5 10 310 https://nam.maydayrooms.org/files/original/f8fee06a4c003debe70d5920632d1fb6.pdf 2807ac8f6e97ad4712fc3873120d0096 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Professional Issues Description An account of the resource A cohort of NAM members became engaged with the professional registration body, standing as elected councillors on the Architects Registration Council and its various committees. Hitherto entirely dominated by the RIBA bloc, the Council began to yield to a new dynamic through NAM's involvement, enabling fresh perspectives on such issues as mandatory fee scales, greater lay representation on the body, ethically-based standards of professional conduct, etc. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Brief particulars about candidates for forthcoming election to ARCUK Council (4pp Leaflet) Subject The topic of the resource Brief particulars about candidates for forthcoming election to ARCUK Council (4pp Leaflet) Description An account of the resource Architects Registration Council of the United Kingdom Brief particulars about candidates (i) Age Date of Admission to the Register of Architects. Name of Architectural Constituent Bodies of which candidate is a member (if any). Present professional post (including the name of the firm or employer) and previous professional experience. Committee experience (architectural and otherwise). (vi) Personal statement (if any). JOHN STEWART ALLAN 34 years 1976 ii i ) Unattached Project architect employed by Shepheard Epstein Hunter since 1973. Previously employed at Department of Architecture and Civic Design, The Greater London Council (Housing Division) ARCIJK: Member of Council 1979-80. Professional Purposes Committee 1979-80. Admission Committee 1977-78, 1978-79. Design & Industries Association 1967-69. Junior Liaison Organisation 1975-78. Chairman Highbury Plan Group 1975. Steering Committee, Blackstock Road Advico Centre 1978. TASS Building Desi n Staff National Advisory Committee 1977. Founder member, New Architecture Movement. Is ARCUK a •public interest body' or not? If it is, its constitution requires amendment to allow proper representation of that interest. If it is not, then its practices must be reformed to enable it at least to operate satisfactorily as a professional assembly. Either function could be of value. ARCUK currently claims both, but used as an RIBA sub-contractor it succeeds in neither. If ARCIJK's pronouncements on such forthcoming issues as the Code changes. Fee Scale, professional negligence and disgraceful conduct are to have any independent value, the question must be resolved. NORMAN FRANK ARNOLD 33 years 1979 Unattached Salaried Architect, Brian Golton Associates. founder member of 'ARCAID' (an aid agency for community groups), 6 years in private practice, 2å years in Local Authority planning and architecture. New Architecture Movement Liaison Group and Alternative Practice Group, establishment of 'ARCAID' steering committee. As a member of The New Architecture Movement, I wish to serve on ARCUK to change the representation and accountability of this statutory body. ARCIJK should have a democratically elected lay representation working together with an architectural one, enabling Architects to be made accountable to the public interest. This requires a change from the present nomination of councillors by constituent bodies, which allows no choice by tho majority of architects. Whilst 80% of architects are salaried. the RIBA holds 40 out of a possible 68 seats on ARCUK. Of these RIBA seats. 26 are held by principals in private practice, 10 by Local Authority Chief Architects and only 4 by other salaried architects. These seats are not open to election. There should be a democratic election of every Architect Councillor by all architects: a system operated by doctors electing the General Medical Council. MICHAEL DAVID BROAD 29 years 1978 Unattached Senior Improvements Officer. (Housing Action Areas), Edinburgh District Council. Previous employer. Sir Basil Spence, Glover Ferguson Partners. Presently working in conjunction with Residents and Tenants' Associations. Faculty Board Dundee University 1975; Perth Road Study Group 1975, AUEW/TASS; New Architecture Movement, Edinburgh Group, Liaison Group 1979-80. �DAVID JOHN BURNEY 32 years 1976 Unattached Salaried architect, Shepheard, Epstein 9 Hunter 7 years as salaried architect in private practice working on university buildings. New Architecture Movement. Past-Chairman BDS-TASS London Branch. Local Labour Party GMC & election committee As one of the New Architecture Movement candidates I intend, if elected, to give priority to improving contact between unattached architects and their councillors. Under the present arrangements ARCUK councillors have no statutory means of communicating with their constituents other than by this annual election address. As a result the councillors• ability to represent the views of the unattached on Council is severely hampered. Last year an improvement was introduced in the form of a question•naire to the unattached distributed by ARCUK on behalf of councillors. Further use of the questionnaire has. however, been vetoed by the dominant RIBA group on ARCUK. The message is clear; there are many issues. advertising, monopolies, conditions of engagement, education—on which the RIBA would rather the independent views of unattached architects were not heard on ARCIJK. A fractional charge on ARCUK's assets could enable the immediate introduction of.— A regular newsletter from unattached councillors to their constituents. Postal consultation of unattached before ARCUK debates on major issues. PETER JOHN CUTMORE 36 years 1969 (iii) Unattached Employed by Property Services Agency, Department of the Environment, in their regional headquarters at Cambridge since1968 as an architect designing and supervising various buildings of differing type and value. ARCUK: Member of Council and Board of Architectural Education 1979-80. Member and sub-section secretary of the Institute of Professional Civil Servants. Member of Local District Council Architects Advisory Panel. My aim on Council has been to contribute to the task of maintaining ARCUK's independence as _established by statute and representing the interests of the •unattached' by voting impartially on Council. I believe that the Council and BAE should be more open in its business and thus more accountable not only to architects but to society in general. The Code of Professional Conduct, including the Terms of Engagement, should be revised to allow architects more freedom of action in the building process. Principles must be expected of architects but they should not be inhibited by rules. JOHN DAVID MORGAN GAMMANS 50 years 1951 Unattached County Architect, Northamptonshire. Previously with City and County Architects Departments and National contracting organisation. (v) Society of Chief Architects' Practices and Procedure Committee; Joint Consultative Technical Committee. I belive it to be in the best interests of the Unattached members of the profession, particularly at a time of great change. to havo a balanced representation on ARCUK Council. JOHN CHARLES PHILLIP GIBB 47 years 1961 (iii) RIAS Chief Assistant, Department of Building Control, Edinburgh City District Council since 1977. Previously in partnership for five years, preceded by various posts in both public and private sectors. President of SAGE (Student Architects Group Edinburgh) in 1959 and currently involved. in official capacity, with the Building Control, Housing and Planning Committee of the District Council. (vi) In these days of crisis, consolidation and cuts, I fear that our profession may be losing its traditional place at the Head of the Building Team. and in order to avoid this happening we will have to look carefully at our training and at our professional Code. We are, I feel. at a crossroads and we must exercise great care in choosing the right path into the Eighties and beyond. PETER WILLIAM HOWE 36 years 1968 (iii) Unattached (ivy Salaried Architect with Faulkner-Brown Hendy Watkinson Stonor, Dobson House, Northumbrian Way, Killingworth, Newcastle upon Tyne NE12 OQW. Previously with J N Napper Partners, Newcastle— Assistant. Washington Development Corporation—Job Architect. Northampton Development Corporation—Senior Architect. Architects Design Group—Job Architect. G Block Watno a/s, Norway—Company Architect. (v) Northampton Shelter Group (Chairman). Nottingham Civic Society (Committee Member) I am particularly interested in seeing the standard of architectural practice improved, firstly by improvements in initial and continuing education of architects, and socondly by the way in which salaried architects are employed and rewarded. DEREK GLAISTER MANNING 54 years 1950 Unattached Salaried Architect. East Anglian Regional Health Authority. Previously with Basildon Development Corporation, Stevenage Development Corporation, Selleck Nicholls Ltd., Woodroffe, Buchanan Coulter. Architectural Advisory Panel, Cambridge. Component Development Group, DHSS. HUGH PHILIP MASSEY 27 years 1977 Unattached Project Architect, Metropolitan Borough of N. Tyneside. Previously private practice in UK and Canada. (v) Minories Community Association—sometime Committee member. Birkheads Cottagers—committee member, founder member. Designers & Architects Workshop. Newcastle founder member. (vi) My intention in running for election to Council this year is the same as it was last year to give expression to the great many people, particularly within the North East who feel their aspirations and concorns are never solicited or voiced within the Council. I feel very strongly that the unattached are. and must continue to be a positive force with very direct lines of communication to members. My pledge is to make the voice of those without the NBA pale, heard. JOHN DUNCAN MURRAY (i) 38 years 1967 (iii) Unattached Team leader Architect, London Borough of Haringey. Previous employer, Building Design Partnership. Experience: 13 years postgraduate mainly on education and housing projects in local govemment and private practice. Work for tenants associations. ARCUK: Member of Council 1978-79 and 1979-80, Finance and General Purposes Committee 1978-79, Professional Purposes Committee 1979-80. New Architecture Movement: Public Design Group. Ivi) In order to extend the accountability of ARCUK to the public and make it more representative of the profession. I feel that the Registration Act should be amended: Firstly, to create a substantial lay presence on the Council: Secondly. to mako all representatives of the profession on the Council subject to direct election, with seats allocated to different interest groups in proportion to their numbers (salaried architects in public and private practice, chief officers, partners etc.). If elected, I will continue with my colleagues to argue for a more open publicly responsible Council and for policies which aro in the interests of salaried unattached architects. This will involve canvassing unattached opinion and will include, for example. a campaign to abolish the RIBA closed shop existing in many local authority offices. �MARION ELIZABETH RUTH ROBERTS 28 years (ii) 1977 (iii) Unattached Salaried architect Stophcn George and Partners, working for local authorities and community groups. Previous experience five years private practice. ARCUK Council and Finance and General Purposes Committee 1979-80. New Architecture Movement Liaison Group. Branch Council, Building Design Staffs AUEW-TASS As an unattached councillor I think that ARCIJK should become more open, democratic and accountable. One of the ways in which this might happen is for ARCUK to discuss its own finances clearly and directly. ARCUK has approximately €63,000 of investments, a relatively small amount but important. The criteria for the investment of this money are obscure and at present no open discussion takes place over the direction of these investments. The unattached councillors have protested about ARCIJK's previous investments in companies connected with South Africa. I would like to see investment redirected towards more socially responsible institutions and companies. I also feel that ARCUK could invest some of this money in its own system of visiting boards. DAVID ROEBUCK ( i ) 33 years 1976 ( iii) Unattached Salaried Architect with Community Housing in North London. Previously employed in private practice and local government. ARCUK Council 1977-79. ARCUK Professional Purposes Committee 1978-79. Formerly an executive committee member of the 'Save Brighton Station Campaign' and served on the Council of Bribhton and Hove Amenity Societies, and architectural adviser to Green Bar Action Committee in Birmingham. Has prepared and submitted evidence to various planning inquiries and Government Commissions. Member of AUEW-TASS Building Design Staff. Founder member of the New Architecture Movement. (vi) The present rules and conditions adopted by ARCUK regulating practice should be replaced by a new system which encourages alternative forms of practice and service (e.g. architectural and design/ build co-operatives) more diverse methods of charging for it, and for the first time, real accountability of the architect to the user. DAVE SUTTON (i) 27 years 1979 Unattached Salaried architect, Solon South West Housing Association. Previous experience study of area improvements, including working with local community organisations. Founder trustee North Sheffeld Housing Association. Delegate to Bristol TUC from AUEW-TASS. Secretary Nottingham Street Neighbourhood Group (1973-1977) I consider that ARCIJK's Board of Architectural Education, the statutory body responsible for recommending exams, for entry to the Register. should be the forum to bring together representatives from inside and outside the profession to develop real accountability and social responsibility. Architectural training provides an important opportunity to link the profession with the community—using a local framework to establish real social constraints and promote sound technical competence. As a start ARCIJK should no longer delegate this duty to the RIBA through the system of visiting boards. EDWARD WALKER 29 years 1976 Unattached Currentlv in local practice in Leeds (under own name) engaged in work for community groups and organisations. Previously employed in company architects' office, PSA.. Landscape Design Office (Brian Clouston Partners). small private practice. Also supervisor on Community Centre Renovation Building Project. Member of 'Arcaid' Group. and aid agency for Community Groups. ARCIJK: Member of Council, replaced David Robson (resigned). and Admission Committee 1979-80. New Architecture Movement: Chairman AUEW-TASS Leeds West Branch 1979; Leeds Trade Council Delegate 1979. As an unattached councillor I would wish to promote a full and critical review in open Council of ARCIJK's disciplinary role and its criteria for disciplinary action. ARCUK's disciplinary concern should concentrate on serious questions of public welfare rather than being preoccupied with trivial infringemonts of the code. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource ARCUK Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived JA Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource Undated https://nam.maydayrooms.org/files/original/b9c8efb22694013f33b0b790acec8b37.pdf 6ea27b95abe8e426523a554c86e803b6 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Professional Issues Description An account of the resource A cohort of NAM members became engaged with the professional registration body, standing as elected councillors on the Architects Registration Council and its various committees. Hitherto entirely dominated by the RIBA bloc, the Council began to yield to a new dynamic through NAM's involvement, enabling fresh perspectives on such issues as mandatory fee scales, greater lay representation on the body, ethically-based standards of professional conduct, etc. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Papers for Fifty-fifth Annual Meeting of ARCUK Council Subject The topic of the resource Papers for Fifty-fifth Annual Meeting of ARCUK Council (28 pp total) Description An account of the resource 73 Hallam Street London WI N 6EE Tel: 01-580 5861 Registrar. Kenneth J. Forder M.A. 41/87 FIFTY-FIFTH ANNUAL MEETING 18 MARCH 1987 AT 66 PORTLAND PLACE LONDON WI Note: This meeting will start as soon as the 220th Ordinary Meeting has ended. (An ARCUK tree is attached for nev Members of the Council) A G E N D A Apologies for Absence 2, The Council 'To constitute the Council in accordance with the appointments listed as Annex A 3 . Appo intment of Chairman and Vice Chairman Board Committees and Panels etc. To constitute Board and Committees- — see lists attached as Annex B & C To authorize the present members of the Awards Panel and General Purposes Committee to the Board of Architectural Education to continue to serve in these capacities respectively. See lists attached as Annex B Pc 11 (c ) To authorize the present members of the Advisory Panel on Admission to the Register of Persons with Commonwealth or Foreign Qualif ications under Regulation 27 to continue to serve in this capaa it y pending the next meeting of the Board of Architectural Education and Admission Committee 5. Cont inuation in office of the Chairman of the Board and Committees until new appointments are Inade at the first meet ings in the new Session 6 . Dates of Meet ings To approve the provisional l ist Annex D Any Other Business Registrar: Kenneth J. Forder M.A. 43/87 COUNCIL MEMBERSHIP 1986/87 AND 1987/88 Members marked (R) are due to retire on 18 March 1988, those marked (A) are appointed on the same date. Nominating Authority Member(s) FRIAS, FRTPI, FCIOB MIA (R) Miss N D Beddington, MBE, RIBA, FSIA K S Bingham, RIBA N M Bri 11, MSC (London), Dip Arch (Leeds), RIBA R S Critchlow, Dip Arch (Sheffield), RIBA A Cunningham, B Arch (Ľpool), RIBA Mrs R Curry, Dip Arch (Sheffield), RIBA c W Daly, BSc (Hons) Arch, (Belfast), RIBA K Eastham, Dip Arch, Dip TP (Manchester), RIBA R Forsyth, B Arch (Strathclyde) , RIBA, FR IAS G Graham, CBE, MA, PPRIBA R M Greenwood, B Arch (Ľ pool), RIBA, MRTPI D J Gregory, RIBA A J Groves, RIBA P Ha 11, MA Dip Arch (Cantab), RIBA (R) Prof D J Hinton, AA Dip, RIBA A M Horsley, JP, Dip Arch (Leics), ACIArb, RIBA J M Hutchinson, AA Dip, RIBA M W Jeff el s, Dip Arch (Leeds), RIBA P E Jones, Dip TP (London), FRTPI, FRSA, RIBA J A Lane, Dip Arch, (Leics), PRIAS, RIBA (R) M D Lewis, RIBA Dr J Lowman, RIBA J S Mackie, Dip Arch (Sheffield), RIBA (R) Prof R K Macleod, B Arch (Brit Col), RIBA M S McNidder, Dip Arch, Dip TP, RIBA, FRTPI, FBIM M Metcalfe, RIBA 43/87/2 Nominating Authority Member(s) R Parnaby, BArch, MCD (L' pool) s MArch (Oregon), RIBA D A Penning, Dip Arch (The Polytechnic) RIBA Q Pickard, BA (Newcastle), RIBA P W G Powell, Dip Arch (PNL), Dip TP (Lond) , FRTPI, FCIArb, RIBA c W Quick, TD, Dip Arch (Wales) T H Sherlock, AA Dipl, RIBA R C Shrimp 1 in, MA, (Cantab) Dip Arch, R IBA, FRTPI, FCIARB T D Snow, BA, BArch, RIBA Prof J A Tarn, PhD (Cantab), B Arch (Dune 1m) RIBA A M Taylor, Dip Arch (Aberdeen), RIBA K H Taylor, M Sc. , Dip Arch (Birm), RIBA J C Viner, Dip Arch, Dip TP (Birm), MRTPI, RIBA D B Waterhouse, RIBA (R) c K Wearden, B Arch, Dip CD (L' pool) , RIBA (R) T W Wilkinson, Dip Arch (Manc) , RIBA c Williams, DA (Edin) , RIBA F S Wright, MBE, DA (Dundee), RIBA J Wyatt, MA (Cantab), RIBA D M Yorke, B Arch, BA (Hons Arch) (Manc) , RIBA 43/87/3 Nominating Authority Member(s) Ms N A Hughes, BSc (Wales), B Arch (Wales) Dr M Jenks, Dip Arch (Oxford) PhD Ms M E Kelly, BArch, Dip Arch (Hull) Prof A Lipman, B Arch (W' Wrand), MA, PhD Ms S M T McManus, BSc (Belfast), Dip Arch (Hull) Prof T A Markus, MA, M Arch (MIT) , FRSA T A Woolley, B Arch (Hons) (Edinburgh) Society of Engineers ( 1 ) � 43/87/5 BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL EDUCATION 1 - PROVISIONAL MEMBERSHIP 1987/88 (subject to election of the members nominated for that purpose) Statutory Nominations �The Department of Architecture University of Sheffield The Cambr idge University School of Architecture The Department of Architecture University of Nottingham The Department of Architecture Polytechnic of North London The School of Architecture Leicester Polytechnic The School of Architecture The Polytechnic of Central London The School of Architecture University of Newcastle upon Tyne Prof C A St. J Wilson, MA (Arch) (Cantab), Dip Arch (London), RIBA Prof C Riley, MCD, B Arch (L'pool), RIBA Prof T Matoff, RIBA Prof Ben Farmer, DA (Dundee), MA (Bristol), RIBA � Plymouth Polytechnic Prof A Gale Royal College of Art M Dytham Nominations under the Gentlemen' 8 Agreement �Nominationg for free election 16 vacancies: For biographical details see Document �Registrar: Kenneth J. Forder M.A. 43/87/12 1 - PROVISIONAL COFNITTEE MEMBERSHIP 1987/88 (subject to election of the members nominated for that purpose) ADMISSION CObff{1TTEE Statutory Nominations Nominations under the Gentlemen' 8 Agreement Nominations for free election: 3 vacancies For biographical details see document 43/97/22 11 - ADVISORY PANELS AWARDS PANEL Chairman and Vice—Chairman of the Board of Architectural Education (Composition due for review in May 1987) G Atkinson E Benroy Dr I Cooper A Cunningham M Darke D J Gregory M Jenks P Hobb8 Prof T Markus W Paine J Smith Mrs J Symons GPC to BAE Chairman and Vice—Chairman of the Board of Architectural Education (Composition due for review in May 1987) G R Adams B Beckett A Collier Cox C Dean J P Jacob A Lipman R W Paine �DISCIPLINE COIOf1TTEE Statutory Nominations Nominations for free election: 4 vacancies: FINANCE AND GENERAL PURPOSES C020f1TTEE Gentlemen's Agreement Nominations Nominations for free election: 6 vacanc : PROFESSIONAL PURPOSSES COhff1TTEE Gentleman's Agreement Nominations Nominations for free elect ion: 6 vacancies : �43/87/19 BIOGRAPHICAL DETAILS Board of Architectural Education Nominations for free election 43/87/20 William L Forsyth Alan J Groves Alan R Lipman A L Maddison Peter A P Melvin Ingrid M Morris Stanley G Oven John Pringle Kenneth H Taylor Patricia R Tindale Age 37. Unattached. Lecturer, Department of Civic Design, University of Liverpool. ARCUK Member of Council 1984—87, Professional Purposes Committee 1984-85. Chairman of ARCUK Council 1980—83. RIBA Councillor for 13 years. RIBA Vice—President 1974—76. Member of the BAE for 8 years. Leader of Common Market Liaison Group. Architects Directive Steering Group 1985—present date. Worked in Sheffield on housing re—development. County Architect for Cornwall. Age 61 . Unat tached Professor, the Welsh School of Architecture. Presently ARCUK Member of Council and Board of Architectural Education. Pa8t senior Lecturer and Course Tutor, N.E. L.P. School of Architecture. Past Chairman RIBA West Essex Branch. Have served on IAAS Council and Education and Examinations Board. Have represented IAAS on ARCUK Admissions Committee and Board of Education for some years. Founder Partner Melvin Langley & Mark. Eastern Region Member RIBA Council 1977/82. RIBA Vice—President for Promotion 1982/83. RIBA Vice—President for Education and Professional Development 1985 to date. Principal in Private Practice. Member of the AA. Previously ARCUK Council, PPC and Admissions Committee, Private Practice, Glasgow; R IAS Practice and Contracts Committees Scottish Building Contracts Committee; Arbitrations. Director in Private Practice. Member of the Architectural Association. A Principal in Private Practice. Member of ARCUK Council for some 7 years. Previously served as Chairman of Admissions Committee. Member of Regulation 27 Advisory Panel. Architect in Ministry of Education and Department of Environment until March 1986, when retired from position of Chief Architect. Nov consultant in private practice. 43/87/21 �43/87/22 Admission Committee Nominations for free election 43/87/23 Discipline Committee Nominations for free election James R A Blamire Michael D Broad Roger G Brown Anthony Hickman Neil M Jack Michael W Jeffe18 W J Lidbetter 40 years. Unattached. Self—employed architect with Arcade Architects in Edinburgh, working mainly on inner city housing. Previously a salaried architect in central and local government and in private practice both in Britain and the US. ARCUK Council 1982—87. Admissions Committee 1981--83 . Finance and General Purposes Committee 1983—85. New Architecture Movement 1981—82. Previously involved in various student, union and education cormnittees. 36 years. Unattached. Self—emp loyed partner of Mick Broad and Terry Hughes Architects in Edinburgh. Previously with Edinburgh District Council Housing Department and Sir Basil Spence Glover & Ferguson. Member of ARCUK Council 1981—87, also served on Professional Purposes Finance and General Purposes Committee and Admissions Conmittee. Member RIBA Council 1982-5. Member RIBA Professional Conduct Committee 1979—85, Chairman 1982—5. Member RIBA Code Policy Committee 1985—. Regional Architect NW Regional Health Authority 1975-87. Partner in private practice. Secretary—General of Franco British Union of Architects. Justice of the Peace. Architect in Private Practice. Convener R IAS Investigation Committee. Past Chairman, Scottish Branch, CIArb. Experienced arbiter and expert witness. Hoffman Wood Scholar 1953. Partner, Bass and Jeff e 18. Previously County Architect Cambr idgeshire RIBA and ARCUK Council member. Vice—President R IBA, 1985 - 1987. Thirty—six year 8 varied experience — Local Government, Ministry of Works, Chief Architect & Surveyor R.A.C.S. Ltd. (450 staff various disciplines). Private Practice and College Lec turer. Justice of the Peace (1967) supplemental list. Member of Admissions Committee, ARCUK ( some 15 years). Expert witness (liaising with Q. C' s). At present own practice as architect and surveyor. Richard K Eastham Michael W Jeffelg Sheelagh M T McManus John S Mackie Thomas A Markus David A Penning Peter W G Powell T Harley Sherlock Past North West Regional Chairman. Member of Planning Advisory Group, employed as an Architect/ Planner in Local Government Planning Department (A88i8tant County Planning Officer, Lancashire.) Hoffman Wood Scholar 1953. Partner, Bass and Jeffels previously County Architect, Cambr idgeshire. ARCUK Council lore Vice—Preg ident RIBA 1985-1987. Age 27. Unattached. Salaried architect with Matrix Feminist Design Co—operative, London. ARCUK Member of Council 1986—87, Admissions 1986-87. Partner in Practice of Hugh Wilson & Lewis Worms ley (Middlesbrough Office). Past Chairman RIBA Northern Region & Tees ide Branch. Chairman RIBA Housing Advisory Group. Age 58. Unattached. Professor Emeritus, Department of Building Science, University of Strathclyde. ARCUK Member of Council 1984—86, Board of Architectural Education 1986—87 and prev ious 1 y. Age 58. Member R IBA. Associate Regional Architect with National Westminster Bank. Committee member with Architects in Industry and Commerce. Member ARCUK Council 1977/86. Member of Finance and General Purposes 1979/86. Partner in Private Practice. Registered Architect and ARIBA 1951 . FRI BA 1968. Treasurer, Hertfordshire Association of Architects 1973—1980. Treasurer, Eastern Region RIBA 1979/84. Principal in private practice. Chairman London Region 1984—1986. Member RIBA Council 1981—1987. Member RIBA Finance Committee 1981—1987 . Adrian M Horsley Michael Jenks Mary E Kelly Quentin Pickard Roger C Shrimp lin Angus M Taylor David B Waterhouse David M Yorke Partner in Private Practice since 1978 — Gelder & Kitchen. Past President North Humber 8 ide Society of Architects. Past Chairman Yorkshire Region. Member of the RIBA Professional Conduct Conmittee. Justice of the Peace Associate of the Institute of Arbitrators, Age 41. Unattached. Research Fellow and Senior Lecturer, Oxford Polytechnic. ARCUK Member of Council 1984—87, Board of Architectural Education 1985-87. Age 29. Unat tached. Salaried architect with Bradford Technical Aid Service. ARCUK Member of Council 1986—87, Finance and General Purposes Conmittee 1986—87. Member, R IBA. On ARCUK Council and Professional Purposes Committee since 1985. Partner in private practice since 1978. Chairman (1984), Junior Liaison Organisation. Member of 'Aqua' Group. RIBA Contracts Conmittee. Member of ARCUK Council 1985—86. Past Chairman and Past Chairman and Past Secretary RIBA Bedfordshire Association of Architects. Past Member Eastern Region Council. Member RIBA Planning Advisory Group. Member of RIBA Overseas Affairs Committee and past member of European Liaison Group. Age 53. Principal Private Practice — 30 years. Member ARCUK Council, RIBA Council, RIAS Council. Past President Aberdeen Society of Architects and a Council member and member of its Practice Conmlittee. Age 65. Member R IBA. Retired from private practice. Past Chairman of ARCUK. Member P PC and Admissions Committee. Age 39. Salaried Architect in Local Government. ARCUK Council Member s ince 1979. Member of Professional Purposes Committee Since 1981. �Annex 204/06 ARCI[ITECTS REGISTRATIOII COUNCIL OF UNITED P roar raidi.le for 1907—1988 DAY COUliCIL/C'Oli111TTEE 1987� Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource ARCUK Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived JA Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 18.3.87 https://nam.maydayrooms.org/files/original/641d0ed1e1b3124a29551b8b4d642486.pdf f36a79876d8d8622ae209c1c11554e83 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Professional Issues Description An account of the resource A cohort of NAM members became engaged with the professional registration body, standing as elected councillors on the Architects Registration Council and its various committees. Hitherto entirely dominated by the RIBA bloc, the Council began to yield to a new dynamic through NAM's involvement, enabling fresh perspectives on such issues as mandatory fee scales, greater lay representation on the body, ethically-based standards of professional conduct, etc. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Notice and Nomination Form for Election of Members of Council Subject The topic of the resource Notice and Nomination Form for Election of Members of Council (2 pages) Description An account of the resource A Notice, Confidential Architects Registration Council of the United Kingdom Election of Members of the Council for the year ending in March, 1988, under Paragraph 1 (vii) of the First Schedule to the Architects (Registration) Act, 1931. This document is intended only for registered persons who are 'unattached Architects'; that is to say, those who on the 31st October 1986 were not 'architect members'of any of the following Constituent Bodies, or of their provincial associations: the Royal Institute of British Architects, the Incorporated Association of Arch itects and Surveyors, the Faculty of Architects and Surveyors, the Arch itecturai Association of London, and the Stamp Section of UCATT. (The term 'members' comprises Corporate Members (including Fellows, Associates and Licentiates). Students, honorary, corresponding, and retired members are not regarded as frnembers', and if their names are on the Register of Architects they are classified as 'unattached'.) The Regulations governing the Election are Nos. 43, 44 and 45 of the Council's Regulations. If this document is sent to you in error, please return it to the Registrar with particulars of your membership of the Constituent Body concerned. On the 31st October, 1986 there were 6390 'unattached' registered persons on the Voters' List, which' entitles the unattached Architects to elect 13 representatives on the Council for the year ending March, 1988 i.e. in the proportion of one for every 500, or fraction thereof. The following representatives were holding office on 31st October, 1986 and are willing to serve again if nominated and elected. meetings attended out of a possible You are invited to complete the enclosed nomination form, which, in order to be valid, must reach the Electoral Reform Society (who are acting for the Council in this matter) not later than the first day of January, 1987. No person is el igible as a candidate for election unless he is nominated by not less than six unattached Arch itects; a candidate may not nominate himself. (Regs. 44(b) and 45(3).) Nominations must be made on the official form enclosed with this notice. (Regs. 44(c) and 45(3).) An election by ballot will be held if the number of candidates nominated exceeds 13 but not otherwise. If an election by ballot is held, a voting paper will be sent in due course to every person on the voters' list who has not renounced his voting rights in accordance with Regulations 45(1 1). By order of the Council, Kenneth J. Forder, Registrar 73 Hallam Street, London, WI N 6EE November 1986 B Nomination Form.ConfidentiaI Architects Registration Council of the United Kingdom Election of Members of the Council for the year ending in March, 1988, under Paragraph 1 (vii) of the First Schedule to the Architects (Registration) Act, 1931. 'Unattached Architects' wishing to nominate registered persons as candidates for election as members of the Council for the year ending March, 1988, must complete this form and return it, together with the consent of each nominee (expressing his willingness, if elected, to serve), and a statement under the hand of each nominee (giving the following information in not more than 200 words: (i) age: (ii) date of admission to the Register of Architects; (iii) names of Architectural Constituent Bodies of which candidate is a member (if any); (iv) present professional post (e.g. partner, chief architect, salaried architect, including the name of the firm or employer) and previous professional experience; (v) committee experience (architectural or otherwise); and (vi) personal statement (if any), to reach the offices of the Electoral Reform Society not later than the first day of January, 1987. Any nomination form received after that date, or any nomination not made on this officia/ form, wi// be invalid. (Regs. 44(c) and 45(3).) Nominations I hereby nominate* the following registered persons as candidates for election as above stated, and attach hereto their respective written consents and statementst. (Full names of persons nominated must be given). Signature Serial Number Date *Not more than 13 may be nominated. t In the event of the same candidate being nominated by more than one person, it is not necessary for more than one written consent or statement to be forwarded in respect of that candidate. N.B. This nomination list will not be valid unless it is received at the Electoral Reform Society's offices not later than the first day of January, 1987. To:—- The Electoral Reform Society, 6 Chancel Street, London SEI OUU. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource ARCUK Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived JA Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource Undated https://nam.maydayrooms.org/files/original/408ff8a982fcfac5ba02a685cc4f6ffe.pdf 58213e41a51371619a4081a3a14db231 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Professional Issues Description An account of the resource A cohort of NAM members became engaged with the professional registration body, standing as elected councillors on the Architects Registration Council and its various committees. Hitherto entirely dominated by the RIBA bloc, the Council began to yield to a new dynamic through NAM's involvement, enabling fresh perspectives on such issues as mandatory fee scales, greater lay representation on the body, ethically-based standards of professional conduct, etc. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Note on membership of ARCUK advisory panels Subject The topic of the resource 2 page note on membership of ARCUK advisory panels Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource ARCUK Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived JA Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 5. 3. 87 https://nam.maydayrooms.org/files/original/01f2837e9060210eb54c4c311ae69f82.pdf 77188cb8ea6dc7f78ab15d8404fd723d Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Professional Issues Description An account of the resource A cohort of NAM members became engaged with the professional registration body, standing as elected councillors on the Architects Registration Council and its various committees. Hitherto entirely dominated by the RIBA bloc, the Council began to yield to a new dynamic through NAM's involvement, enabling fresh perspectives on such issues as mandatory fee scales, greater lay representation on the body, ethically-based standards of professional conduct, etc. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Minutes of ARCUK Council Meeting Subject The topic of the resource Minutes of ARCUK Council Meeting of 15th October 1986 (7 pp.) Description An account of the resource Architects Registration Council of the United Kingdom ESTABLISHED UNDER THE ARCHITECTS (REGISTRATION) ACTS 1931 TO 1938 73 Hallam Street London WI N 6ÉE Tel: 01-580 5861 Registrar: Kenneth J. Forder M.A. 160/86 C O U N C I L 218 Ordinary Meet ing — 15th October 1986 M I N U T E S Minutes The minutes of the 217th Ordinary meeting were confirmed and adopted, subject to small amendments — ( i ) by the substitution of the word "been" for the word "being" in the first line of minute 17 ( i) by the renumbering of paragraph 24 as paragraph 20. A presentation was made to Mr Robert Paine, to mark his long and distinguished service to ARCUK. Matters Arising from the Minutes Mr Bingham referred to minute 19 ( i i) and asked what representation ARCUK had made of the "National Council For Vocational Qualif ications The Chairtaan said that representation had been made to place ARCUK's objections on record, but since it was the intention at present to progress up to the fourth level only there did not seem to be any risk of ARCUK being affected yet. ( i i) Under minute 1 5 ( i i) ( b ) Mr L Forsyth asked about the progress of matters on Continuin bt Professional Development and the Chairman said this would be included in the report of the Finance and General Purposes C01,11i11 ttee . 23. Constitution of Board of Architectural Education The Chairman said that following the decis ion of the Council at its last meeting a formal application was duly submitted to the Privy Council for approval for a change in ARCUK's Regulations. ARCUK has now been told that the Privy Council had promulgated the following arnendment to ARCUK Regulations which had been drawn up by the Privy Council, and were now in force:— prescribed manner' for the purpose of paragraph 2 Schedule 2 to the Act rneans a notice in writing signed by the Chairman,' the Vice Chairman or the Clerk of the Board of Architectural Education, addressed to the Council, and containing particulars of a person nominated for membership of the Board in accordance with the provisions of the said paragraph, and of the School of Architecture the governing body of which has gecommended that person for such membership. prescribed number' for the purpose of paragraph 2 of Schedule 2 to the Act shall be twenty—f As a consequence the Chairman said that an approach was made to 17 Schools of Architecture, previously unrepresented on the BAE and all except two had forwarded nominat ions. The following was the 1 ist and Council was asked to approve the nominations : — University of Bath Prof Michael Brawne Queens University of Belfast John Hendry Canterbury College of Art David Coupe University of Dundee Dr Angus Roberts University of Edinburgh Prof Isi Metzstein Humberside College of Higher Education Richard Graham Kingston Polytechnic Dennis Berry Liverpool Polytechnic Ken Martin Manchester Polytechnic Raymond Burton North East London Polytechnic Christine Hawley Oxford Polytechnic Christopher Cross Plymouth Polytechnic Prof Adrian Gale Portsmouth Polytechnic Graham Brown Polytechnic of the Southbank Hans Haenlein Thames Polytechnic John Bennetts This list was approved by Council nem con. John Allan then asked about the position of the seven Schools listed under the first paragraph of the Second Schedule to the 1931 Act which were required to elect four representatives on an annual basis. The new arrangement still meant that each year three Schools would be unrepresented. The Chairman agreed that this was the position but said that the anomaly arose from the wording of the Act. Ile said that thought would be given to this litat ter but the ult Ll.late answer would have to be left until such t itne as the Act was alilended and this was not contetaplated at present. 24. Section 7 of the Principal Act Architect Convicted of a Criminal Offence (Members of the press were asked to leave). Malcolm Nickolls said that the name of Evan Wilfred Ebery removed from the Register with effect from the 16 October 1974 and he was disqualified from registration for 10 years following his conviction at Birmingham Crown Court on charges of conspiracy to commit corruption. The end of the 10 year period was the 16 October 1984 and Mr Ebery had now applied for his name to be restored to the Register in terms of the proviso to Section 7 (l ) of the 1931 Act. As Chairman of the Professional .Purposes Committee he advised Council that there was no reason why Mr Ebery's name should not be restored to the Register. He accordingly proposed, seconded by Kenneth Taylor, that the name of Evan Wilfred Eb&y be restored to the Register under his original registration number wiü effect from 15 October 1986. The motion was adopted nem con. (The press was then readmitted and informed of the decision). 25. Reports ( i ) Admiss ion Committee (Annex A — copy inserted in minute book) The report had been tabled and was introduced by Kenneth Taylor. The Council approved the recommendation that the 109 persons listed in paragraph ( i) (a) (b) (c) (d) of document_ 149/86 be admitted to the Register. The Council adopted the recotmnendation that L S Houston, K W Abbam and C G Delancy be not admitte& to the Register because they had not satisfied the Council that they were qualified for registration. (i i) Board of Architectural Education (Awards Panel) (Annex B — copy inserted in minute book) David Gregory presented the report and the Council agreed unanimously to accept the recommendation that the twelve students listed should receive the corresponding avards. The Council noted the first award to be made under the William Kretchtner Bequest of the surn of [1500 to Vaughan Hart, a postgraduate student at Cambridge University. Michael Jeff els asked the Chairman that in future, reports of the names of renewals in the list of applications could be marked with an asterisk. This was agreed. The report as whole was adopted. ( ill) Finance and General Puruposes C0iar,11Ctee (Annex C copy inserted in minute book) Francis Goodall introduced the report. The report was noted with the additional acceptance of the following reconunendation for reinstatement received since the Committee had met — John Allan and Nick Broad had questions about the price of the Register and the number of libraries who receive it. Michael Jenks and John Allan put questions about the Electoral Reform Society Project to carry out a random sample by means of a questionnaire to check on constituent body members based on the number on the Register at 31 October 1986. Michael Jenks asked for a copy of the questionnaire himself to be sent out with the minutes and the Chairman said that this would be done, Mr Forsyth asked about ARCUK CPD Policy and the Chairman said that the CPD in Construction Group had now been informed that in view of the duplication of payments by architects the contribution of ARCUK would be reduced from E 2900 per annum to E 500 per annum with effect from the 1 January 1987 and that accordingly ARCUK was prepared to accept a status as an associate member of the Group instead of a founder member. Michael Metcalfe asked members to recall that very large sums of money had been contributed by ARCUK in the name of Continuing Professional Development in years gone by and it might well be said that ARCUK has done its bit and that now was the time to leave it to others. The GPC of the Board of Architectural Education would review its interest in CPD. This met with general agreement. The report was then approved and adopted. ( i v) Professional Purposes Committee (Annex D — copy inserted in minute book) Malcolm Nickolls presented the report with two minor amendments and the report was adopted. (v ) Registrar's Report (Annex E — copy inserted in minute book) The Registrar presented the report which vas adopted. 26. Architects Directive of the Council of the European Couununity (Previous reference minute 17 of document 104/86) The Chairman reported that the list of accredited United Kingdom qualifications considered at the June meeting were duly passed to the European Community Commission on behalf of the United Kingdom Government in terns of Article 17 of the Directive. A corresponding list had been received from the Irish Government and the lists from ten other Member States were awaited. The General Purposes Committee of the BAE will be discussing the processing of these lists at its coming meeting. In the meant ime the new draft of the Order in Council (version number Ill) had been received and circulated to Council. Ian Urquhart, member of Council and representative of the DOE, was présent with Mike Ankers of DOE as a guest and the time was opportune for conunents to be made on the latest draft. Ian Urquhart said the draft had been sent to all interested parties and after comments had been received by the end of October, the document would be put to Privy Council and then formally to Parliament. The final version would come into effect in mid 1987. David Waterhouse asked members to note that this was the last occasion on which comments could be received. The following points were noted and Ian Urquhart undertook to receive them on behalf of DOE. Page 5 of the Order in Council third line for the word "a I ' substitute the word "another" Page 5 sub—paragraph (b) the reference should be to only three of the Fachhochschule, not all of them. Page 8 paragraph 5 (2) (a) second line for the word "rendered" substitute the word "provided" and on the next line for the word "render" substitute the word "provide" and similar substitution of these words elsewhere. Page 8 sub—paragraph 7 third line the phrase "on request" should be qualified by indicating at whose request. Page 10 in sub—paragraph 7 (b) for the word "renders" substitute the word "provides Two further points of interpretation were clarified by Ian Urquhart. David Waterhouse then referred particularly to the disciplinary procedures outlined on page 7 and 8 saying that he wished to place on record his disagreement with the proposal to give the Council discretion on whether or not to take into account disqual if Ying decisions in other countries relating Co app I i cat 1 ons for achai s s 1 on. lie subtait ted that were two ma 1 n reasons why this should not be ( i) It could be regarded as discriminatory that an applicant from another Member State may have to answer for previous misdeeds before he could be registered, whereas ordinary applicants under Section 6 ( i ) (c) of the Act would not face such a peril; It would seem that any person who wished to apply for registration in these circumstances could take an easier option by applying for registration as a foreign applicant under ARCUK Regulation 27. A member pointed out that even under Regulation 27 the Council had the right to decide whether an applicant was "fit and proper" but David Waterhouse submitted that the criteria were different. He closed by wishing it to be placed on record that he did not agree with the proposition that ARCUK should be able to look at the anticedents of any cand idate. The Chairman said that the majority of Council wished to retain discretion in disciplinary matters. It was not yet known how the other member states intended to deal with disciplinary matters and it was reasonable that ARCUK Council should retain powers by discretion to harmonise with whatever might emerge on a common policy throughout all Member States. If the Council had no discretion, then the UK might be the odd man out and have no power to operate a common policy. Kenneth Bingham closed the discussion by remarking that the disciplinary provisions of Article 4 of the Order in Council clearly meant that ARCUK would have to establish relations with registration bodies of other States. Previously questions had been raised by Nadine Beddington, R Shrimp 1 in, Ian Gordon, Alan Lipman and John Allan. 27. Joint Committee for Architectural Education The Chairman reported on the recent visit in October 1986 by an ARCUK delegation to San Francisco for a meeting of the JCAR which was actually a year overdue (on the basis that it was scheduled to meet on a biennial basis). The next meeting was proposed in mid 1987 in the UK. No immediate changes had been envisaged to the terms of the Inter—recognit ion Agreement between ARCUK and NCARB but in the light of the implications arising from ARCUK's coming administration of the European Directive, a draft alteration to the Inter—recognition Agreement to filter European applicants who might make use of the agreement to register in the United States was considered. Both sides were agreed that the information exchanged during the two day meeting was extremely valuable and the areas covered included the administration of the NCARB examination, American observations on visits to Schools in the United Kingdom, a discussion on the internship system, ARCUK's policy of recognition of overseas Schools and the degree of acceptance of NCARB accreditation for registration purposes In the various Member States. It was noted that NCARB had terminated its inter—recognition agreement with Australia on I September 1986 . John Smith said he regretted that the numbers making use of the Inter—recognition Agreement to become registered in either country was not greater and Professor Bob Macleod said that some years previously he had come away with the impression that the State registration system in the United States had undue bureaucracy. Michael Metcalfe said he thought that the delegation had done an extremely creditable job. The Chairman agreed to keep the Council informed on developments. 28. Date of Next Meeting December 17th 1986 � Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource ARCUK Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived JA Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 15.10.86 https://nam.maydayrooms.org/files/original/09372d9fb49345d6cf734de0e718c3cd.pdf 734f564d34760eda7a27d85d3a00f6e5 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Professional Issues Description An account of the resource A cohort of NAM members became engaged with the professional registration body, standing as elected councillors on the Architects Registration Council and its various committees. Hitherto entirely dominated by the RIBA bloc, the Council began to yield to a new dynamic through NAM's involvement, enabling fresh perspectives on such issues as mandatory fee scales, greater lay representation on the body, ethically-based standards of professional conduct, etc. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Brief particulars about candidates for forthcoming election to ARCUK Council Subject The topic of the resource Brief particulars about candidates for forthcoming election to ARCUK Council (4pp Leaflet) Description An account of the resource Architects Registration Council of the United Kingdom Brief particulars about candidates Age Date of Admission to the Register of Architects. Name of Architectural Constituent Bodies of which candidate is a member (if any). Present professional post (including the name of the firm or employer) and previous professional experience. Committee experience (architectural and otherwise). (vi) Personal statement (if any). JOHN STEWART ALLAN 36 years 1976. Unattached. Project Architect employed at Shepheard Epstein & Hunter since 1973. Previously employed.at Department of Architecture and Civic Design, The Greater London Council (Housing Division) ARCUK: Member of Council Professional Purposes Committee 1979-80-81, Conduct Monitoring Group 1980-81-82, Admission Committee 1977-78-79. Design & Industries Association 1967-69. Junior Liaison Organisation 1975-78; Chairman, Highbury Plan Group 1975- Steering Committee, Blackstock Road Advice Centre 1978-79; TASS Building Design Staff National Advisory Committee 1977. Founder Member, The New Architecture Moyement. For too long unattached Architects have been regarded as an inconsequential minority whose interest could be ignored. But now numbering nearly a quarter of the entire profession — and growing fast— their significance can be discounted no longer. This years overdue abolition of ARCUKs surrogate RIBA code provides new freedoms to unattached Architects which institutions still encombered with unworkable codes are attempting to deny. The dropping of cartel arrangements should stimulate new endeavours to practise in the public interest— an initiative in which unattached Architects may now take the leading role. I will continue to counter the RIBA attacEn unattached Architects both within Council and in the wider professional arena. NORMAN FRANK ARNOLD 35 years. 1979. Unattached. Self employed, 8 years in private practice, 21/2 years in Local Authority planning and architecture. (V) ARCUK: Member of Council 1980-81-82; Finance & General Purposes Committee 1980•81 ; Professional Purposes Committee 1981•82. New Architecture Movement: Liaison Group and Alternative Practice Group 1978-79. Establishment of ARCAID Steering Committee 1979 (an aid agency for community groups). The past year has seen some fundamental changes of the criteria to be observed by architects in their conduct. Some of my colleagues representing the unattached have played a leading role in bringing these about. We should be wary however that one of the basic aims of the unattached Councillors, around which these changes were to have hinged, has of necessity been temporarily shelved by us for fear of the RIBA Councillors on ARCIJK voting it out of existence. This is the facility for the public recording of architects' business interests. Without this registration we must rely largely on the honesty and integrity of the vast majority on ARCIJK (i.e. architects belonging to the RIBA) for the thorough policing of "Conduct and Discipline". Is this democratic? I ask for re-election to promote "justice seen to be done" on ARCUK JAMES ROBERT ALISTAIR BLAMIRE 35 years. 1975. Unattached. �Partner housing. in Previous the firm professional of Arcade Community-Based experience as a Architects, salaried architect Edinburgh, in central working government mainly on inner and localcity authority and in private practice both in Britain and the US. Previous membership committee of for the the Graduate experience architects' Studies includes department Committee membership in at the the Livingston of University the ARCO branch of K Oregon, Admission of NALGO USA Committee 1978-79, 1976-78.for and 1981-82,as union representative As a member of the New Architecture Movement, my intention if elected is to promote the idea of architectural services becoming more widely available to the community as a whole, including lowincome owner-occupiers and tenants. I see this as a fundamental role for ARCUK as a public interest body. I am also concerned about the im provement of conditions for salaried architects, particulary those in the private sector. MICHAEL DAVID BROAD 31 years. 1978. Unattached. Senior Development Officer, Edinburgh City District Council working on inner city housing action areas. Previous employer Sir Basil Spence, Glover, Ferguson and Partners. ARCIJK: Association Member 1981-82; of Council New Architecture and Admission Movement Committee Liaison 1981-82. Group and Chairman Edinburgh Pathhead Group 1979-80-81;Community AUEW-TASS Edinburgh East; Secretary ADAS Dundee Architectural Students 1974-75. The future existence of ARCUK has been questioned by some members of the RIBA education is under attack and ARCUK must regain the control previously delegated to the RIBA ARCIJK is not the rubber stamp of any one constituent member. As one of the New Architecture Movement candidates I intend, if re-elected, to continue to seek a democratically elected Council that will carry out all of its duties under the Registration Acts, to promote the interests of salaried architects and other public sector employees and for as long as there are inner city areas where few people have ever met an architect I will resist the closure or limitation of numbers within the schools. DAVID JOHN BURNEY (i) 34 years. 1976. (iii) Unattached. Salaried architect, Shepheard, Epstein & Hunter since 1973. ARCUK• Member of Council and Board of Architectural Education 1980-82. New Architecture Movement. Past Chairman BDS-TASS London Branch. One of ARCUK's most important statutory duties is the recognition of examinations in architecture, the passing of which allows admission to the Register of Architects. The Board of Architectural Education is responsible for evaluating courses and making recommendations to Council. In recent years the BAE has sub-contracted this duty to RIBA Visiting Boards in defiance of the intentions of the Registration Acts. This practice has been encouraged by the pre-dominance of RIBA members on the Board, despite the majority lay membership provided for under the Act. If elected I intend to continue to press for the restoration of the statutory recognition procedure to the Board of Architectural Education and for the full involvement of the nominees of Educational Institutions and other lay bodies represented on the Board. PETER JOHN CUTMORE (i) 38 years. 1969. Unattached. Employed by Property Services Agency, Department of the Environment in their regiona I headquarters at Cambridge since 1968 as an architect designing and supervising various buildings of differing type and value. ARCUK: Member of Council 1979-80-81-82, Board of Architectural Education 1979-80, Admission Committee 1980-81. Member and sub-section secretary of the Institute of Professional Civil Servants. Member of Local District Council Architects Advisory Panel. My aim on Council has been to contribute to the task of maintaining ARCUK's independence as established by statute and representing the interests of the 'unattachecf by voting impartially on Council. I believe the Council and the BAE, and their Committees should be more open in their business and thus more acceptable not only to architects but to society in general. 49 years. 1961. (iii) RIAS. Chief Assistant, Department of Building Control City of Edinburgh District Council. Prior to this I was in artnership with R D Cameron for 5 years, following salaried posts in Local Authority, commercial 'in ouse', Contractor/Developer and private practice. ARCUK Council 1981-82, President of Student Architects Group Edinburgh (SAGE) 1959, Student representative on EAA Council 1959. Representing as I do many Architects, who, like myself, have left the mainstream of the profession, I am concerned by what I see from my resent vantage point. Too many Architects chasing too few projects, a never diminishing stream of brig teyed graduates destined for the dole, a general lack of excellence, competitiveness — or in some cases competence, I have to ask, how long can this go on? 100 year old housinq is currently being refurbished and should easily see the 21 st century, meanwhile, 20 year old housing much IS Deliggt, bein demolished, because it has neither the quality of Firmness nor Commodity — it never had and Architects were involved in most of it. Is Pompidou going to fall down before Eiffel? Are "slick shedS' Zeibarted? Why can't we compete with Tom Baron and Lawrie Barratt? If this sounds like the trailer for new week's 'Soap', I only wish it were!, because in a mere 7 days we would "know the answers to these and many other questions". ARCUK should be looking for answers, and concurrently encourage diversification into all related fields — not to escape, but to give strength to the Profession. ALAN LIPMAN 0) 56 years. 1963. Unattached. University Professor. The Welsh School of Architecture, University of Wales Institute of Science and Technology, practioner in Africa and in the UK; various practices, private and public. I have served extensively on academic, professional, public and political Board committees Panel Of the — RIBA including (ARCUKthe ARCUK, the Board of Architectural Education and the Visiting representative); until recently, I was National Co-ordinator of CND Wales. Architects, I contend, must seek and must help to establish ways of ensuring that they are responsive In furtheringto and are responsible to their social clients; to, that is, the users of the buildings they design. this notion of service to public interests — of public accountablility— with my fellow members of the New Architecture Movement, I am committed to action that will restore to the ARCUK and to the Board of Architectural Education the rights and obligations which were vested in the Council and in the Board by Parliament when approving the Architects (Registration) Acts. ROBERT MALTZ (i) 38 years. 1976. Unattached. Salaried employee with et the al), architectural London Borough education, of Haringey, community Previously action employed projects in and private architecturalpractice (Fielden & Mawson, Journalism. ARCIJK: Member of Council 1977-80. Professional Purposes Committee. 1977-78. Board of Architectural Education 1980. Educational Grants Panel 1980-81. New Architecture Movement. Member of NALGO (Departmental rep.). Since I last served on Council little progress has been made in the achievement of democratic reforms within ARCUK. However, the growing number of architects who choose to remain •unattached' provides a growing force within the profession which must be effectively represented on the Council. If elected I shall press committees for the full and representation panels from which of the they unattached have been on excluded the Board by the of Architecturalcurrent RIBA Education and In the on for longer the all architect term I shall representatives campaign for and the for replacement a majority of lay the representation present 'Banana on Council.Republic' by monopoly. direct elections GILES NICHOLAS PEBODY 31 years. 1977. Unattached. JOHN CHARLES PHILLIP GIBB �Senior project architect with the Society for C&operative Dwellings. Previously employed by Levitt Bernstein Associates. I have also worked in the public sector. Committee Founder member of 'Slate' of Magazine the New and Architecture the NAM Liaison Movement Group. (NAM) Erstwhile on which treasurer I served of London on the BDS EditorialBranch of AUEW/TASS. ARCUK Council and Finance and General Purposes Committee 1981. If elected I will continue to press, in the short term for open and democratic practices on the Council, for the reform of the Council to eventual direct election to all architects' seats and, in the future, for the control of ARCUK by lay interests. DAVID ROEBUCK 35 years. 1976. (iii) Unattached. Member of co-operative practice, private sector. Previously salaried employee in private and public sectors (v) ARCIJK: Council 1977-79, 1980-81, Professional Purposes Committee 1978-79, 1980-81, Conduct Monitoring Group. Formerly an executive committee member of the "Save Brighton Station Campaign" and served on the Council of Brighton and Hove Amenity Societies, and architectural adviser to various environmental/resident groups. Member of AST MS. Founder member of the New Architecture Movement. The past year has been a qualified success. ARCU KS new document "Conduct and Discipline" meets the criteria set out in my statement for last year's election. Now the capability of the Discipline Committee will have to be examined. The public recording of business interest remains on the agenda awaiting decision. In the coming year, if elected, I shall endeavour to introduce democratic reforms within ARCUK in order that the Council may effectively discharge its duties and free itself from RIBA abuse. In particular it is necessary, as a first step, that the unattached (who now comprise nearly a quarter of the profession) are fully represented on all ARCIJK committees, visiting boards, and panels instead of the token representation that the present RIBÄ monopoly dictates. EDWARD WALKER 31 years. 1976. Unattached. Currently self employed in Leeds engaged in work for community groups and organisations. Previously employed in company architects' office, PSA, Landscape Design office (Brian Clouston and Partners) and small private practices. Also supervisor on Community Centre Renovation Building Project. ARCUK: Member of Council 1979-80-81-82, Professional Purposes Committee 1981-82, Finance and General Purposes Committee 1980-81 , Admission Committee 1979-80-81. New Architecture Movement. Chairman AUEW•TASS Leeds West Branch 1979 Leeds Trades Council Delegate 1979, 1980, 1981, 1982. NAM members work on ARCUK last year included: Pressing unsuccessfully for more unattached representatives on the Board of Architectural Education. The new 'Standard of Conduct for Architects' is a first step on the road to eradicating the exclusive bosses club domination of Architecture. But have we been duped? Our fight continues to establish the principles of fair play with no petty rules and no unnecessary restraints on practice. Building Control (England and Wales): Opposing the use of membership of institutions as qualification for Self-certification which would restrain the unattacheds' right to practise. The unattached election is the only democratic voice affecting ARCIJK — let it challenge all others. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource ARCUK Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived JA Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource Undated https://nam.maydayrooms.org/files/original/71cad14334b998fecccd422fc44e99f6.pdf e5bc7f7486bbff0f9e2a97bd1942df81 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Professional Issues Description An account of the resource A cohort of NAM members became engaged with the professional registration body, standing as elected councillors on the Architects Registration Council and its various committees. Hitherto entirely dominated by the RIBA bloc, the Council began to yield to a new dynamic through NAM's involvement, enabling fresh perspectives on such issues as mandatory fee scales, greater lay representation on the body, ethically-based standards of professional conduct, etc. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Brief particulars about candidates for forthcoming election to ARCUK Council Subject The topic of the resource Brief particulars about candidates for forthcoming election to ARCUK Council (10pp Leaflet) Description An account of the resource Architects Registration Council of the United Kingdom Brief particulars about candidates (i) Age Date of Admission to the Registration Of Architects. Name of Architectural Constituent Bodies of which candidate is a member (if any). Present professional post (including the name of the firm or employer) and previous professional experience. Committee experience (architectural and otherwise) (vi) Personal statement (if any). The views expresed in the candidates' statements below are personal to the writers and do not represent the views of the Council of ARCUK. NORMAN FRANK ARNOLD ( i ) years 1979 Unattached Partner in a Leeds Practice; Lecturer at the Hull Schoool of Architecture; 17 years in public and private practice. (v) A Founder member of ARCAtD (Leeds); The New Architecture Movement; ARCIJK Council, Professional purposes Committee/Finance and General Purposes Committee- 1980-87. (vi) Over the past year I have represented the interests of Unattached Architects during sub-Committee preparation of draft documents concerning Disciplinary Procedures, hopefully enabling those of us who judge to be more enlightened, better informed and above all democratically fair. If reælected I will attempt to continue in this role. Together with Disciplinary Procedures and inter-European qualifications, Education continues to be a growing sphere of power for ARCIJK with regard to the European Community. I will endevour to represent the Unattached in these areas. Architects everywhere in Europe should be accountable to the public. 1 �JAMES ROBERT ALISTAIR BLAMIRE 41 years 1975 Unattached Self-employed inner city housing. architect Previously with Arcade a salaried Architects architect in in Edinburgh. central and working local governmentmainly on and in private practice both in Britain and the US. ARCUK Council 1982-88. Admissions Committee 1981-83. Finance and General (vi- Purposes Committee 1983-85. New Architecture Movement 1981-82. Previously involved in various student. union and education committees. (vi) The 'Unattached' numbers are substantially up again this year giving us a further seat on Council and a greater voice in the debates on education. conduct and discipline, tie EC Directive and finance. But although the electorate has been on the increase for many years now there is concern among the •Unattached' councillors about the consistently low poll at elections. In order to reverse this tend and to channel energy effectively moves are underway to create greater cohesiveness within and wider publicity for the group of which I am a represenätive on Council. The primary intention is to promote ARCUKs statutory duties in edJcanon and what I believe to be its proper role as a public interest body. Vote this year and support the moves towards a positive, democratic ARCUK. MICHAEL DAVID BROAD 37 years 1977 Unattached Partner of Mck Broad Terry Hughes Architects in Ednburgh. Previously with Edinburgh D.C. Housing Deparünent ARCUK: Counci Nkrnber 1981-1988, also served on the Admissions. Professional Purposes and Finance General Purposes Committee of ARCUK. Fourteen people Will be ELECTED onto the Council this year by the free vote of architects in ali types ot employment. This will be one more than last year and so the democratic representation continues to increase. The attempts by one Constituent Body to dominate the council by nominating their yes men onto council this past year backfired. ARCIJK has at last made some of its own decisions. Support he unattached representatives, on annuaJy elected Council. use your vote and write to those elected c/o The Registrar 73 Hallam Street London with your views. 2 ANDREW JAMES EARL 30 years 1984 Unattached Architect with COMTECHSA Ltd., Liverpool. Previous experience in local authorities and the Architects and Builders Co-opertive (Aull) Ltd. Branch committee-ACTSS (T & GWU). Company secretary-ABC, Committee -Hull Architecture Workshop. Build for people not profit. Work towards public accountability. Take back control from the grey men in suits. WILLIAM LESLIE FORSYTH 0) 38 1974 Unattached Lecturer, Department of Civic Design. University of Liverpool. 1979-86 COMTECHSA Ltd., Liverpool. 1973- 7B The Edinburgh Consortium. Various private and public practices. 1984-87 ARCUK Council, 1984 Professional Purposes Committee, 1979-86 Secretary. Comtechsa Ltd.. 1982-85 Secretary ACTAC, Numerous voluntary committees. The votes cast in last year's election for unattached councillors were less than 25% of the possible total. This represents a lack of interest second only to the turnout at some local authority elections during the World Cup. It hardly displays enthusiasm for ensuring that unattched councillors can act with confidence based on an active electorate. You may have noticed that the unattached have another seat on Council next year, a total of fourteen. In the next few years it is possible that the unattached will hold a substantial minority, if not a majority, of seats on Council. Make an effort, vote. ensure your colleagues vote, stand for election next year, contact your councillors and express your concerns over the future of your profession. 3 ALLEN BERNARD EDWARD GEAL 41 years 1973 Unattached Present professional post: Architect, Urban Design City of Bristol. Previous experience: Architect in pnvate pracbce. Student Representative, School Academic Committee, University of Bath. ARCUK Member of Council 1985 - ; Professional Purposes Committee 1985 - The statutory and indepen±nt role of ARCUK must be asserted against tie narrow •professional- interests of the RIBA This can be achieved hus: The assumption of full ARCUK control over architectural education and the encouragement and extension of relevant research. That is: the endng of RIBA involvement in the Visiting Boards and in the recognition ofSchools of Architecture. Increasing the professional and academic links with European Community professions whilst maintaining our traditional US and Commonwealth links. A vigorous and reasoned response to t•te National Council for Vocational Oaaflfications (a new quango!) in line with those of the Medical and Legal professionsand in distinction to the uncritical and shortsighted RIBA attitude. A reform of the principal Registration Act to bring it into line with the Medical Registration Act That is, to reduce the representation of professional bodies to a nominal (and appropriate!) level and form a Council largely from drecdy elected members of the profession. Now is the time. 4 28 years 1986 Unattached Salaried architect, Property Services Agency, Central Office for Wales. Previous professional experience in local government and private practice, and research into the subject of flexibility in office design, sponsored by the Science and Engineering Research Council. South Wales Women Architects Group. I believe that architectural practice should be foundedon technical competence, and I am therefore interested in approaches to education, information supply and professional organisation that would assist the achievement of a high standard of building performance. It is my conviction that research into the built enviorment is necessary to augment our understanding of how buildings work, and to provide design guidance for architects. I am concerned about public mistrust of the profession and welcome any initiative to set up a closer relationship between users and architects. I feel that sucessful design must acknowledge people's needs and preferences. MICHAEL JENKS 42 years 1975 Unattached Principal Lecturer in Architecture, and Head of Continuing Education, Oxford Polytechnic. ARCUK Council 1984-87. BAE 19857, GPC 1986-7, Awards Panel 1985-7, Advisory Panel 1985-7, Continuing Education Committee. Faculty and Departmental Boards, Oxford Polytechnic. The number of unattached architects is growing. and with it our voice in Council. We have been active in ARCUK's strengthened role in education and in moves to be more closely involved with the validating process through proposals for Joint Visiting Boards. The unattached have an important say in the architectural debate. and are part of the wide representation enabled by ARCUK's constitution. The attack on this constitution by factional interests in the RIBA is a malign attempt to undermine ARCUK's control. and with it the repsentation of unattached architects. Resisting this attempt has wasted valuable time when there are so many vital issues to debate that affect the profession both now and in the future. If elected I will , with other unattached representatives, continue to promote and support moves to strengthen ARCtJKs rightful role as a body that is democratic, representative, publicly accountable. and supportive of architectural education and practice. 5 MARY ELIZABETH KELLY 29 years 1985 Unattached Salaried architect with Bradford Communiry Technical Aid Service at present. Previous expenence; Architect with Free Form Arts Trust, Arch. assistant with Free Form Arts Trust. London; BBC architects Department. London; Forbes Bramble Ass. London; Topham Ravensdale Ass. Zambia; Blackmore Son and Co. Hull. Elected to/served on: ARCUK Council representing Unattached Architects 1986. F & GP Committee (ARCUK) 1986,87; staff Sub-committee (ARCIJK) 1986n; Management Committee Association ot Community Technincal Aid Centres (ACTAC) June 1986-87. It is essential that debate within the profession, and on ARCUK Council. is encouraged so that as many different voices are heard and can contribute. Such debate as there is on Council at the present is largely due to the efforts of the Unattached to bring into question certain majority assumptions and argue for change where and when it appears to be necessary. I feet that it is time for ARCUK to take up the mantle of duties allotted under the Act and be seen anci heard to be rue representative ot all members of the prolession and not simply promoting the views of any one constituent body. I would like to see evi&nce of greater encouragement being given to women to enter the profession by an increase in tie numbers of women on Council. ALAN ROBERT LIPMAN ( i) 62 (ii) 1963 Unattached Academic (Professor), The Welsh School of Architecture, UWIST. Cardiff; practitioner in southem Africa and in the UK - various practices. public and private. I have served on academic, professional. pubfic and political committees - including ARCUK. the Board of Architectural Educaton, the Admission Committee and the Visiting Board Panel of fre RIBA (ARCUK representative). Until recently I was ViceChairperson of CND Cymru (Wales) and a member of the New Architecture Movement The representatives whom you have sent to Council have consistently sruggled to reinsäte ARCIJK's statutory authority in architectural education. I have been part of that sÜuggte since fre mid-197ffs. In contrast to RIBA connivance in educational cuts (eg. via the Esher report). we have won support for ARCUK's rejection of efforts to slash Schools of Architecture and student opportunities. Regrettably more. much more. has yet to be done. We now face wider - and wilder - threats to student numbers, to Schools, to the length of courses. In addition,we must continue our long-standng struggles to make ARCUK a representative forum; one with extensive lay representation and one which reflects the composition of the profession. Vote unattached - help us to fight for a future for archtectural education, for architecture. 6 THOMAS ANDREW MARKUS 59 years 1950 Unattached Professor (Emeritus) of Building Science, University of Strathclvde, Glasgow. Professor 19661986. (v) Previously (1964-66) Reader in Architecture, Welsh School of Architecture; Manager of Products Applications Department, Pilkington Brothers. St Helens (1956-64); Architect. I.C.I. London (1954-56); Assistant Lecturer in Architecture, University of Manchester School of Architecture (1951-54); Assistant Architect, Manchester City Council (1950-51); Studio Assistant, University of Manchester School of Architecture (1949-50). Experience in practice, research, teaching and consultancy; chief involvement in architectural history and theory; buildings, climate and energy; fuel poverty and housing problems; cost benefit analysis and building resources. Involved in teaching and assessment at Schools in USA, Candia. Malaysia, Nigeria, Turkey, and a number of European countries. Committee Experience (Architecture and Otherwise): several three year spells as Strathclyde representative on ARCUK Board of Architectural Education; from 1956 onwards at various times members of RIBA Science Committee, Postgraduate Training and Research Committee, Documentation Panel, Board of Education (later Education and Practice Executive Committee) from 1970-1978 and Vice Chairman of Board, 1977-78. Chairman of Schools of Architecture Council 1977-79. Intermittently member of the RIBA Visiting Board 1969-77. Member of CAA Visiting Board. Member of ARCIJK Visting Board. Member of CNAA Architecture Board and Committee for the Built Environment 1979 — present. Member of CNAA Technology Research Sub Committee 1983. Member of a number of CIB Working Groups. (vi) I have worked in ARCUK and outside it for detachment of architectural products from the aims of elite power groups. This means the transfer of power in design, resource control and management to those with little power — i.e. the vast majority of building users — involving the defence, by ARCUK, of Parliament's clear intention to bring a measure of public control into architectural practice and education. 7 SHEELAGH MARIE THERESE McMANUS 0) 28 years 1985 Unattached Currently a member of Matrix Feminist Design Cooperative. London. Previously with Community Design Service. Cardiff; Community Technical Services Agency (COMTECHSA) Ltd.. Liverpool; Welsh Health Technical Services Organisation (WHTSO). Cardiff; Murray & Doran Archi!ects, Belfast. ARCUK Admissions Committee. 1986 & 1987; ARCIJK Advisory Panel on the Evaluation of Overseas Architectural Qualifications, 1987. South Wales Women Architects Group. 1985; Hull Architecture Workshops Management Committee, 198384; The Architects Qualifications (EEC Recognition) Order 1987 came into effect in the UK on Thursday 19 November 1987. This is the first stage of new legislation throughout the EEC which Will enable architects who have qualified and registered in one member state to have their status automatically recognised by any other member state. In naming ARCUK as the •Competent Authority' to administer and implement the EEC Directive in the UK. the British Government is quite rightly recogn•sing ARCUK as the Statutory Body responsible for the recognition of Architectural qualifications and the regulating of the Architectural Profession in this country. The Unattached play a vital role within ARCUK of reminding people of exactly what ARCUKs• statutory role is and working towards greater fulfillment of its (presently only partly assumed) role as defined in the 1931 Architects Registration Act. It is the only body which has the potentional to represent ALL architects' views in a democratic fashion. Please help to ensure in your choice of candidates that the Unattached view is a broadly based one. DAVID WILLIAM PETHERICK 40 years 979 Unattached Senior lecturer, Hull School of Architecture. Formerly partner in small private practice (1977-84) and research fellow at Institute of Advanced Architectural Studies, University of York (1984-86). Secretary to the Committee of Management, Saint Andrew Street Development CoOperative Ltd (1976-86). Member of the Housing Co-Operatives Working Group of the National Federation of Housing Associations (1979-86). Make sure the education of future generations of architectural students is determined by an organisation concerned with more than the economic interests of its existing members. Keep Arcuk democratic. Vote! 8 PETER GEORGE RANSON 30 years 1983 Unattached Salaried architect with the firm of CGHP Architects, London. working mainly on inner city housing. Previous professional experience with ASSIST Architects Ltd, Glasgow, and private practices in Northem England. Member of Visiting Board Panel (Student representative) 1980-1982. As another for alternative year rolls by funding and the for those retum working of those closely in govemment with local brings communities a continuedin search what struggles to remain public housing, I find myself out of touch with the changing attitudes of ARCUK and can only seek election under tie platform of man on the no. 9 omnibus (one man operation threatened) asleep on his way to a seat in the rear stalls. DUNCAN ROBERTS 28 years 1986 Unattached Salaried Architect with Community Architecture (Scotland) Ltd, Glasgow. Britain's first community-controlled commercial Architectural practice. Previous experience with the Technical Services Agency, Glasgow. a user-controlled CTAC: Architects and Builders Co-Operative Hull; Forbes Brambles Associates and R&M Finch F/ FRIBA London. Currently shop steward of CAS with the T&GWU, Branch committee. and Glasgow Trades Council. Given the present shambolic state of the their Architectural growing reputation Establishment in the educational I feel the timeand is ripe for the Unattached to build upon •community' orientated dicussion aspects of of design the Profession.and aesthetics and forces that mainipulate The increasing public them calls out for the informed opinions of practicing professionals outside of the Establishment to be heard. There is no reason why the Unattached cannot deveop into a forum for the discussion and dissemination of these ideas offer.and in so doing allowing the public the benefit ot the broa±r vision that we can 9 Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource ARCUK Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived JA Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource Undated https://nam.maydayrooms.org/files/original/ec5fc54f7df289fb580cb260d8fb99a3.pdf 1d3d23c838f88a0addbb52512d58debe Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Professional Issues Description An account of the resource A cohort of NAM members became engaged with the professional registration body, standing as elected councillors on the Architects Registration Council and its various committees. Hitherto entirely dominated by the RIBA bloc, the Council began to yield to a new dynamic through NAM's involvement, enabling fresh perspectives on such issues as mandatory fee scales, greater lay representation on the body, ethically-based standards of professional conduct, etc. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Conduct Monitoring Group Minutes Subject The topic of the resource Conduct Monitoring Group Minutes + final version of Advice to Architects (3 sides) Description An account of the resource Present : Mr David Waterhouse (Chairman) Mr M Nickolls (Chairæn PPC) Messrs. J Allan, N Arnold, E Benroy and the Registrar and Assistant Registrar. It was noted that this was the first meeting of the newly formed Group which in effect had not met for two and a half years. 2. The Group had before it the text of four motions which had been put to the Council at its March meeting on the proposal of Mr Arnold seconded by Mr Walker. The matter had been remitted to the Professional Purposes Comittee for examination and report and the purpose of the present meeting was to give the Professional Purposes Comittee at its meeting on May 1st the benefit of the Group's technical examination. The Chairman introduced the subject by saying that the centre of discussion was the practice of having RIBA me±ership as a requirement in various employment situations. A preliminary survey of eight issues of the publication Architects Journal had shown that out of 35 advertisements by local authorities 10 had mentioned umbership of the RIBA as a for applicantJ and out of 247 practices advertising two had mentioned the same requirement. Various other statistics were mentioned by the Group in other publications. The Chairman went on to say that notions A and B appeared to be similar, with C and D in rather a different category, Mr Arnold said that it seemed to be rather a discriminatory situation when it arose in public autmrity advertising but there was also relevance in private advertiseænts where architects were in control. Turning to the wording of the motions the Chairman pointed out that it was a key-note of the publication '*Conduct and Discipline" that a prohibition should not be specified and therefore to describe anything as "unacceptable conducta would be out of court. This practice could not be seen as per se disgraceful conduct. Mr Arnold said it was not being suggested that any case should automatically rank for the Discipline Comittee t s attention but in a blatant case reference might be made to the Solicitor Complainant with the object of bringing pressure rather than to discipline. Mr Benroy pointed out that it should not be forgotten that AIL constituent bodies were involved because even if it were rare for the acronyms of other constituent bodies to be stipulated reference to the RIBA could be read as ruling out the others. Mr Nickolls pointed out that the PPC t s attitude in the past had been to see this practice not by way of the Standard of Conduct but as the exercise of the freedom of any employer to make stipulations about netlbers of his staff. The Chairman queried whether the practice could be seen as reflecting on an architect's integrity. Mr Allan said it had to be seen in relation to the law affecting of association and in particular Section 17 of the 1931 Act. There certain specifications were laid down before a corporate body could describe itself as "architects n ; this practice proposed an additional filter which the law did not recognise. It was his contention that that was wrong and introduced a distortion of the conditions specified by the law. Mr Benroy said he rather agreed with this and Mr Nickolls said that he was persuaded that the matter could not just be dismissed as if it was not relevant to the Standard of Conduct. There followed some discussion on the extent one could combat an employers right to lay down what conditions he wanted and whether an artifical restriction operated to the disadvantage of the employee or the public. If one could breach integrity by laying down unreasonable conditions could that be said of a preference? Mr Allan said that the question should be put in the form whether or not the preference was reasonable. There followed some discussion on the nuances inherent in a requirement as distinct from a preference. The Group finally came to the conclusion that there is an identifiable relationship between this practice and the Standard of Conduct. It was also agreed that there was action that ARCUK could take and that this should best be done as regard the contents of nntions A and B by the publication of an additional "Advice to Architects" in terms of the attached draft. It was also felt that the substance of motion C and D called for the publication of the document by way of insertion in the 19821/5 Annual Report and distribution to other named addressees. It was agreed that this propositon should be put to the Professional Purposes Comittee at its next meeting with the suggestion that the Comittee recomend to Council accordingly. Mr Arnold said that in the event of the Council accepting the new edition to the "Advice to Architects" he saw no reason why the four motions should not be withdrawn. Issue No. 2 19th June 1985 Advice to Architects On the recommendation of its Professional Purposes Committee the Council has approved the following additional Advice to Architects ; 7 . All registered persons have equivalent recognition from ARCUK and architects concerned with the selection of other architects for appointments or advancement should not without demonstrable justification make any requirement or preference in addition to registration if to do so would put their integrity in question by unreasonably limiting choice. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource ARCUK Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived JA Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 10.4.85 https://nam.maydayrooms.org/files/original/9102b012e200eb390cd81d516a38499c.pdf ef674cc507329ee600970636cfdec8e7 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Professional Issues Description An account of the resource A cohort of NAM members became engaged with the professional registration body, standing as elected councillors on the Architects Registration Council and its various committees. Hitherto entirely dominated by the RIBA bloc, the Council began to yield to a new dynamic through NAM's involvement, enabling fresh perspectives on such issues as mandatory fee scales, greater lay representation on the body, ethically-based standards of professional conduct, etc. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Particulars about candidates for the 1985 election Subject The topic of the resource Particulars about candidates for the 1985 election (4 pp leaflet) Description An account of the resource Architects Registration Council of the United Kingdom Brief particulars about candidates (i) Age Date of Admission to the Register of Architects. Name of Archtecturai Constituent Bodies of which candidate is a member (if any). Present professional post (including the name of the firm or employer) and previous professional experience. Committee experience (architectural and otherwise). Personal statement (if any). Tho views expressed in the candidates' statements below are personal to tho writers and do not repræent the views of the Council of ARCUK JOHN STEWART ALLAN 39 years 1976 (iii ) Unattached Director member of Avanti Architects Ltd., (Cooperative Practice). Previously salaried architect in private practice, and with the Greater London Council. ARCUK: Member of Council 1979-85, also Professional Purposes Committee, Conduct Monitoring Group and Admissions Committee. Design & Industries Association 1967•69; Junior Liaison Organisation 1975-78; Chairman of Highbury Plan Group 1975; Steering Committee of Blackstock Road Advice Centre 1978•79; TASS Building Design Staff National Advisory Committee 1977 ; Founder Member, The New Architecture Movement. In 1984 ARCIJK realised it was bigger than its big brother, the RIBA. and used its statutory authority to speak directly to the Government on education. This sort of independent stance must be strengthened and developed if ARCUK is to fulfil the •public interest' role it always claims. If elected I shall continue to press Council to take the wider view of its responsibilities under the Act that this process entails. NORMAN FRANK ARNOLD 38 years 1979 Unattached Self employed in Leeds ARCUK Council. Finance and General Purposes Committee or Professional Purposes Committee, 198085. New Archi• tecture Movement. There is now concern over the use of the titles "Architectural" and "Architecture", sometimes associated with (surprisesurprise) "British Institute of", "Technology" or "Kitchen". Rather than have ARCUK bicker (B.I.K.A.?) over titles questionably not even covered by the Architects Registration Acts. perhaps the issue should first be left for the RIBA to resolve via the Trade Descriptions Act before they attempt to exploit ARCIJK's statutory powers for protection of their own interests. A more important issue is the RIBA's support for education cuts in order to reduce the number of ne•vA' architects. Whilst it may be prudent to review the numbers of inappropriately educated architects already in circulation. as well as those likely in the future. surely the last thing anyone needs is less environmental education. ARCUK is in fact empowered by statute to increase the Retention Fee ". . . . to improve the general practice of architecture and . all subjects related to architecture . Were it not for RIBA restraint, ARCUK could be making more positive efforts towards the provision of a technically and aesthetically improved archtecture. JAMES ROBERT ALISTAIR BLAMIRE 38 years 1975 Unattached Self employed architect with the firm of ARCADE Community-based Architects. Edinburgh. working mainly on inner city housing. Previous professional experience as a salaried architect in central and local government and private practice both in Britain and the United States. ARCUK Council 1982-85; Admiss ins Committee 198183; Finance and General Purposes Committee 1983-85; New Architecture Movement 1981-82; previously involved in various student, union and education committees. This year the proportion of 'unattached' architects on the Register has increased yet again and ever greater interest in and support for the 'unattached' lobby is being expressed. Much valuable ground work has been done over the past eight years by the founding activists in the present group of •unattached' councillors and. along with this expertise. the continuing trend in numbers is essential if ARCUK is ever to fulfil what I believe to be its statutory role as a publicly accountable body under the terms of the Architects (Registration) Acts. Only in this wav will architectural education be allowed to develop and widen its social objectives and, by extension, the practice of architecture become the democratised service to the community which ARCUK should be seeking to represent. �MICHAEL DAVID BROAD 34 years 1977 (iii) Unattached Self-employed in Edinburgh. Previously employed as Senior Area Development Officer, City of Edinburgh District Council working on inner city Housing ection areas and with Sir Basil Spence, Glover, Ferguson and Partners. (v) ARCUK: Member of Council 1981-85, Professional Purposes Committee. Finance & General Purposes Committee and Admissions Committee. New Architecture Movement 1975•82. This year the number of unattached architects has continued to grow and along with my fellow elected councillors, we continue to seek your views sent c/0 73 Hallam St., to enable those elected to represent you with greater authority. Kno•aing that both the government and the RIBA had expressed a wish to restrict numbers within the profession, the outcome of this years education debate will have surprised few. It is only by increasing the democracy and restoring the voice Of ARCUK that we can give any real hope to our inner cities. There may be a shortne of rich clients but there is an urgent need for architecture. Support democrecy. use your vote to elect Unattached Councillors and send us your views. NICHOLAS DOMMINNEY 27 years 1984 (iii) None Salaried metnber of the Architects & Builders Co-operative (Hull) Ltd. Previous experience: Architectural Assistant for Central Govan Housing Association, Team Architect, STO, PSA. (v) Reporting: CGHA Development Sub-committee. Chairperson: Peel & Hutt Street Residents Association. Local representative: Hull City Council Residents Liaison Committee Association representative: Hull City Council Participation Committee. Chairperson: Hull Innovation Centre Growth Association. ABC Delegate: Hull Co-operative Development Agency Steering Committee. ABC Delegate: Hull Independent Housing Aid Centre Committee. Socialist Workers Party Delegate: Hull Miners Support Committee. ANDREW JAMES EARL 27 years 1984 None Present professional post: Salaried member of The Architects & Builders Co-operative (Hull) Limited. Previous experience: Architectural Assistant, City of Durham Architects Department. Ex-member of management committee Of Hull Architecture workshop. ALAN R. EDWARDS 32 years 1980 Unattached Salaried Architect with Falkirk District Council. Previous employers, Thomas Smith Gibb and Pate (Edinburgh) and Thomas Munro and Co. Of ARCUK Admission Committee 1983-84-85. Member Of the Executive Committee of Falkirk District Council Branch of NALGO. I believe that ARCUK's role is to see that the profession is publically accountable and that all sections of the community, users as well as paying clients, get an adequate service from their Architects. I have put myself forward as a candidate because I feel that the membership of ARCUK Council, to achieve the above, should reflect a cross-section of the profession. both in professional position and place of origin. All too often the process Of government is left to the partners of firms in the South East of England. WILLIAM LESLIE FORSYTH 35 years 1974 Unattached Project leader COMTECHSA Ltd. Liverpool. Previously employed in public and private practice. ARCUK of council (1984-85). Professional Purposes Committee (198485); COMTECHSA Ltd, Secretary (1979. 84); Asociation of Community Technical Aid Centres. Secretary (1982-84): Merseyside Youth Business Initiative Committee (1981-82); Liverpool Inner City Partnership Programme Joint Panel (1982, 83). Community Accountancy Project. Liverpool (1984). Under the terms of the Architects (Registration) Acts ARCUK should be a public interest body and, as such. it should develop that role to include as wide a range of interests as possible. Registration with ARCUK is mandatory for any individual who wishes to use the title Of architect, therefore ARCUK must assume and develop the powers conferred under the ArchitEts (Registration) Acts. ALLEN BERNARD EDWARD GEAL 38 years 1973 (iii) None Present professional post: Salaried Architect. Urban Design Section. City of Bristol. Previous professional experience: Architect in private practice with; Power Clark Hiscocks Partnership. Futcher & Futcher, Architects. Student representative. School Academic Committee, University of Bath. (vi) The decline of public regard for our profession and the erosion of our traditional responsibilities by the encroachment of allied professions is. in part, a result of a flight from responsibility. I believe that we should strive to overcome deficiencies rather than donv them. Much of the current RIBA debate on Professional Liability is concerned with reducing still further our responsibility and duty — and thus our influence. Little of this debate is directed at the service we owe to clients and building users. This trend must be reversed if our opportunities are to expand and our status restored as a profession. I will advocate the increased use of architectural competitions as a means of achieving a more equitable distribution of opportunity. I will support the efforts to *cure lay representation on ARCUK. RICHARD JOHN GRAHAM (i) 39 years 1977 (iii) Unattached At present I practise as an architect on my own account. and teach in the School Of Architecture. Humberside College of Higher Education, •in the capacity of Senior Lecturer in Design. construction and humanities. My previous experience has been, since 1966, in various architectural practices (some famous, some otherwise) in Newcastle and in Hull. (v) My Committee experience is limited to Humberside College's internal committees, including Faculty Board. various course committees. and currently Academic Board. Being in practise in a small way and in teaching in a rather bigger one. I am forced to experience from the painful end these two sides of our profession being systematically dismantled by the government and the Institute. Many dreadful and obvious blunders are to be perpetrated, which make our futures look bleak. The overbearing influence of RIBA members on the presently constituted ARCUK Council is creating an unbalanced impression to the public Of 'official' attitudes to architecture and education. I feel that a stronger unattached contingent (in voice now. and numbers later) is vital. MICHAEL JENKS 39 years 1975 (iii) Unattached Senior Lecturer and Continuing Professional Development (CPD) Co-ordinator, Department of Architecture, Oxford Polytechnic. and Research Fellow. Buildings Research Team, Oxford Polytechnic. (v) ARCUK Council 1984. Steering Committee of Faculty Short Course unit, Research and Advanced Study Committee, and Postgraduate Course RWiew Committee, Department of Architecture. Oxford Polytechnic; involvement with advisory groups in BRE. DOE and Housing Research Foundation projects; member of local amenities committee. The future of the architectural profession is being decided by unrepresentative committees outside ARCIJK's control. Instead of seeking to explore and widen the architect's role and employment possibilities and to strengthen education. retrenchment has been advocated. Such a narrow view cannot be healthy for the profession's development. The unattached have been active in ARCUK to try to widen the debate. If elected, I will seek to promote a wider perception of architectural practice by supporting the varied needs of salaried architects and encouraging more socially responsive practices, and by supporting CPD initiatives and an education in the Schools of Architecture that reflects this diversity. ARCUK has devolved too many of its responsibilities which, with other unattached representatives, I will press ARCUK to restore. The future of the profession is too important to be left to unrepresentative factional interests. CHRISTOPHER GEORGE JONES 36 years 1973 Unattached Member of Architects and Builders Co-operative (Hull) Limited. Senior Lecturer at Hull School of Architecture. Previous experience mainly Local Authority and Housing Association new build at Phippen/RandalI and Parkes. London. Hull Independant Housing Aid Centre. ARCUK Council, 1983-1984. Member of the Association of Community Technical Aid Centres. My two main concerns, Education and Community Architecture again face butchering by the RIBA block vote on ARCIJK. The current NAB proposals on Education go against the ARCUK wbmission. that cuts must be on the basis of quality and notquantity. The gradually returning confidence in Architects through genuine community involvement is being eroded by the RIBA's •jobs for the boys' attitude. ARCUK must rescind its devolved powers to make architecture and education relevant, to the community STUART LINSLEY 25 years 1984 (iii) Unattached (i) James Parr and Partners (architects) Edinburgh as architectural assistant. to become architect upon registration. (ii) Wester Hailes Representative Council Community Design unit. Edinburgh as architectural assistant. (iii) Stephen Easten (building contractors) Ltd, Newcastle upon Tyne as architectural trainee. Represented WHRC Community Design unit at ACTAC Meetings; served on WHRC building sub-committee as architectural While considering a professional institute or association to be a useful entity in which such as architects can participate. I feel the RIBA to be a less than adequate body in terms of its representation of architecture, with particular reference to the promotion of the art, or professionalism. of its members. I feel also that its response to the recent Esher report to be a very poor stance to take towards education. I prefer to support 'ground swell' rather than 'established' organisations in all matters involving the public at large. I feel ARCUK should regain control of its devolved powers. I support the Architects for Peace movement. ALAN ROBERT LIPMAN 59 years 1963 (iii) Unattached Academic (Professor); The Welsh School of Architecture. UWIST, Cardiff; practitioner in southern Africa and in the UK — various practices, public and private. I have served on academic. professional, public and political committees — including ARCUK. the Board of Architectural Education and the Visiting Board Panel of the RIBA (ARCUK representative). until recently. I was Chairperson of CND Cymru (Wales) and a member of the New Architecture Movement. 1975-1982. We architects must, I believe. help to establish ways of making the profession responsible as well as responsive to its social clients. to building users. In arguing for this essential public account±ility — for this idea of service to public interests — I urge that ARCUK and its Board of Architectural Education exercise their proper rights and obligations. I urge that the responsibilities vested in these bodies when Parliament the Architects (Registration) Acts be wrested from others (mainly the RIBA) and duly reinstated with the Council and with the Board. (Duo to severe illness. during the past year I have not been able to fulfil my obligations as a Councillor. I do not anticipate that this will recur.) �THOMAS ANDREW MARKUS 56 years 1950 (iii) Unattached Professor of Building Science. University of Strathclyde since 1966. Previously Reader in Architecutre. Welsh School of Architecture; Manager of Products Applications Department, Pilkington Brothers, Architect, I.C.I. London; Assistant Lecturer in Architecture. University of Manchester; Assistant Architect. Manchester City Council; Studio Assistant. universitv of Manchester School of Architecture. Experience in practice. research, teaching and consultancy. chief involvement in architectural history and theory; buildings, climate and energy. Involved in teaching and assessment at Schools in USA, Canada, Malaysia, Nigeria, Turkey, and a number of European countries. (v) Severat three year spells, including till May 1985, as Strathclyde representative on ARCIJK Board of Architectural Edu• cation and its committees; from 1956 onwards at various times member of several RIBA Committees and Vice•Chairman of Board of Education 1977-78. Chairman of Schools of Architecture Council 1977-79. Intermittently member of the RIBA Visiting Board 1969-77, Member of CAA and ARCUK Visiting Boards. Member of CNAA Architecture Board 1979 present. (vil I believe that Parliament's intentions in the formation of ARCIJK included bringing in influences from the building production and the building user. I believe ARCIJK can once again broaden the intentions behind architectural production so as to make it a fully benevolent social process. ARCIJK must now prevent further restrictive educational practices. PETER GEORGE RANSON 27 years 1983 Unattached Architect with co-operatively run ASSIST Architects Ltd., Glasgow. Previously employed in private practices. Co-tutor at student organised Winter Schools 1982-1984. Member of Visiting Board Panel (student representative) 1980-1982. Co-representative for ASSIST Architects Ltd., as Associate Member of Community Technical Aid Centres. Particularly concerned to oppose cuts in education and encourage ARCUK to rescind its devolved powers to the RIBA. Committed to encouraging work with local communities on minimal funding and more public accountability of architects. CHRISTOPHER RAWSON SHAW (i) 28 years 1984 Unattached Partner in John Planet, a small architect's practice based in Hull. Recently completed my architectural training. During "years out", I worked in a Local Authority architects department in Cumbria, and spent several months working freelance b3sed in London. Nothing wonderful. but I've done my time on various "staff/student" and "course survival" committees. Small is quite nice . . . realistic anyway. THOMAS ADRIAN WOOLLEY 38 years 1971 Unattached Director of the Housing and Rehabilitation Research Unit, Strathclyde University. Previously Practising Architect with "Support' and tutor at the AA. ARCUK Council and Board of Education for several years. New Architecture Movement 1976•80. Associate Member of Association of Community Technical Aid Centres. This year the number of unattached have grown even more, this increases the potential for us to influence the direction taken by ARCUK. As a result the falling RIBA majority on ARCIJK is less and less able to get its policies passed 'on the nod'. For instance we have been able to ensure that ARCUK does not toe the RIBA line on the NAB/UGC plans to cut the number of students studying Architecture. However many other controversial issues are quietly referred on from one meeting to another in the hope that we will overlook them. Thus continuity among unattached representatives is crucial as well as introducing new people to our growing lobby. Vote "Unattached" and encourage your friends to become 'Unattached'. PHILIP ANTHONY WREN 27 years 1984 None Salaried member of The Architects and Builders Co-operative (Hull) Limited. Previously Architectural Assistant, Philip Mercer ARIBA. 197880. None current, Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource ARCUK Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived JA Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1985 https://nam.maydayrooms.org/files/original/f080d7c434e551a89ef904eb1dd3d645.pdf b84ea992bc1f8c197820730863a1288a Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Professional Issues Description An account of the resource A cohort of NAM members became engaged with the professional registration body, standing as elected councillors on the Architects Registration Council and its various committees. Hitherto entirely dominated by the RIBA bloc, the Council began to yield to a new dynamic through NAM's involvement, enabling fresh perspectives on such issues as mandatory fee scales, greater lay representation on the body, ethically-based standards of professional conduct, etc. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Gentlemens' Agreement details and voting paper Subject The topic of the resource Gentlemens' Agreement details and voting paper Description An account of the resource Architects Registration Council of the United Kingdom GENTLEMEN'S AGREEMENT 1. As at pregent constituted, the Gentlanen's Agreement provideg as fol lovs : Board of Architectural Education Of the 24 regi8terea persons to be appointed by the Council: — 2 '8h811 be nominated by the Royal Ingtitute of Briti8h Architects 2 Incorporated Association of Architects and Surveyorg 2 Faculty of ArchitecC8 aqd Surveyors • 2 Representatives on the Council of the Unattached' Architects . leaving 16 to be freely chosen by the Council. Admission 3. 8 registered persons shall be appointed by the Cotmcil of vhcxn:— 2 shall be nominated by the Architectural Association STAMP gection of UCATT 2 Repregencatives on che Council of the C Unactached f Architects leaving 3 to be freely chosen by the Council. Finance and General Purposes Committee Profe88Lona1 Purpoges Each of the above Coamittees shall consist of 13 members , exclusive of the ex officio member 8, appointed ag follows : -- 1 by the Royal Ing tituce of Briti8h Architects 1 Incorporated Association of Architect 8 and Surveyor 8 1 . Paculty of Architects and Surveyor 8 1 Architectural Association STAMP sect ion of UCATT Representatrvea on the Counc i I o t the Una cc ached Archi cect6 \ eaving 6 Co be free ly chosen by the Co uncu I Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource ARCUK Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived JA Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource Undated