr = bge ue i \ f x= so MA Le ay Ckrsrc, KOE S7Anyd ssowtel 3% 4a Gamk Gy|rrp Oe Corman ad KWLADA ; Goth rw pow ) pte S) hack mAslardruee to Ks aa etts. Osa 7 Olas (fo~ Poser’ *) Crew Be b.Gax7, Qn. ‘cae, bsskeLs ReAQAD ie/Prk of Abs. XGA Aty- / En PLA gasak/ ;ra ony OrndviOt Pore,Coan b & SS Bchensot’% ~~A fas tiny papa olQ& rk cha, Wrehih & UOL, LssprQrd, £Qvuws Rarer ars @. attrac AQ NP4uVP OCAske suid 2oe &ylurdushy Ae anlignad,grireat +f | fern COW, -oe ake ees, AQ ge Gq OW Cnn ; Q Uae Uctinte J Lan, Vor Aton Dsy, Qéswe 7Amd ~ Shien 7 oderk Nip ack. Ls L Dpr2. ARs Crook AnrEQ mace, ALL van Gre / . Not) Set he Mor Anny | AQO642teVourchkAreAQ x«, Quska Corel horQh KOK AL Dire ck Gy Gate Sfrrter! Co Aux ees T2rn%4QS CoMoe Basa, “Ka Uoneting GF tke CewithnAr fSrkd Srp eat a PERCE EN AO Oe lols IO ee ce Thx, Sth tink “hs 7 Pysol oO Olona, OtootiGs ag. <. MegAB DareFOXUsel Q4y 4a, G COAT. Safes the SS PreLANLO (b> ty, Arnaly GQ, FAQk ERQ #2 a / 4.:.} QO. enh |Dfpeorok CxianCagk Xo ourers \)a‘.: ay/Ch 6. TAK WerwerrceeCeal Lanny ,o& ) RALR “bD : bs22 GQecar.r cbflactas! OnsQy (Jour QLQ ARR oy “AQQKXQ % Prinarny NAM boes5k& ADL ; CoOcte, & «9 Chae. owl CSRACL QoQ Crise, fj 0Bhd4 , CYCeeCMe —wk ADae QA Arr Asbo bs22 ascot fo “42 RerniCial, /SleasBQe Gs Toyh SEQIC PAsttel AOur.9 Do Ke hse yee POT we Slack oO, On eres | & 5 , Aoe2l Ream cn APC, ke ~— Shrek, ,» Oe Ak KK, tro tp TEAS Ge GED Mo BS Ar ee Iie, LORE VO4H 5 Cok | ae uty Sh cg. AW reo & KWH as Hf Carnok ee” © atin QO, acaek pa oe, bsentel POS. / Ay Arce«pon SOPER le \ SEs hn (m. Y. iD’ pttee / i15LQoeSPQ os42. Qk Sees ABS OSAHL,OL7,feas4&nOCL.Q ADH QL2 eo /~mh a ostChk aoe HS SOnifon, we Kali Druk ofr AK Q ta3 na: wT). AGKETIAQ 10, Loss (J a ee & cacy Gy ol Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource John Allan Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived John Allan Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 24 April 1977 https://nam.maydayrooms.org/files/original/7842940760d83486fef39b449f7b1545.pdf 311796437b1bdad2165d5291d2f27468 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Miscellaneous Subject The topic of the resource Miscellaneous issues Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Various Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1976-1980 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Draft Presentation Subject The topic of the resource Hand-written draft presentation examining the reasons why NAM appeared now Description An account of the resource N.AM. is a movement of architects and laymen committed to radical change in the relationship of the profession to the public, and within the pro- fession itself. N.A.M. believes that architecture is a public service which should be available equally and directly to all sectors of society. Therefore we are working to redistribute power in architecture among the 80% of the population who at present have no say in the design or use of their environment. The following pages give a synopsis of our background, structure, aims and programme of action. If you wish to find out more or join us, contact :— Nex. Aiden70K MOU ERT Bia Reeatibinee/LDBac Ghana) 4 40, Bla Ahurre aie etek, faye gf te rmMtr AsLiiiol ® firlx Jb her. MPUOMAQ UL! baOw &£9&4OnRol &Bek9GrQa: VS1 Qo Beads OPS mghe|62MAW Q!heYoh ? |frteOe7Ks Gey ge. JAsrivel “AumreAyey ANP I<h— 7 miley Qe Ax wWQreurQde Quo Couire Ky Hes agHyArocesFDBachan!Olocse CQ Arik 27%, fis Sax asclen WSoudtwe Onan, AME nk iG -OLAS Vereot AS ou Ae Aemitc OQ Guo WOon ASG fr20k Kjhen hebeeZmab'eGobet| Q moe GIR Ga Swe Cuentue” pmhlrad WOmabamict JL. Ths.Ps boQeCOfr&fakCor QuAs QUDMnAg 2 £2 Phra, CH GH “Any ween KO Qeomtrrs fos 5AERhoe PreeSOOLand Procsuey, NEG Aa G Denon, SayQu bse 4 Bote tom a, QAQ)LQ &&, CO Ching tKcr faeprel, anna depevlsOtee Quer Cunradurati “Qn Ashgbee , MVE Ka, A wsQ, wOK ee LC 6 Bbrtersg Gas A Out |Qrrol Arngtsuxe 4O%og, a PASE ING [RC -gon ah Oem 4aGar ado, e hs. PRESALS ALG 50tae » XEPawioek Qee bwkigcenekPEERQN 4 ma’ “ee (45% ConrfnO46 Bihho US FORD VELL, Crack oth - Cee Ane tgl rock Ar.grnQ. 2|; mk “—e = Le PT—QL ke Y[rvod anh Votstssay oy oC, Qn ' SLDPres7 GH 6lQrk OrQ0QbK,.J uF° Ane ; . bok Qh Arclriisit : Qi Carlet Se Ussus Asst) bip Core +|/ a ADDY Qurrol mek Qe ria ARIK AGA Cenodtoten | | SPrurncas Asw Ky KS OCrnalon Osrnemntée VAG IN ae Mroeen wa ing af . Serer Ene, Bs Jor JPswrtr Adan Tks. Ceri ]GurlSficBiel,,fPrenetaCrayQretire Swe Ss Prot Hk woaar, PepPra Qeunork 42. Kil rep BA LeouminG ssg, VeGole, Guo OLS rQtimrg x Raat ok — [Avtrs- AguccQ 26 » ink ARQ. 2 Abae aw Mes NK Sen. ey euOL AU - orsQurirol |)CMeCb. @becs4 7 Qe oa Anbhixzadh Act unCO % 4a WRG Tks Crnrente COMO PwWwOly,be Cro olives AS.Qt KOK Fin &UM om9arvet, te we ou Cow, GP Aetinkbg CHK &Qo JOY rg ~— keyYon, KR MAO OR Net PRL ENG “4 oC : : . ni CE res ;. wa toncte & af poy wlOoke AuowwrG f& ow Cece wow eh 77BuSEn wehae Ow Contix — Ere frrnnsick ohLY/ Soom Qo OBE onentacttCGhI Ele x Ante Oobroneat ann Gok SsSoriGc — “99 ey SolesAnan PrsoleriaeQed Pree uvte Orrey J PEfrra hs CEAle .A ms. Q Ly SEYfart QeaEng WRCROSE LQ anora LALKCQCa be A OGRA ane, ENS S88 7d PINAL PMR MeSik NPS | Ka R8A, RS ednmmotos, NE hea”Onn AOLy Sy GQrck aa chy wo oe,eon@Ve,Of ohPod ZLhbete TA,seer, Qyp2 Ov Ques At he ela tet wntrkale 7 a Qn 4M, LonelyA20h, aR Qo tame » Oa VAGLR Corneie) ae Anol BasKO GAArecctnsch Eyal Alonwow Ga. Ensen PS De £ wiésr greys Pat. ALE. (Ao Acer, Aveslbers opars AQ WOW Are yate ) CBA ret foe KOA See oh Je @ =< =) A920. irre ; Tho ‘Enktsre Wee & rrnetorre Q Alan GHmslembieoeAe ARCQruolOKKevOug Cin2 Cerrehole G now hig Qucl if Ques, Of Ks. Btn reno onll 2 VQ COLD, A909 LR £0OLhenkeof MP5ane Gn foe.. Rat ksfoneAO af Rebun Gust Cont TTMacine 40 H.QtQR Oak the UMDbrsol Amr2 Work, Alnth,OnAictrek, MSA lak ERAIO QLLARSryou0l ueShee|Qinck g Ra Leg QPreyCom Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource John Murray Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived John Murray Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1977?